Understanding Justice

Which concept shares overlapping principles with justice?

Which of the following is NOT an aspect of justice as described in the text?

At what level does social justice primarily address fairness?

Which of the following is an accurate representation of justice in ancient India?

According to Confucianism, how is justice maintained?

What was Socrates' view on injustice?

According to Socrates, what does justice NOT mean?

What principle of justice is violated when individuals are discriminated against based on factors like race or gender?

What is the rationale behind proportionate justice?

Which scenario exemplifies proportionate justice?

What is the role of 'special needs considerations' in administering justice?

Which of the following is NOT identified as a 'special need' in the context of justice?

Why can pursuing equality sometimes hinder merit?

What is the primary goal of just distribution?

What do some argue is sufficient for a just society to ensure healthy conditions?

What role does the government play in ensuring minimum living conditions?

What is the core belief of the free market approach to justice?

In the context of pursuing social justice, what does 'intervention' typically refer to?

Within a free market system, what freedoms are considered essential for individuals?

What is a potential drawback of a completely free market system?

How do state interventions aim to empower disadvantaged individuals and enable them to afford a reasonable standard of living?

What role do private organizations play in conjunction with state interventions in providing essential services?

What key element did Dr. B.R. Ambedkar emphasize as vital for a just society?

In the context of 'conflicting principles of justice', what challenge arises when prioritizing special attention to marginalized communities?

How did differing views on law and justice in ancient China influence the justice of the time?

In Plato's 'The Republic', what central question is explored through dialogues regarding justice?

Consider a society structured strictly on 'Equal Treatment for Equals.' What potential ethical concern might arise?

How does the principle of 'degree of self-determination' influence the application of proportionate justice in complex scenarios?

How does the text frame the relationship between access to justice and historical demands?

Imagine a society where resources are distributed strictly according to merit, with no consideration for special needs or historical disadvantages. What potential outcome might arise?

In a society prioritizing free market principles with minimal state intervention, what potential ethical dilemma emerges concerning equality of opportunity?

Consider a government aiming to balance free market principles with interventions to ensure a minimum standard of living. What inherent tension must policymakers navigate?

Imagine a scenario where a government implements extensive land reforms to address historical injustices. What potential challenge might arise in balancing this with principles of individual property rights?

Socrates posited that true justice involves considering everyone, 'even enemies.' In contemporary political discourse, how might this principle challenge conventional approaches to national security and foreign policy?

Consider a hyper-advanced AI system designed to distribute resources according to a complex, ever-evolving algorithm of 'justice'. If this AI system demonstrably reduces overall human suffering but simultaneously generates unforeseen and incomprehensible disparities in resource allocation, would it be considered "just"?

Imagine a hypothetical scenario where neuroscience advances to the point that 'justice' can be objectively quantified: the activation of specific brain regions associated with fairness and empathy. If a policy demonstrably maximizes this 'justice index' across a population, but simultaneously undermines individual autonomy and freedom of choice, is it ethical to implement?