Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Questions and Answers
Which court case established that merit should be the only basis for appointment once the employment equity goal had been reached?
Which court case established that merit should be the only basis for appointment once the employment equity goal had been reached?
- Reynhardt v UNISA
- Stoman v Minister of Safety & Security & Others
- Coetzer v SAPS
- A.SAPS v Barnard (correct)
Which of the following court cases dealt with the issue of employment equity goals and the role of merit in appointment decisions?
Which of the following court cases dealt with the issue of employment equity goals and the role of merit in appointment decisions?
- Stoman v Minister of Safety & Security & Others
- Reynhardt v UNISA
- Coetzer v SAPS
- A.SAPS v Barnard (correct)
In which court case was it ruled that merit should be the primary factor in appointment decisions once the employment equity goal had been reached?
In which court case was it ruled that merit should be the primary factor in appointment decisions once the employment equity goal had been reached?
- Reynhardt v UNISA
- Coetzer v SAPS
- Stoman v Minister of Safety & Security & Others
- A.SAPS v Barnard (correct)
Which of the following cases did not involve the issue of employment equity goals and merit-based appointments?
Which of the following cases did not involve the issue of employment equity goals and merit-based appointments?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the key principle established by the court in A.SAPS v Barnard regarding employment equity goals and appointment decisions?
What is the key principle established by the court in A.SAPS v Barnard regarding employment equity goals and appointment decisions?
Signup and view all the answers
