39 Questions
What is a potential pitfall of nature-based solutions (NbS) highlighted in the text?
Over-emphasis on tree planting rather than a wide range of NbS
What potential harm is associated with inappropriate tree planting according to the text?
Disruption of healthy forest establishment
What is a consequence of the current allocation of funds for nature-based solutions (NbS) according to the text?
Mainly directed towards tree planting
What is a potential drawback of the simple narrative 'plant a tree to save the planet' mentioned in the text?
Over-reliance on tree planting as a climate solution
Which factor is a key consideration in the planning meeting for the Nature-based Solution project on Tree-Plantation?
Financial
What is a concern related to the use of non-native species in tree-plantation projects?
They may replace important biodiverse ecosystems
What is a potential benefit of commercial plantations in the context of the Nature-based Solution project?
Providing income for landowners
What is a challenge associated with FLR initiatives in the context of the Nature-based Solution project?
Lack of distinction between reforestation and afforestation
What is a concern about afforestation activities in north-west India?
They result in loss of diversity and promote monocultures
What is a primary reason for the dominance of commercial plantations in the Nature-based Solution project?
Providing income for landowners and tax revenue for governments
What is a concern related to the lack of explicit monitoring of biodiversity outcomes in NbS studies?
Inability to measure the effectiveness of conservation actions
What is a potential drawback of using non-native species in restoration projects?
Replacing native species
What is a key issue with the current pledges for NbS?
Lack of recognition of important distinctions
What is a potential benefit of introducing non-native species in restoration projects?
Better adaptation to current or future climates
What is a concern related to conservation actions in areas rich in both carbon and biodiversity?
Inability to support mitigation and biodiversity goals
What is a concern related to the Bonn Challenge guidance?
Lack of quantitative targets for biodiversity
What potential negative impact can afforestation have on peaty soils?
Lead to soil carbon losses surpassing carbon sequestered by trees
What is a consequence of inappropriate tree planting on high carbon soils or naturally open habitats?
Causing more harm than good
What can happen to harvested timber in terms of carbon release?
End up in short-lived products like paper, card, and MDF furniture, releasing carbon back into the atmosphere
What is a potential consequence of afforestation in fire-adapted savannah and dryland grassland ecosystems?
Reducing ecosystem resilience and long-term soil carbon storage
What is necessary for tree-planting schemes to thrive?
Careful design to thrive in specific conditions
What can planting trees in the wrong place lead to?
Trade-offs between ecosystem services, such as water pollution and reduced water availability
What is a consequence of the current focus on planting trees?
Diverting attention from the urgent need to protect intact ecosystems
What does a balanced approach to Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) prioritize?
Protecting intact ecosystems, restoring partially degraded forests, and implementing 'proforestation'
What can Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) distract from?
The need to decarbonize energy systems
What is a potential consequence of NbS implementation on local communities?
Potential adverse impacts on local communities
Who is often excluded from land-use decisions involving ecosystem protection and management?
Indigenous Peoples and local communities
What is a potential consequence of weak regulatory frameworks in nature-based solutions?
Appropriation of land and resources for environmental purposes
What is a consequence of the lack of involvement of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) in nature-based solutions?
Ignoring their cultural ties to ecosystems and livelihoods
How have some conservation programs alienated local communities?
By using them for labor while restricting their access to resources
Why are local people often marginalized in decision-making processes?
Labeled as ignorant rather than recognized for valuable local knowledge
What can poorly implemented 'offset' projects lead to?
Pushback against Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) from local communities and conservation practitioners
What may arise from Nature-Based Solutions (NbS), benefiting some at the expense of others?
Trade-offs leading to suspicion and negative impacts on local communities
What should be factored in when including affected communities in decision-making processes?
Social differentiation
What may Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) distract from?
The need to decarbonize energy systems
Where are investments primarily directed in the context of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS)?
Creating ecosystems, particularly tree plantations
What does the outcome of NbS initiatives for biodiversity depend on?
Factors such as species used, landscape state, and management regime
What may establishing non-native tree plantations in degraded landscapes benefit locally or regionally, but harm in intact ecosystems?
Biodiversity
What can Afforestation and Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) achieve at the global level, depending on location and productivity?
Net biodiversity benefits
Study Notes
Potential Pitfalls of Nature-Based Solutions
- Weak regulatory frameworks can lead to "green grabbing," where land and resources are appropriated for environmental purposes, displacing vulnerable communities.
- Lack of involvement of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) can ignore their cultural ties to ecosystems and livelihoods.
- Some conservation programs have alienated local communities by using them for labor while restricting their access to resources, impacting stocks and biodiversity.
- Local people are often marginalized in decision-making processes and labeled as ignorant, rather than being recognized as having valuable local knowledge.
- Poorly implemented 'offset' projects can lead to pushback against Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) from local communities and conservation practitioners.
- Trade-offs may arise from NbS, benefiting some at the expense of others, leading to suspicion and negative impacts on local communities.
- Affected communities should be included in decision-making processes, not used for labor, and social differentiation should be factored in.
- NbS can distract from the need to decarbonize energy systems and may overemphasize tree planting at the expense of other NbS.
- Investments are primarily directed towards creating ecosystems, particularly tree plantations, rather than protecting intact ecosystems.
- The outcome of NbS initiatives for biodiversity depends on factors such as species used, landscape state, and management regime.
- Establishing non-native tree plantations in degraded landscapes may benefit biodiversity locally or regionally, but can harm native biodiversity in intact ecosystems.
- Afforestation and Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) can cause local biodiversity loss but may achieve net biodiversity benefits at the global level, depending on location and productivity.
Test your knowledge of the potential pitfalls of nature-based solutions with this quiz. Explore the impact of weak regulatory frameworks, the involvement of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, trade-offs, and the importance of decision-making processes. Delve into the complexities of NbS initiatives and their effects on biodiversity and local communities.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free