Podcast
Questions and Answers
What research method did Oni et al. (2019) use to assess sexual harassment and victimization?
What research method did Oni et al. (2019) use to assess sexual harassment and victimization?
- Mixed methods, experimental design
- Quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive design (correct)
- Qualitative, case-control study
- Qualitative, longitudinal study
According to the research findings, which of the following statements accurately reflects the prevalence of unwanted touching among respondents?
According to the research findings, which of the following statements accurately reflects the prevalence of unwanted touching among respondents?
- A significantly higher percentage of male students reported experiencing unwanted touching compared to female students.
- The study did not collect data on unwanted touching.
- A significantly higher percentage of female students reported experiencing unwanted touching compared to male students. (correct)
- The percentage of male and female students reporting unwanted touching was approximately equal.
Which factor was NOT identified by Parrot and Bechhofer as contributing to the risk of sexual harassment in school settings?
Which factor was NOT identified by Parrot and Bechhofer as contributing to the risk of sexual harassment in school settings?
- Strict enforcement of policies on sexual harassment (correct)
- Alcohol and substance abuse
- Failure of victims to report the incidence
- University community social structure
What is the significance of determining the prevalence of sexual harassment in higher education institutions, according to the study?
What is the significance of determining the prevalence of sexual harassment in higher education institutions, according to the study?
In the context of the study, what was the primary criterion for selecting participants?
In the context of the study, what was the primary criterion for selecting participants?
What statistical significance level was used to check the difference between two variables?
What statistical significance level was used to check the difference between two variables?
According to the study, what percentage of male students reported being coerced into a sexual relationship?
According to the study, what percentage of male students reported being coerced into a sexual relationship?
Which statement best describes the study's findings regarding gender differences in experiencing sexual harassment?
Which statement best describes the study's findings regarding gender differences in experiencing sexual harassment?
Which type of harassment includes a superior conditioning an academic reward upon receipt of sexual favors from a student?
Which type of harassment includes a superior conditioning an academic reward upon receipt of sexual favors from a student?
What did the Code of Good Practice (1998) use to define sexual harassment?
What did the Code of Good Practice (1998) use to define sexual harassment?
What is a potential limitation of the study in generalizing the findings to other institutions?
What is a potential limitation of the study in generalizing the findings to other institutions?
What action is recommended concerning the sexual harassment policy in higher education institutions?
What action is recommended concerning the sexual harassment policy in higher education institutions?
What was the return rate for the distributed questionnaires?
What was the return rate for the distributed questionnaires?
What is the purpose of providing the participants with the contacts of the institution's counselors?
What is the purpose of providing the participants with the contacts of the institution's counselors?
What is meant by sexual harassment, according to the text?
What is meant by sexual harassment, according to the text?
What method was used to select students' room numbers?
What method was used to select students' room numbers?
Who was the questionnaire designed by??
Who was the questionnaire designed by??
What was the correlation coefficient from the test-retest method?
What was the correlation coefficient from the test-retest method?
What was the total number of enrolled students for the 2014 academic year?
What was the total number of enrolled students for the 2014 academic year?
What was the reason for the questionaire to be put in simple English?
What was the reason for the questionaire to be put in simple English?
Flashcards
Sexual Harassment
Sexual Harassment
Persistent, unsolicited, and unwelcomed sexual advances causing distress.
Physical Sexual Harassment
Physical Sexual Harassment
Experience unwanted touching, kissing, or fondling against your will.
Coerced Sexual Relationship
Coerced Sexual Relationship
Unwanted sexual advances leading to feelings of intimidation or fear.
Verbal Sexual Harassment
Verbal Sexual Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Non-Verbal Sexual Harassment
Non-Verbal Sexual Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Quid Pro Quo Harassment
Quid Pro Quo Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Harsher treatment for refusal
Harsher treatment for refusal
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intimidation and marks
Intimidation and marks
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Introduction to Sexual Harassment
- Sexual harassment is a significant public health issue that is often concealed within institutions.
- Defined as persistent, unsolicited sexual advances involving visual, physical, verbal, and non-verbal actions
- It is a stressor affecting individual performance in both organizations and academic settings.
- Catharine MacKinnon defined sexual harassment of learners, especially female learners, as a form of women abuse.
- South Africa has specific legislation through the Code of Good Practice on Handling Sexual Harassment Cases.
- The code defines sexual harassment as unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, distinguished by its potentially coercive or disruptive nature.
- Factors increasing the risk of sexual harassment include social structure, substance abuse, and ineffective policies.
- Perpetrators can be colleagues, supervisors, management, or students, and of the same/opposite gender as the victim
- Victims experience cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and physical symptoms, with long-lasting effects thus impacting families, communities, and society.
Prevalence and Impact of Sexual Harassment
- Studies in developed countries indicate that it is frequent in higher education.
- At Brown University: 6% of female students experienced attempted rape, and 3.8% experienced rape.
- Chinese University of Hong Kong: 14.9% of undergraduate females reported attempted rape, 1.4% reported rape.
- University of Malawi: 67% reported sexual harassment on campus, 12.6% reported rape.
- South Africa: 30% of female learners reported rape and sexual harassment by male learners and teachers, specifically in high schools
Study Objective
- Aims to determine the occurence of sexual harassment and victimization of students within a higher education institution in South Africa.
- The study's goal is to develop prevention and reduction strategies.
Methods
- Quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive survey design was used.
- The study was conducted in one of the higher education institutions in Limpopo province, South Africa.
- The institution had 13,693 students enrolled in 2014, offering qualifications from certificates to postgraduate degrees.
- The student population includes students from African countries like Nigeria, Zimbabwe, and Swaziland.
- The target population was on-campus students aged 18+, with a total of 2,165 bed spaces available.
- 1,176 (54.32%) bed spaces were allocated to females
- 989 (45.68%) were allocated to males
- A sample size of 338 was calculated using Slovin's formula
- Systematic sampling was used to select student room numbers (every 6th room)
- The first room was chosen using simple random sampling.
- Data was collected via questionnaires developed through a literature review and expert consultation.
- Questionnaires were in simple English to avoid ambiguity
- Participants could ask questions while completing it.
- The questionnaire’s reliability was measured using the test-retest method on a sample of 38 students
- The Cronbach Alpha correlation was 0.87, within the acceptable limit.
- Data collection occurred over 30 days, starting April 2nd, 2015
- 400 questionnaires were administered to achieve a high return rate, and 350 were collected, yielding an 87.50% return rate
- 342 questionnaires were analyzed
- Prior arrangements were made with institution counselors to address the study's sensitive nature.
- Participants were informed to not write their names or any form of identification.
- Completed questionnaires were secured and used solely for the study.
- Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23.0, and the Chi-Square test was used.
- Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.
- Ethical clearance was issued in February 2015 by the University of Venda's Ethics Committee
- Participants were informed about the study’s purpose, anonymity, confidentiality, and voluntary participation.
Results
- A total of 342 students participated; 186 (54.39%) males and 156 (46.61%) females.
- Most participants were aged 18-24 years with majority at degree level
- 185 participants (54.09%) spent up to four years at the institution.
- Most of the participants were single (97.66%)
- The majority identified with the Christian religion (99.12%).
- 17.3% of males and 25.3% of females experienced unwanted touching.
- 1.3% of males and 2.7% of females admitted to have been raped
Forms of Harassment
- Males: 17.3% experienced unwanted touching, 36.5% observed it, and 46.2% were aware of it.
- Females: 25.3% experienced, 35.5% observed, and 39.2% were aware of unwanted touching.
- 1.3% of males personally experienced rape, 10.9% had observed it, and 87.8% were aware.
- 2.7% of females had been raped, 4.3% had observed it, and 93.0% were aware.
- 12.2% of males and 18.4% of females experienced unwanted sexual advances
- 37.4% of males and 39.2% of females had observed sex-related jokes
- 16.7% of both male and female students had experienced unwanted sexual oriented text messages
Quid Pro Quo Harassment
- 10.8% of male students were coerced into sexual relations
- 10.2% of female students were coerced into sexual relationships
- 5.1% of male and 5.4% of female respondents were intimidated into unwanted sexual advances for marks
- 75.0% of males and 76.3% of females were aware of this scenario
Discussion of Key Findings
- The study indicates that both male and female students experience sexual harassment on campus
- A statistically significant gender difference was noted in rape, with female students more likely to be affected
- The study aligns with findings on sexual harassment in Ghanaian medical schools.
- The study is notable for focusing on both male and female students.
- Common forms of sexual harassment include unwanted touching, fondling, advances, sex-related jokes/insults, sexual gestures, and unwanted messages/calls
- Quid pro quo harassment, where superiors offer rewards for sexual favors, was also identified
- Females often fall prey to this type of sexual harassment
Recommendations to prevent and mitigate sexual harrasment
- All sectors should be made aware of the policy and grievance procedure with first-year students a priority.
- Clear guidelines on campus safety and facilities should be given to all students
- Regular forums of stakeholders with management should be implemented.
- The institution should clearly state its seriousness of addressing/dealing with sexual harassment.
- Regular communication about sexual harassment across campus through media is essential
- The sexual harassment policy should ensure confidentiality, anonymity, and prescribe severe punishment.
Limitations
- Generalization is difficult due to it being a case study of a university with the results vital for comparison of student's perceived occurence
- Results also act as baseline data
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.