Law 2
43 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the burden of proof for a party seeking to have treatment authorized?

The health establishment has the burden of proof.

What must be proven on the balance of probabilities to have treatment authorized? (Select all that apply)

  • The proposed treatment is in the patient's best interest. (correct)
  • The proposed treatment is available in the patient's community service center.
  • The person is capable of consenting.
  • The person is categorically refusing treatment. (correct)
  • What are the Nova Scotia criteria used to establish inaptitude? (Select all that apply)

  • Does the person understand the benefits and risks of the proposed treatment? (correct)
  • Does the person understand the nature and purpose of the proposed treatment? (correct)
  • Does the person understand their diagnosis? (correct)
  • Does the person consider the social implications of their choices?
  • Confinement in an institution is considered an exceptional measure.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are the two main types of forced confinement? (Select all that apply)

    <p>Preventative Confinement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Confinement in an institution is considered a violation of a person's right to privacy.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A danger must be grave and immediate to justify Preventive Confinement.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be done if a physician concludes a danger is still present after Preventive Confinement and the patient refuses to be assessed?

    <p>Obtain authorization from the Court to proceed with a PSY.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the "Section 8 of Act P-38" stipulate about the role of a peace officer?

    <p>A peace officer may take a person against their will to an institution in certain circumstances without court authorization.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A psychiatric examination must be conducted if a person is placed under Preventive Confinement under the "Section 8 of Act P-38".

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the purpose of "Provisional Confinement" under the "Section 8 of Act P-38"?

    <p>To extend the duration of confinement and allow time for a psychiatric assessment to be performed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A court order is required for Provisional Confinement but not for Preventative Confinement.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How long is a person allowed to be confined under a court order for Provisional Confinement?

    <p>7 days</p> Signup and view all the answers

    If a person was initially under Preventative Confinement and refused examination, within how many hours of the court order must a second PSY be completed?

    <p>48 hours</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The two PSYs required for Authorized Confinement must be performed by the same psychiatrist.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the maximum duration of confinement allowed under a court order for Authorized Confinement?

    <p>30 days</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the maximum duration of confinement allowed for a renewed Authorized Confinement?

    <p>90 days</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens if one of the two physicians writing the PSYs reaches the conclusion that confinement is not necessary?

    <p>The person is automatically released.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An application for confinement must be presented to court within 48 hours after the PSYs are completed.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    If a person is deemed not dangerous, they are automatically released from confinement even if the initial confinement period hasn't elapsed.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under "Section 10 of Act P-38", when is a person under confinement subject to periodic examinations? (Select all that apply)

    <p>Every three months</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A person under confinement is allowed to refuse a psychiatric examination if they are certain it will be prejudicial.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A person under confinement can communicate with individuals of their choice, as long as their physician approves.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Patient access to their medical records is unlimited.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of "McInerney v. MacDonald", the Supreme Court confirmed that a patient can access the entirety of their medical file.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A spouse of a deceased patient is allowed to access the cause of death information in their medical record.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The holder of parental authority has unlimited access to a minor's medical record according to the "Section 23 of the LSSSS".

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The "LSSSS" outlines exceptions to parental authority access to a minor's medical record. When is access refused? (Select all that apply)

    <p>When the minor is 14 years or older and refuses to allow their record to be communicated to the holder of parental authority.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The "Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse" can investigate any situation where they believe a child's rights have been encroached upon.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The "Director of Youth Protection" can enter any facility to examine a minor's medical record.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are some examples of when "security and development" of a child may be in danger under the "Youth Protection Act"? (Select all that apply)

    <p>A child is frequently absent from school without cause.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A minor under 14 years of age can give consent to medical care.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Minors over 14 years of age can give consent alone to care required by the state of health, requiring a court order only if they refuse the care.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Limited budgets and an aging population can contribute to tension between the demands on the healthcare system and its ability to meet those demands.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The "LSSSS" seeks to mediate between the realities of limited healthcare resources and patient needs.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Patients have the right to choose a healthcare professional or institution, regardless of the availability of resources.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A hospital can refuse to serve a patient based solely on their residence.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A hospital can refuse to provide certain types of care if they are not available as a general rule in the hospital.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The hospital in the case study of "Jasmin c Cité de la santé de Laval" was seeking to restrict access to obstetrical and diagnostic services to residents of certain municipalities due to overwhelming demand.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The hospital in the case study of "Noël-Voizard c. CSSS Lasalle et du Vieux-Lachine" was found liable for the patient's long wait time in the emergency room.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The patient in the case study of "J.O. vs. Hôpital Royal Victoria" was known for his extremely verbally abusive behavior towards hospital staff.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case study of "J.O. vs. Hôpital Royal Victoria", the court upheld the hospital's decision to refuse to put the patient on the kidney transplant waiting list due to his behavior.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The court in the case study of "J.O. vs. Hôpital Royal Victoria" determined that the hospital was legally obligated to transfer the patient to another facility for dialysis care, despite his behavior.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Law 2 - Confinement, Privacy & Confidentiality, and Resources

    • Course: NUR1 424 - Fall 2024
    • Lecturer: Daria Kapnik

    Plan

    • Authorization for Treatment
      • Recap of Court Orders under CCQ
      • Treatment order
    • Confinement Law
      • General Principles
      • Parameters
      • Types of Confinement
        • Preventative Confinement
        • Provisional Confinement
        • Authorized Confinement (Institutional)
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - Process
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - Duration
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - PSY content
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - Court order criteria
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - Renewal
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - End of Confinement
          • Motion for Authorized Confinement - Longer Confinement
      • Rights of the person under confinement
      • Potential issues in confinement
    • Privacy, Confidentiality, and Resources
      • Patient access and medical records
        • General
        • Deceased patients
        • Privacy, confidentiality and care regarding minors
    • Management of Limited Resources and Patient Rights
      • Key Provisions
      • Caselaw
        • Charles Le Moyne c. E.(F.) (CQ)
        • CSSS Côte-de-Gaspé c.P(C) - EYB 2013-227952 (CQ)
        • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont c. H. (M.) - EYB 2013-219305
        • Hôpital Jean-Talon du (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, 2018
        • Jasmin c Cité de la santé de Laval (AZ-90021046 (CS))
        • Noël-Voizard c. CSSS Lasalle et du Vieux-Lachine (2007 QCCQ 5118)
        • J.O vs. Hôpital Royal Victoria (2011 QCCS 5532)

    Outline

    • Authorization for Treatment
      • Recap of Court Orders under CCQ
      • Treatment Order
    • Confinement in an Institution
      • General Principles
      • Parameters
      • Types of Confinement
        • Preventative Confinement
        • Provisional Confinement
        • Authorized Confinement
      • Rights of the person under confinement
      • Potential issues in confinement

    1. Authorization for Treatment 1.1 Recap of Court Orders under CCQ

    • Article 16 CCQ: Person of full age incapable of giving consent categorically refuses to receive care; no representative found for delegated consent or refused without justification; Minor over 14 refuses care (not in emergency or where life/integrity threatened)
    • Articles 17/18 CCQ: Care entails serious risk for minor's health (even if over 14)

    1.2 Treatment Order

    • WHO: Party seeking authorization (usually, the healthcare establishment) bears the burden of proof.
    • WHAT: Must prove (balance of probabilities)
      1. Person lacks capacity to consent to proposed treatment
      2. Person categorically refusing treatment
      3. Proposed treatment is in patient's best interest
    • HOW: Motion + expert reports + testimonial evidence (e.g., psychiatrist & residents)
    • WHY: To introduce/force treatment

    To Establish Inaptitude

    • Nova Scotia criteria (proposed by the Canadian Psychiatric Association and reflected in Institut Philippe-Pinel de Montréal c. A.G. 2012)
      1. Does the person understand the nature of the illness?
      2. Does the person understand the treatment's nature and purpose (and other options)?
      3. Does the person understand the benefits and risks of the treatment?
      4. Does the person understand the risks and consequences of not undergoing treatment?
      5. Is the person's ability to understand affected by their illness?
    • Exercise assessing ability to understand/appreciate information and how it applies, reason, express choice.

    2. Confinement in an Institution

    2.1 General Principles

    • Confinement in an institution is exceptional measure ~ contrary to right to integrity/inviolability
    • Person must be in a state that represent a serious/immediate danger to themselves or others
    • Pertinent legislation: Civil Code of Québec + Code of Civil Procedure (P-38.001)

    2.3 Types of Confinement

    • Voluntary confinement (patient consents and has capacity to do so)
    • Forced confinement:
      • Preventative
      • Provisional
      • Authorized

    2.4 Preventative Confinement

    • Person must be a danger to himself/others with grave and immediate danger
    • Court order not required (ordered by physician)
    • Possible assistance from peace officer
    • Article 27 CCQ (par. 2) - preventative confinement if grave and immediate danger

    2.5 Provisional Confinement

    • Danger to self/others (grave/serious danger, potentially foreseeable in future)
    • Court order (motion) required from physician/interested party
    • Used if patient refuses evaluation for dangerousness
    • May include police assistance
    • Applies outside hospital setting

    2.6 Authorized Confinement Process (Institutional)

    • If either physician concludes confinement unnecessary, release the person (30 CCQ contrary)
    • Application presented to court within 48 hours (Art. 28 CCQ)
    • Confinement permissible for up to 48 hours after both PSYs

    2.6.1 Motion for Authorized Confinement - Process

    • If one physician concludes no need for confinement, release the person
    • Application filed with court within 48 hours (Art. 28 CCQ).

    2.6.2 Motion for Authorized Confinement – Duration

    • Maximum 30 days; alternative timeframe possible
    • Release when no longer considered a danger to self/others

    2.6.3 Motion for Authorized Confinement – PSY content

    • Psychiatric examination report addressing necessity of confinement due to danger to self/others
    • Ability to care for oneself/administer property
    • Advisability of protective supervision

    2.6.4 Motion for Authorized Confinement – Court order criteria

    • Confinement authorized only when both psychiatric reports deem confinement necessary.
    • Court must have serious reasons to believe in person's dangerousness, regardless of evidence contradicting.

    2.6.5 Motion for Authorized Confinement – Renewal

    • 30-day period may be extended up to 90 additional days
    • Psychiatrist must conclude confinement still necessary

    2.6.6 Motion for Confinement – End of Confinement

    • Ends with no formality when attending physician certifies no longer justified or expiry of time limit
    • Court decision/Administrative Tribunal of Québec action
    • Release if confinement no longer justified.

    2.6.7 Motion for Confinement – Longer Confinement

    • Court can set duration exceeding 21 days; periodic assessment for necessary confinement
      • Report due at 21 days from decision and every 3 months thereafter.

    2.7 Rights of the person under confinement

    • Schedule of P-38: Comprehensive rights outline (copied to last slide)
    • Person must be served application for confinement.
    • Exception = clinical testimony if person cannot be found/has fled/their health prevents it.
    • Allowed communication with outside parties unless valid medical reason

    2.8 Potential issues in confinement

    • Consent to care during confinement requires Superior Court approval
    • Restraints only with protocol/emergency order
    • Communicate with DPS for AWOL

    3. Caselaw

    • Charles Le Moyne c. E.(F.) (CQ): 20-year-old male college student placed in hospital due to neighbours' complaints; no prior history of mental illness, judged not to be a danger himself/others.
    • CSSS Côte-de-Gaspé c. P(C.) EYB 2013-227952(CQ): Patient with bipolar disorder; found that person's prior behaviour doesn't justify continued confinement, danger must be present in short/medium term

    3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 Caselaw

    • Facts and details of specific cases (see specific case law sections for details regarding cases)
    • Decisions and Rationale of case law

    4. Privacy - Patient Access and Medical Records

    • Patient's right to access own medical records
    • Right to correct inaccurate, incomplete or ambiguous information
    • Medical professional may deny access if substantial adverse effect on patient or harm to a third party

    4.1 General (cont'd)

    • AHSSS/LSSSS, Article 17: Every user (14 years or older) has access right; institution can temporarily deny if relevant to health, specify the reasoning and timeframe.

    4.2 Deceased Patients

    • Heirs, legatees, legal representatives entitled to information unless deceased refused access in writing
    • Spouse, ascendants, direct descendants entitled to information unless deceased refuses access in writing
    • Parental authority figure (under 14) has access right even if user is deceased; access doesn't extend to psychosocial information.
    • Relatives by blood are entitled to information concerning verified existence of familial genetic/hereditary disease

    5. Privacy, Confidentiality, and Care Issues Regarding Minors

    • Parental access to a minor's health information
    • Access by other bodies to a minor's health information
    • Statutory duties of disclosure
    • Other bodies refusing access, when parental authority is determined to be in the minor's best interest

    5.1, 22, 23 sections of LSSSS.

    • Holder of parental authority entitled to access if minor
    • Tutor/curator/mandatary may access information for a minor to the extent necessary for the exercising of their power

    Exceptions to 21 LSSSS

    • Refusal of access if the minor is deemed to be in danger based on Youth Protection Act

    6. Management of Limited Resources & Patient Rights

    • Limited health sector budgets and an aging population creates a need for managing resources
    • The Act Respecting Health Services and Social Services (LSSSS) mediates between demands on the health care system to meet realistic resource needs

    6.1 Rights and Obligations in LSSSS

    6.2 What Happens When Rights Conflict

    • Jasmin c Cité de la santé de Laval (AZ-90021046 (CS)): Hospital's regulations restricting OB/GYN services to certain municipalities were ruled discriminatory, contrary to LSSSS.
    • Noël-Voizard c. CSSS Lasalle et du Vieux-Lachine (2007 QCCQ 5118): Plaintiff's case dismissed; court considered wait times, the limited resources available, and that the hospital had done its best.
    • J.O. vs. Hôpital Royal Victoria (2011 QCCS 5532): Patient had to be transferred- behaviour made it impossible to continue dialysis care.

    6.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 Details

    • Specific facts, regulations, court decisions in each case (see specific case law sections for details regarding each of the various cases).

    6. I Key provisions AHSSS and LSSS

    • General rights to choose, with continuity and safety of services granted. Also right to health services with a choice of institution/professional as provided in other relevant sections. Further, persons can take professional and health services according to the structure and limitations of the institution.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    More Like This

    Law 22/2009 Fishing Regulations Quiz
    20 questions
    Law 2
    40 questions

    Law 2

    MultiPurposeEnjambment3331 avatar
    MultiPurposeEnjambment3331
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser