Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which statement accurately differentiates classical conditioning from operant conditioning?
Which statement accurately differentiates classical conditioning from operant conditioning?
- Classical conditioning pairs a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus to create a conditioned response; operant conditioning uses reinforcement or punishment to modify behavior. (correct)
- Classical conditioning involves voluntary behaviors, while operant conditioning deals with involuntary reflexes.
- Classical conditioning focuses on the consequences of behavior, whereas operant conditioning emphasizes antecedent stimuli.
- Classical conditioning strengthens behavior, while operant conditioning weakens it.
In Pavlov's experiments, why was the sound of the bell initially considered a neutral stimulus?
In Pavlov's experiments, why was the sound of the bell initially considered a neutral stimulus?
- It did not naturally elicit the salivation response before being paired with food. (correct)
- It served as a punishment to discourage the dogs from salivating at inopportune times.
- It was presented after the food to ensure the dogs associated it with eating.
- It consistently elicited a response of salivation in the dogs from the beginning.
How does negative reinforcement strengthen a behavior?
How does negative reinforcement strengthen a behavior?
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus after the behavior occurs. (correct)
- By introducing an unpleasant stimulus after the behavior occurs.
- By introducing a pleasant stimulus after the behavior occurs.
- By removing a pleasant stimulus after the behavior occurs.
What is a primary criticism of behaviorism as a comprehensive theory of personality?
What is a primary criticism of behaviorism as a comprehensive theory of personality?
What role do discriminative stimuli play in operant conditioning?
What role do discriminative stimuli play in operant conditioning?
What is the key difference between unconditioned and conditioned responses?
What is the key difference between unconditioned and conditioned responses?
Why does intermittent reinforcement lead to behaviors that are more resistant to extinction?
Why does intermittent reinforcement lead to behaviors that are more resistant to extinction?
In avoidance theory, why did the animals in Rescorla and Solomon's experiment continue to jump over the partition even after the shock was removed?
In avoidance theory, why did the animals in Rescorla and Solomon's experiment continue to jump over the partition even after the shock was removed?
According to Seligman, what critical factor do behaviorists often overlook in their experiments?
According to Seligman, what critical factor do behaviorists often overlook in their experiments?
How did Seligman's experiment with rats and saccharine water demonstrate the concept of preparedness?
How did Seligman's experiment with rats and saccharine water demonstrate the concept of preparedness?
Flashcards
Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning
A learning process where a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an unconditioned stimulus to elicit a conditioned response.
Unconditioned Stimulus
Unconditioned Stimulus
A stimulus that naturally and automatically triggers a response.
Unconditioned Response
Unconditioned Response
The unlearned response that occurs naturally in reaction to the unconditioned stimulus.
Neutral Stimulus
Neutral Stimulus
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conditioned Stimulus
Conditioned Stimulus
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conditioned Response
Conditioned Response
Signup and view all the flashcards
Operant Conditioning
Operant Conditioning
Signup and view all the flashcards
Positive Reinforcement
Positive Reinforcement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negative Reinforcement
Negative Reinforcement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Punishment
Punishment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
-
Behaviorism's origins trace back to Descartes, who proposed that humans are like machines dependent on external stimulus
-
Behaviorism dismisses internal human workings, posing a challenge to its comprehensive theory status
-
Critics acknowledge that behaviorism has contributed significantly to understanding specific human behaviors
The Theory of Behaviorism
- Pavlov's experiment on dogs led to the beginnings of behavioral theory
Classical Conditioning
- Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov discovered classical conditioning while studying digestive reflexes in dogs
- Initially, Pavlov found that dogs would salivate when he placed food in their mouths
- Soon the dogs began to salivate at the sound of the bell or the sight of the attendant, even before food was presented
- Pavlov found that the dogs began to salivate simply at the sound of the bell even without food
First Order Conditioning
- A neutral stimulus that causes no natural response in an organism is associated with an unconditioned stimulus automatically causing a response
- Unconditioned stimulus no longer needs to be present for a response to occur in the presence of the neutral stimulus
- The response is now a conditioned response, and the neutral stimulus is now a conditioned stimulus
- The sound of a bell was the neutral stimulus associated with food
- The unconditioned response of salivation became a conditioned response to the newly conditioned stimulus of the tone
Classical conditioning
- Classical conditioning was the first type of learning studied in the behaviorist tradition
- Ivan Pavlov, was a Russian scientist trained in biology and medicine
- Pavlov investigated why dogs deprived of food began to salivate when one of his assistants walked into the room
- Skinner renamed this type of learning respondent conditioning, responding to an environmental antecedent
Major concepts
- Classical conditioning involves a Stimulus that elicits a Response, where the antecedent stimulus causes a reflexive or involuntary response
- Classical conditioning starts with a reflex, an innate involuntary behavior caused by an antecedent environmental event
- You have no voluntary or conscious control over whether the blink occurs or not
Model
-
Unconditioned Stimulus (US) elicits an Unconditioned Response (UR), a stimulus will naturally elicit a reflexive response
-
Neutral Stimulus (NS) does not elicit the response of interest
-
The Neutral/Orienting Stimulus (NS) is repeatedly paired with the Unconditioned/Natural Stimulus (US).
-
The NS becomes a Conditioned Stimulus (CS), eliciting the Conditioned Response (CR) when presented alone
-
Classical conditioning does not create new behaviors, but an association between the neutral stumulus and the unconditioned stimulus
-
Both the unconditioned stimulus and condition stimulus will elicit the same involuntary response even to a new stimulus
-
The neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus, because it will now elicit a different response as a result of conditioning
-
The response is now called a conditioned response because it is elicited by a stimulus as a result of learning
-
The two responses, unconditioned and conditioned, look the same, but they are elicited by different stimuli
Operant Conditioning
- B. F. Skinner's entire system is based on operant conditioning
- During this "operating," the organism encounters a special kind of stimulus, called a reinforcing stimulus, or simply a reinforcer
- The behavior is followed by a consequence, and the nature of the consequence modifies the organisms tendency to repeat the behavior in the future
Four Types of Operant Conditioning
-
Positive Reinforcement, Negative Reinforcement, Punishment, and Extinction
-
Both Positive and Negative Reinforcement strengthen behavior while both Punishment and Extinction weaken behavior
-
Positive Reinforcement strengthens a behavior by the consequence of experiencing a positive condition
-
A hungry rat presses a bar in its cage and receives food, the rate presses the bar again and again receiving food
-
Negative Reinforcement strengthens a behavior by the consequence of stopping or avoiding a negative condition
-
A rat placed in a cage receives a mild electrical shock, pressing a bar stops the shock
-
Punishment weakens a behavior by the consequence of experiencing a negative condition
-
A rat presses a bar in its cage receiving a mild electrical shock weakening its behavior
-
Extinction weakens a behavior by the consequence of not experiencing a positive condition or stopping a negative condition
-
A rat presses a bar in its cage and nothing happens
-
A behavior followed by a reinforcing stimulus results in an increased probability of that behavior occurring in the future
-
A behavior that is no longer followed by the reinforcing stimulus results in a decreased probability of that behavior in the future
-
With extinction, the operant conditioned response decreased at a much slower rate than when punishment was used
-
Operant conditioning occurs in the rewarding or punishing discipline action taken towards a child
Discriminative stimuli
- Discriminative stimuli guide the response towards a positive or negative consequence, unlike Pavlovian conditioning where stimuli cause the response
- Discriminative stimuli differentiate between beneficial and adverse outcomes, influencing the selection of the most advantageous response
- For example, a red stoplight signals the need to step on the brakes, indicating that negative consequences will arise if the behavior is ignored
Avoidance theory
- The red stop light stimuli and the appropriate stop response are also an example of the behavior known as avoidance-escape behavior
- If an action is not carried out, so the action is carried out
- An animal was trained to jump over the partition to avoid a shock and the animal retained its conditioned jumping behavior
- In avoidant behavior, the escape or absence of reinforcement occurs because of a response
Schedules of reinforcement
- An operant conditioned response conditioned by intermittent schedules of reinforcement
- Intermittent schedules: fixed interval schedules that reinforce a response after a certain fixed amount of time
- Variable interval schedules reinforce a response after an amount of time that varies from reinforcement to reinforcement
- Fixed ratio schedules that reinforce a response after a certain fixed number of responses have been made
- Variable ratio schedules reinforce a response after varied numbers of responses are made
- Maintenance of behavior is increased on intermittent schedules
- Intermittent schedules keep the organism "guessing" as to when the reinforcement will occur
The Validity of Behaviorism
- Pavlovian conditioning and operant conditioning experiments, have been based on animals and their behavior
- Skinner's application of animal behavior to complex human behavior has been questioned.
- Skinner is making the big assumption that general laws relating to the behavior of animals can be applied to describe the complex relations in the human world
- Experiments with human participants must be done to prove the validity of this theory
Inability to explain the development of human language
- Skinner's ideas on operant conditioning are able to explain phobias and neurosis
- The theory's inability to explain the language phenomenon has in fact drawn a large number of critics to dismiss the theory
- Skinner's arguments in response to his critics, remain weak and unproven
- Public objective stimuli act as operational stimuli as verbal responses, private stimuli or concepts such as "I'm hungry" are harder to explain
- Skinner claimed that private stimuli and the community do not need a connection, and public stimuli can be associated with private ones
- M. E. P. Seligman offers an alternative, and states that there is a genetic preparedness of an organism to associate certain stimuli
- An organism brings certain tendencies decided by genetics, which cause conditioned stimuli and unconditioned stimuli to be more or less associable
- Prepared or easily able to associate two stimuli, unprepared or somewhat difficult to associate two stimuli, and contraprepared or unable to associate two stimuli
- Experiments have been concentrated on unprepared sets of stimuli such as lights and shock
- Seligman gives an example of an experiment that evolution had prepared the rats to associate taste with illness, but had contraprepared the association between noise/light and illness
- Seligman's theory of preparedness states that language is simply composed of well-prepared stimuli that are easily able to create relationships between verbal words and ideas or objects
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.