Podcast
Questions and Answers
Why was genocide excluded from the list of chargeable crimes within the Special Court Statute?
Why was genocide excluded from the list of chargeable crimes within the Special Court Statute?
- Because the Sierra Leonean government requested its exclusion to promote national reconciliation.
- Due to a lack of evidence suggesting the atrocities were motivated by an intent to destroy a specific group as defined by the Genocide Convention. (correct)
- Because genocide is exclusively under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
- Because the Rome Statute excludes genocide from the jurisdiction of such courts.
Which of the following best describes the nature of the armed conflict to which the violations of Common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II relate, according to the Special Court Statute?
Which of the following best describes the nature of the armed conflict to which the violations of Common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II relate, according to the Special Court Statute?
- Hybrid armed conflict
- International armed conflict
- Non-international armed conflict. (correct)
- Inter-state armed conflict
What are the primary factors that most commentators identify as the underlying causes of the rebel war in Sierra Leone?
What are the primary factors that most commentators identify as the underlying causes of the rebel war in Sierra Leone?
- Ethnic rivalry and resource scarcity.
- Profound class tensions and political corruption (correct)
- Clash of civilizations and ideological differences
- Religious extremism and foreign intervention
Why doesn't the Special Court Statute include 'grave breaches' of the Geneva Conventions within its jurisdiction?
Why doesn't the Special Court Statute include 'grave breaches' of the Geneva Conventions within its jurisdiction?
A prosecutor is building a case related to atrocities committed during the Sierra Leonean civil war. Considering the jurisdiction of the Special Court Statute, which of the following charges would be most appropriate to pursue?
A prosecutor is building a case related to atrocities committed during the Sierra Leonean civil war. Considering the jurisdiction of the Special Court Statute, which of the following charges would be most appropriate to pursue?
If evidence emerged suggesting a widespread and systematic campaign to eliminate a particular religious group during the Sierra Leone conflict, how would this affect the potential prosecution of genocide under the Special Court Statute?
If evidence emerged suggesting a widespread and systematic campaign to eliminate a particular religious group during the Sierra Leone conflict, how would this affect the potential prosecution of genocide under the Special Court Statute?
How does the focus on Common Article 3 and Additional Protocol II in the Special Court Statute reflect the legal characterization of the Sierra Leone conflict?
How does the focus on Common Article 3 and Additional Protocol II in the Special Court Statute reflect the legal characterization of the Sierra Leone conflict?
Considering the Statute's focus on specific violations of humanitarian law, what type of actions would fall outside the jurisdiction of the Special Court?
Considering the Statute's focus on specific violations of humanitarian law, what type of actions would fall outside the jurisdiction of the Special Court?
Which of the following actions would NOT be considered a war crime according to the Nuremberg Statute?
Which of the following actions would NOT be considered a war crime according to the Nuremberg Statute?
The category of 'crimes against peace' at Nuremberg primarily focused on:
The category of 'crimes against peace' at Nuremberg primarily focused on:
What distinguishes 'crimes against humanity' from 'war crimes' under the Nuremberg Statute?
What distinguishes 'crimes against humanity' from 'war crimes' under the Nuremberg Statute?
The 2010 Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court primarily address:
The 2010 Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court primarily address:
Why was the definition of 'crimes against peace' considered to be 'most in need of elaboration' following the Nuremberg trials?
Why was the definition of 'crimes against peace' considered to be 'most in need of elaboration' following the Nuremberg trials?
Which of the following scenarios would most likely be classified as a 'crime against humanity' according to the Nuremberg principles?
Which of the following scenarios would most likely be classified as a 'crime against humanity' according to the Nuremberg principles?
How does the definition of war crimes in the Nuremberg Statute relate to customary international humanitarian law?
How does the definition of war crimes in the Nuremberg Statute relate to customary international humanitarian law?
Why did the 2010 Amendments to the Rome Statute regarding the crime of aggression not become operational immediately?
Why did the 2010 Amendments to the Rome Statute regarding the crime of aggression not become operational immediately?
Under what circumstances can the UN Security Council refer a case to the ICC, bypassing the usual territorial or nationality requirements?
Under what circumstances can the UN Security Council refer a case to the ICC, bypassing the usual territorial or nationality requirements?
What is the proprio motu authority of the ICC Prosecutor?
What is the proprio motu authority of the ICC Prosecutor?
Which of the following scenarios would permit the ICC to potentially investigate a crime?
Which of the following scenarios would permit the ICC to potentially investigate a crime?
What is the role of the principle of 'complementarity' in the ICC's jurisdiction?
What is the role of the principle of 'complementarity' in the ICC's jurisdiction?
A government, under pressure from international bodies, claims it is actively prosecuting individuals for war crimes, but in reality, the trials are a sham. How might the ICC respond, considering the principle of complementarity?
A government, under pressure from international bodies, claims it is actively prosecuting individuals for war crimes, but in reality, the trials are a sham. How might the ICC respond, considering the principle of complementarity?
A state party to the Rome Statute is experiencing widespread internal conflict, and its judicial system is overwhelmed and unable to function effectively. How does this situation affect the ICC's potential jurisdiction?
A state party to the Rome Statute is experiencing widespread internal conflict, and its judicial system is overwhelmed and unable to function effectively. How does this situation affect the ICC's potential jurisdiction?
An individual is accused of committing genocide in a state that is a party to the Rome Statute. The accused is a national of a state that is not a party. Assuming the UN Security Council does not make a referral, can the ICC exercise jurisdiction?
An individual is accused of committing genocide in a state that is a party to the Rome Statute. The accused is a national of a state that is not a party. Assuming the UN Security Council does not make a referral, can the ICC exercise jurisdiction?
A non-state party investigates and convicts an individual for war crimes committed on its territory. Later, evidence emerges suggesting the national trial was deeply flawed. Can the ICC then step in?
A non-state party investigates and convicts an individual for war crimes committed on its territory. Later, evidence emerges suggesting the national trial was deeply flawed. Can the ICC then step in?
Under what specific article of the Rome Statute does the Security Council have authority related to ICC jurisdiction?
Under what specific article of the Rome Statute does the Security Council have authority related to ICC jurisdiction?
Which article of the Rome Statute provides protection against double jeopardy when a person has been previously convicted by a domestic court?
Which article of the Rome Statute provides protection against double jeopardy when a person has been previously convicted by a domestic court?
According to the Rome Statute, under what condition is the ICC Prosecutor allowed to defer a prosecution?
According to the Rome Statute, under what condition is the ICC Prosecutor allowed to defer a prosecution?
Which of the following reflects Keller's view on alternative justice mechanisms like the Ugandan truth commission and mato oput?
Which of the following reflects Keller's view on alternative justice mechanisms like the Ugandan truth commission and mato oput?
Which of the following justice goals is Keller emphasizing when she mentions that Ugandan truth commission and mato oput constitute an improvement over ICC prosecution?
Which of the following justice goals is Keller emphasizing when she mentions that Ugandan truth commission and mato oput constitute an improvement over ICC prosecution?
Which of the following scenarios describes an instance where the ICC Prosecutor opens a case proprio motu?
Which of the following scenarios describes an instance where the ICC Prosecutor opens a case proprio motu?
What was the primary reason for the ICC's involvement in the Kenya case?
What was the primary reason for the ICC's involvement in the Kenya case?
Which of the following situations led to the Security Council referring a case to the ICC?
Which of the following situations led to the Security Council referring a case to the ICC?
A state refers a case to the ICC. Which of the following scenarios could explain this?
A state refers a case to the ICC. Which of the following scenarios could explain this?
Which situation best illustrates the ICC exercising its jurisdiction as a court of last resort, complementing national justice systems?
Which situation best illustrates the ICC exercising its jurisdiction as a court of last resort, complementing national justice systems?
Which of the following actions were systematically carried out by all factions in the conflict described?
Which of the following actions were systematically carried out by all factions in the conflict described?
What distinguishes the ICC's involvement in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) from its interaction with Uganda, based on the information provided?
What distinguishes the ICC's involvement in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) from its interaction with Uganda, based on the information provided?
What was the reason for the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo referring the situation occurring on its territory to the ICC?
What was the reason for the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo referring the situation occurring on its territory to the ICC?
What is a key characteristic of the individuals indicted by the ICC in the DRC case?
What is a key characteristic of the individuals indicted by the ICC in the DRC case?
Why might the ICC have prioritized the DRC referral over Uganda's communication, even if the latter came earlier?
Why might the ICC have prioritized the DRC referral over Uganda's communication, even if the latter came earlier?
If the ICC's involvement aims to address impunity, what broader impact might it seek to achieve in the DRC?
If the ICC's involvement aims to address impunity, what broader impact might it seek to achieve in the DRC?
What does the trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo signify within the context of the ICC's operations in the DRC?
What does the trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo signify within the context of the ICC's operations in the DRC?
How do the actions of groups like the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC) and the Forces Patriotiques pour la Libération du Congo (FPLC) potentially violate international humanitarian law?
How do the actions of groups like the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC) and the Forces Patriotiques pour la Libération du Congo (FPLC) potentially violate international humanitarian law?
What is the primary concern raised by the Beyond Juba Project (BJP) regarding the domestic prosecutions of the LRA by the Ugandan government and the ICC prosecutions?
What is the primary concern raised by the Beyond Juba Project (BJP) regarding the domestic prosecutions of the LRA by the Ugandan government and the ICC prosecutions?
According to the Beyond Juba Project, what comparison does it make using the Special Court of Sierra Leone?
According to the Beyond Juba Project, what comparison does it make using the Special Court of Sierra Leone?
The Beyond Juba Project implies that a key issue for the average Ugandan or Sierra Leonean regarding international criminal prosecutions is:
The Beyond Juba Project implies that a key issue for the average Ugandan or Sierra Leonean regarding international criminal prosecutions is:
What stance did UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay take regarding ICC prosecutions of the LRA leadership, despite calls for alternative approaches?
What stance did UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay take regarding ICC prosecutions of the LRA leadership, despite calls for alternative approaches?
What is the central ethical dilemma highlighted by the Beyond Juba Project's critique of international criminal justice interventions in Uganda and Sierra Leone?
What is the central ethical dilemma highlighted by the Beyond Juba Project's critique of international criminal justice interventions in Uganda and Sierra Leone?
Based on the concerns raised by the Beyond Juba Project, what could be a potential unintended consequence of prioritizing ICC or domestic prosecutions in post-conflict settings?
Based on the concerns raised by the Beyond Juba Project, what could be a potential unintended consequence of prioritizing ICC or domestic prosecutions in post-conflict settings?
How does the Beyond Juba Project's perspective on the Ugandan government's commitment to domestic prosecutions of the LRA compare to its view on ICC prosecutions?
How does the Beyond Juba Project's perspective on the Ugandan government's commitment to domestic prosecutions of the LRA compare to its view on ICC prosecutions?
Which statement encapsulates the tension between retributive justice (prosecution) and restorative justice (reparations) in post-conflict societies, as highlighted by the Beyond Juba Project?
Which statement encapsulates the tension between retributive justice (prosecution) and restorative justice (reparations) in post-conflict societies, as highlighted by the Beyond Juba Project?
Flashcards
War Crimes
War Crimes
Acts like murder or ill-treatment of prisoners, wanton destruction, or unjustified devastation during war.
Crimes Against Humanity
Crimes Against Humanity
Inhumane acts like murder, enslavement, or deportation against civilians, before or during a war, based on political, racial, or religious grounds.
Crimes Against Peace
Crimes Against Peace
A category of Nuremberg crimes that needed further definition, leading to the evolution of defining aggression.
Rome Statute
Rome Statute
Signup and view all the flashcards
Examples of War Crimes
Examples of War Crimes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Examples of Crimes Against Humanity
Examples of Crimes Against Humanity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Article 6(b) of the Nuremberg Statute
Article 6(b) of the Nuremberg Statute
Signup and view all the flashcards
Customary International Humanitarian Law
Customary International Humanitarian Law
Signup and view all the flashcards
Special Court Jurisdiction
Special Court Jurisdiction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exclusion of Genocide Charge
Exclusion of Genocide Charge
Signup and view all the flashcards
Causes of Sierra Leone Conflict
Causes of Sierra Leone Conflict
Signup and view all the flashcards
War Crimes Definition
War Crimes Definition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Common Article 3 & Protocol II Relevance
Common Article 3 & Protocol II Relevance
Signup and view all the flashcards
“Grave breaches” Exclusion
“Grave breaches” Exclusion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Genocide Convention definition
Genocide Convention definition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Additional Protocol II
Additional Protocol II
Signup and view all the flashcards
UPC and FPLC
UPC and FPLC
Signup and view all the flashcards
April 19, 2004
April 19, 2004
Signup and view all the flashcards
May 23, 2004
May 23, 2004
Signup and view all the flashcards
Three
Three
Signup and view all the flashcards
The Beyond Juba Project (BJP)
The Beyond Juba Project (BJP)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Special Court of Sierra Leone's funding
Special Court of Sierra Leone's funding
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rebel leaders
Rebel leaders
Signup and view all the flashcards
2009
2009
Signup and view all the flashcards
BJP's core concern
BJP's core concern
Signup and view all the flashcards
Torture, Rape, Child Soldiers
Torture, Rape, Child Soldiers
Signup and view all the flashcards
Paradoxical Financial Attention
Paradoxical Financial Attention
Signup and view all the flashcards
Systematic Torture and Displacement
Systematic Torture and Displacement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Navi Pillay's Stance on ICC
Navi Pillay's Stance on ICC
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pillay's Reports (2009)
Pillay's Reports (2009)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Civil Society's Stance
Civil Society's Stance
Signup and view all the flashcards
ICC Trials
ICC Trials
Signup and view all the flashcards
ICC Jurisdiction Prerequisites
ICC Jurisdiction Prerequisites
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ways to Refer a Case to the ICC
Ways to Refer a Case to the ICC
Signup and view all the flashcards
UN Security Council Referral to ICC
UN Security Council Referral to ICC
Signup and view all the flashcards
ICC Discretion
ICC Discretion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Complementarity
Complementarity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Complementarity in Action
Complementarity in Action
Signup and view all the flashcards
Purpose of Complementarity
Purpose of Complementarity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Benefits of Complementarity
Benefits of Complementarity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Article 16 (ICC)
Article 16 (ICC)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Article 20 (ICC)
Article 20 (ICC)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Article 53 (ICC)
Article 53 (ICC)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Interests of Justice Deferral
Interests of Justice Deferral
Signup and view all the flashcards
Alternative Justice Mechanisms
Alternative Justice Mechanisms
Signup and view all the flashcards
States under ICC Jurisdiction (2011)
States under ICC Jurisdiction (2011)
Signup and view all the flashcards
ICC Case Initiation
ICC Case Initiation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mato Oput Example
Mato Oput Example
Signup and view all the flashcards
Propio Motu
Propio Motu
Signup and view all the flashcards
Crimes Under ICC Jurisdiction
Crimes Under ICC Jurisdiction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
International Criminal Law
- Aims to hold individuals accountable for offenses that attack the fabric of global society
- Explicitly enforced through trials by transnational judicial bodies
Historical Context and Examples
- Allied powers created the Nuremburg Tribunal in 1945 to try suspected Nazi war criminals
- The UN Security Council mandated International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in 1993 and 1994 to prosecute perpetrators of genocides
- The UN and Sierra Leone established the Special Court for Sierra Leone in 2002 to try offenders of the country's civil war
- 60 states had ratified and brought into force the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) by 2002, extending jurisdiction worldwide
Implementation and Domestic Prosecutions
- Brought to bear through domestic prosecutions, state courts apply criminal statutes
- The Convention Against Torture (CAT) requires signatories to criminalize torture under domestic law, invoking national and international law when trying individuals
Restorative Justice
- Some legal scholars argue for restorative justice as essential to international criminal justice
- Restoration is closest to rehabilitation, adding a collective dimension to the classic foundations of criminal law
- Seeks transformation and healing of society, vindicating international criminal law through traditional and modern institutions
- Mechanisms in Uganda, Sierra Leone, and Burundi involve amnesty, social reintegration for offenders, reparations, empowerment for victims, truth-telling, and reconciliation
Alternative Justice Mechanisms
- Include the Acholi communal atonement ceremony in Uganda and ubushingantahe-traditional Burundian dispute resolution
- These are controversial
- They’re emphasized less than the retributive dimension, yet they still contribute toward national reconciliation commissions
- Greater confidence and prevention of social conflicts may result from this and address social issues more meaningfully
Focus of Chapter
- Centers on formally constituted international criminal courts created by international treaty or UN resolutions
- Examines amnesty, truth-telling, and remedial mechanisms
- Recognizes kinship between national reconciliation and international rule of law
International Crimes
- Defined by customary international law or international treaties
- Encompass piracy, human trafficking, terrorism, and torture
- Focus is on war crimes during armed conflict and brutality against communities (crimes against humanity)
War Crimes
- Violations of international humanitarian law
- Seek to regulate armed conflict through rules like the prohibition against military attacks on civilians
Crimes Against Humanity
- Includes large-scale human rights violations like genocide, apartheid, slavery, rape and torture
- They are inflicted wholesale
The Nuremberg Tribunal
- Established in 1945 by the London Agreement
- Treaty between France, the USSR, the UK, and the US to persecute major war criminals of the European Axis
- Twenty-one Nazi leaders tried
- Eleven received death sentences, seven received prison terms, and three were acquitted
Criticisms and Principles
- Manifestations of "victors' justice"
- Jurisprudential principles have included limitations on obeying orders and affirmation of nullen crimen sine lege
- Expressing fidelity to the principle of nullen crimen sine lege, asserting international law already forbade atrocities
Crimes within IMT Jurisdiction
Established by the London Agreement:
- Crimes against peace
- Crimes against humanity
- War crimes
- War crimes and crimes against humanity=the jus in bello
- Crimes against peace=the jus ad bellum
- The Nuremberg Tribunal was an international reckoning with the "final solution”
- The term genocide=not defined by treaty until the Genocide Convention in 1948
Nuremberg Statute (Article 6)
Included definitions of crimes within its juridiction.
- Crimes against peace encompassed "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties"
- War Crimes= "violations of the laws or customs of war, including murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor of civilian population. . . . killing of hostages, plunder, wanton destruction of cities "
- "Crimes against humanity, finally, meant “murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and inhumane acts against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds."
- The crime of aggression is not defined until 2010 Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
- The war crimes definition in Article 6(b) of the Nuremberg Statute remains an effective content distillation of customary international humanitarian law.
- Nuremberg's enumeration of war crimes was elaborated upon by the 1949 and Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols described in Chapter 2
Crimes Against Humanity: Article 6(c)
- Broadened since 1945
- Essential understanding= attacks on a "civilian population" has endured, Nuremberg's reference to “inhumane acts committed . . . before or during the war" has gradually been eliminated
- Still defined as communities wholesale attacks
- Connection to armed conflict= no longer necessary
- Consensus states genocide and other crimes against humanity sometimes occur in in time of war and sometimes do not have to occur as such
Ad Hoc Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda
- Tribunals that address specific times and situations
- International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY, or Yugoslavia Tribunal) established in 1993 by UN Security Council Resolution 827
- Like the Nuremberg Tribunal, the jurisdiction of the ICTY is limited both temporally and geographically
- Prosecutes responsible persons of serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991
- Unlike the Nuremberg Tribunal and the ICC, both the ICTY and its Rwanda sister tribunal lack constitutional treaties, and are instead creatures of the Security Council
Chapter VII Security Council Resolutions
- Resolutions=primary sources of international law because of explicit terms in the UN Charter
- Ad hoc tribunals=distinct from other transnational criminal tribunals due to their unique institutional structure and powers
Yugoslav Tribunal
- Charged over 160 individuals
- Convicted 60 offenders of international law, including war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity
- The conflict is viewed to had both international and internal dimensions.
- The war crimes provisions of the ICTY Statute apply specifically to interstate conflicts. Also concerns grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to violations of the Laws and Customs of War
- Definitions of war crimes draw in part from corresponding provisions of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I of 1977
- Statue prohibits wanton destruction of cities and similar civilian population of war
- Genocide, modeled after the Genocide Convention, includes specific acts committed with intent to destroy an ethnic or radical group
ICTY and Armed Conflict
- Article 5: links crimes against humanity to armed conflict, but is broader
- Listings inhumane acts such as murder, torture, enslavement, but can also prosecute such crimes under armed conflict
- Includes both interstate and international conflict in its scope of wartime atrocities- deemed as war crimes or crimes against humanity
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
- ICTR, or Rwanda Tribunal created by UN Security Council in aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide
- Occurred when there were between five hundred - one million killed Tutsi minority and alleged Hutu collaborators ultrasionalist Hutu militants.
- Tribunal mandated Individuals prosecuted "serious violations of international humanitarian law" commit in Rwanda and neighboring countries of 1994
- By November 2009, ICTR 30-one individuals had been convicted of genocide, other crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Six individuals were acquitted of same charges. Ten cases were pending appeal
- The Rwandan Tribunal in 1998*
- First international criminal secure a conviction for genocide
- Jean Kambanda, Rwanda's Prime Minister during the genocide of 1994 represented -two precedents as well,
- First genocide conviction against a former head of state and the first guilty plea in a genocide trial. Kambanda is currently being life sentence
- (2011), ICTR Woman guilty of war crimes in first trial
ICTR Statutes and war crimes
- Article sets forth an identical definition of Genocide to that of the ICTY Statutes
- However, the Rwanda focuses on violence of crimes against humanity and war crimes
- Because because violence Rwanda is characterized as war, the focus is on violations of Article 3, Common to the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol
- Crimes against Humanity before Rwanda were not limited to the contexts of armed conflict - murder, enslavement, torture, and other offenses when committed as a widespread systematic attack
- Rwanda definitatively got rid of war requirement of both Nuremberg and of Yugoslaw charts or crimes against humanity
The Special Court for Sierra Leone
- Upsurge of 70,000 belief people have to last their lives in civil Sierra Leone between 1991 and 1999:
- Government Sierra Leone/ insurgent Revoultionary UNited Front RUF signed peace agreement between Sierra Leone / RUF known Lome Peace etc
- UN security and government sierra in response in 2002 establish special court and special court to bear greatest responsibility serious violations of international international and Serra human 1999
- Ennactment following billet UN and Leione
- UN Security Council, in 2002, the parties enacted Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone includes structure/substansive crimes withing jurisdiction
- Thirteen individuals have been indicted by the SCSL, including five commanders of the RUF/ civil defense CDFs/four high members AFRCs
- Charles Taylor was under 13th Idct
- Of there defendants special the special court conicted 8
- Is unique for conviction from both insurgent and goverment affilated;
- A majority indedicted bby the ICC have been affiliated with rebel movements those found with rebels, those governments officials are not in ICC custody
Special Court Unique Aspects
- UNs endorsed limits
- The court prosecution in high rank members
- Limited to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and certain law violation
- Did not include genecide lack of evidence
With regard to the statutes
- War crimes are referred mainly in of violation common/ additional
- Since internal grave breaches are not it jurisdiction
- Other other serious humanitarian
- Also can do wholesale/Rwandan tribunal is not and no context war
- empowered Try exploitatation
- 15 + if crimes alleged
- Treat the child with accountabilty
- Special help if coming before it
International Criminal Court
- The Rome of ICC was adopted in 1998 into force 2002
- Grave, which shock the consience of humanity
- Four groups genocide/aggression /crimes to humanity/war
- Although Aggresssion of 1998 it amendments made in 2010 and an acts against the United Nations Charter occupation violation
- Seperate separate defferrement till no later than 2017
- The Original of ICC
Genocide: Article 6/ tracks other definitions
7 Main parts
- 8 Comprehensive
- Breaches Geneva
- Violations
- Yugoslav/Rwanda
- Not inter vs inter
- Preconditions to exercise etc 1
Rome Statutes Impactful
- Can try crimes
- Accuse must be party
- State party refer
- Prio Motoe
- 2 factors • InAdmissiblity
- Keller agrues - sub rosa, recognition by statue may
- Can still be due to sufficient gravity.
-
- Non prosecution, security council/double. Jeapory
Uganda War
- Controverisal, within Ciz society, not only due to no officers, but arrest. Non govs, distractions and social policy
- Gov, Uganda call for suspension. First objective will be to invesitgate.
- ICD of high court with domesticate
Juba
- Experience of SCL, so little funds;
- Rhetorically?
- The other, something...
Burundi
- DRC has had issues, conflict for yrs
- Millions died/internap/ mineres/. Factions have
- The government for ICC on APril
Conclusion
Was ICC Prosecutor
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.