40 Questions
What is the court's duty in interpreting a section of the Act according to the given text?
To read the section with regard to the meaning of the words and the contextual scene.
What is the ultimate goal of the court in striking a balance between various considerations?
To ascertain the will of the legislature and state its legal effect with reference to the facts of the particular case.
What is the purpose of the purposive approach to statutory interpretation?
To move away from a rigid and legalistic text-based approach and restore the balance between text and context.
What is the significance of punctuation in statutory interpretation?
Punctuation can affect the meaning of the text.
What is the relationship between the meaning of words in a section and the contextual scene?
The meaning of the words must be considered in the light of the contextual scene.
What is the role of the court in interpreting a statute?
To ascertain the will of the legislature and state its legal effect with reference to the facts of the particular case.
What is the limitation of a purely text-based approach to statutory interpretation?
It can be rigid and legalistic, and may not consider the legislative context and purpose.
What is the ultimate goal of statutory interpretation?
To ascertain the will of the legislature and state its legal effect with reference to the facts of the particular case.
What was the court's decision regarding the use of a commission report in Hopkins v Bloemfontein District Creamery?
The court held that the prevailing law prevented the use of a commission report on the Companies Act.
In Rand Bank v De Jager, what was the court's decision regarding the report by the one-man commission of inquiry?
The report was an admissible aid to interpretation of the Prescription Act.
What is the purpose of the Mischief Rule in interpreting legislation?
To establish the meaning (perspective) of legislation by examining the historical background and purpose of the legislation.
What are the four questions used to establish the meaning of legislation under the Mischief Rule?
What was the legal position before the legislation was adopted? What was the mischief not provided for by existing legislation or common law? What remedy was provided by the legislature to solve this problem? What was the true reason for the remedy?
In Santam Insurance Ltd v Taylor, why did the court examine the historical background of the Act?
Due to the ambiguous language used in the Act, the court was obliged to examine the historical background to ascertain its purpose.
What is Contemporanea Expositio?
An exposition (description) of the legislation at the time of its adoption or shortly thereafter.
What sources may be used to provide Contemporanea Expositio of legislation?
The marginal notes, punctuation, division into paragraphs, and the first application may all serve as such.
What is the significance of considering the historical background of legislation in interpretation?
It helps to determine the original meaning and intent of the legislation, and to clarify any ambiguities or uncertainties.
What is done if the language versions of a legislative text differ but do not conflict?
Read together and attempt to consolidate using context.
Which language version prevails in the event of an inconsistency in the 1996 Constitution?
The English text.
What was the practice with regard to conflicting language versions of subordinate legislation in the past?
There were no constitutional guidelines.
What is the current practice when dealing with conflicting language versions of subordinate legislation?
Read together; or give effect to the one that better benefits the person concerned (if irreconcilable).
Why were old order legislative texts signed alternately in different languages?
So that the signed text can be enrolled for record at the Appellate Division.
What happens to the signed version of legislative texts with the 1961, 1983, and 1993 Constitutions?
The signed version prevails.
What is the purpose of signing legislation?
It is part of the prescribed procedure during the passage of original legislation.
What is the general approach when dealing with conflicting language versions of legislative texts?
Apply the common denominator.
What is the basis of the values that suffuse the whole process in an open and democratic society?
The concept of an open and democratic society based on freedom and equality
What is the role of the notion of an open and democratic society in Constitutional interpretation?
It provides the matrix of deals within which we work, and the final measure for testing the legitimacy of impugned norms and conduct
What is the approach that should be taken in Constitutional analysis, according to Sachs J?
Focus on the synergetic relation between the values underlying the guarantees of fundamental rights and the circumstances of the particular case
What is the significance of Constitutional values, according to Sachs J?
They are not to be used as quotes or slogans, but are meant to be applied consistently
What is the concept of Ubuntu, in the context of African philosophy?
A practical humanist disposition towards the world, including compassion, tolerance, and fairness
What is the significance of Ubuntu in the context of Constitutional values?
It is an important aspect of the values underlying the guarantees of fundamental rights
What is the relationship between the values of an open and democratic society and the concept of Ubuntu?
They are complementary and interconnected, with Ubuntu being an important aspect of the values underlying the guarantees of fundamental rights
What is the implication of the Constitutional values and Ubuntu concept for constitutional interpretation?
They require a nuanced and contextual approach to interpretation, taking into account the circumstances of the particular case
What is the ultimate starting point in interpreting a provision, as explained in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality?
The language of the provision itself, read in context and having regard to the purpose of the provision and the background to the preparation and production of the document.
What is the potential pitfall of relying on the 'ordinary meaning' of a word, as pointed out in Savage v CIR?
What seems clear to one person may not seem clear to another.
According to the principle of interpretation, how should legislation be interpreted?
In such a way that no word or sentence is regarded as redundant.
What is the underlying rule that supports the principle of assigning meaning to every word?
Words are to be understood according to their ordinary meaning.
What was held in Association of Amusement & Novelty Machine Operators v Minister of Justice?
'Ordinary meaning' means colloquial speech.
What is the significance of the grammatical meaning of words, as argued by the court in Sigacu v Sigacu?
It is included in the 'ordinary meaning' of words.
What is the principle supported by the case R v Herman?
Overlapping language and repetition can be omitted.
Why is it important to assign a meaning to every word in legislation?
To ensure that no word or sentence is regarded as redundant.
Study Notes
Conflicting Language Versions
- If one language version is wider than the other, the common denominator is applied.
- If they differ but do not conflict, read together and attempt to consolidate using context.
- In Zulu v Van Rensburg, context is used in interpreting the Constitution.
Signing of Legislation
- Signing of legislation is part of the prescribed procedure during the passage of original legislation.
- Old order legislative texts were signed alternatively in the different languages in which they were drafted.
- The signed text is enrolled for record at the Appellate Division.
- With the 1961, 1983, and 1993 Constitutions, the signed version prevailed.
- Constitution (1996) - Section 240 provides that, in the event of an inconsistency, the English text will prevail.
Subordinate Legislation
- There are no statutory or constitutional rules about conflicting language versions of subordinate legislation.
- In practice, read together or give effect to the one that better benefits the person concerned (if irreconcilable).
- In the past, there were no constitutional guidelines with regard to conflicting texts of delegated legislation.
Interpretation of Legislation
- The language aspect as the departure point is correctly explained as: The inevitable point of departure is the language of the provision itself, read in context and having regard to the purpose of the provision and the background to the preparation and production of the document.
- Every word is important, and legislation should be interpreted in such a way that no word or sentence is regarded as redundant.
- Overlapping language and repetition can be omitted (R v Herman).
- The principle that a meaning must be assigned to every word derives from the rule that words are to be understood according to their ordinary meaning.
Purposive Approach
- The purposive approach does not propagate a method of statutory interpretation based only on the legislative context.
- It merely wants to move away from the rigid and legalistic text-based approach to statutory interpretation and restore the balance between text and context.
Structure of Legislation
- The court held that punctuation can affect the meaning of the text (R v Njiwa).
- The court decided that a report by a one-man commission of inquiry was an admissible aid to interpretation of the Act (Rand Bank v De Jager).
The Mischief Rule
- Uses 4 questions to establish the meaning (perspective) of legislation:
- What was the legal position before the legislation was adopted?
- What was the mischief (defect) not provided for by existing legislation or common law?
- What remedy (solution) was provided by the legislature to solve this problem?
- What was the true reason for the remedy?
- The court was obliged, on account of ambiguous language used in the Act, to examine the historical background of the Act to ascertain its purpose (Santam Insurance Ltd v Taylor).
Contemporanea Expositio
- Is an exposition (description) of the legislation at the time of its adoption or shortly thereafter.
- The marginal notes, punctuation, division into paragraphs, and the first application may all serve as such.
Teleological Dimension
- The values that must suffuse the whole process are derived from the concept of an open and democratic society based on freedom and equality.
- The notion of an open and democratic society is thus not merely aspirational or decorative, it is normative, furnishing the matrix of deals within which we work.
- We should not engage in purely formal or academic analysis, nor simply restrict ourselves to ad hoc technicism, but rather focus on what has been called the synergetic relation between the values underlying the guarantees of fundamental rights and the circumstances of the particular case.
Ubuntu
- Is an indigenous African concept and refers to a practical humanist disposition towards the world, including compassion, tolerance, and fairness (NB).
- Although it is not expressly mentioned in the new constitution, that does not mean it will disappear.
Test your understanding of South African law with this quiz on statutory interpretation, covering key court cases and their implications on the interpretation of laws. Questions will assess your knowledge of the ordinary meaning of language and its application in legal contexts.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
