Review of Related Literature (RRL)

A literature review primarily focuses on providing a detailed critique of individual research papers rather than summarizing the overall state of knowledge.

The primary goal of a literature review is to present only supporting evidence for the researcher's hypothesis, while ignoring conflicting findings.

A literature review should only include studies that directly confirm the researcher's initial assumptions.

A comprehensive literature review only summarizes existing research without identifying gaps or suggesting areas for future research.

A well-constructed literature review exclusively focuses on studies with statistically significant findings, disregarding those with non-significant results.

The theoretical framework of a research study should be entirely independent of the literature review.

A literature review is simply a list of summarized articles and books, and does not require organization or synthesis of information.

A good literature review should provide a historical background of the research topic.

A literature review should primarily rely on interpretations of previous studies rather than engaging with the original research reports.

When conducting a literature review, it is acceptable to exclusively focus on research originating from developed countries, as these studies often represent the most rigorous and applicable findings.

The literature review section should exclude any discussion of the model or framework used in the study.

The initial step in conducting a literature review involves refining your research question rather than identifying keywords.

The main body of a literature review should consist of a mere listing of research papers, devoid of any analysis or synthesis of findings.

In literature reviews, objectivity is achieved by presenting a synthesis of different viewpoints without taking a stance.

The conclusion of a literature review should introduce new arguments and evidence to further expand the research topic.

A good literature review primarily aims to summarize individual studies in isolation, rather than synthesizing them to identify overarching themes and gaps in the research.

Goldberg and Gorn's 1974 study aimed to assess if targeted television segments embedded within 'Sesame Street' could cultivate more positive sentiments among children toward diverse races in Canada, with a specific emphasis on influencing behaviors.

The inserts designed by Goldberg and Gorn intentionally showcased integrated settings featuring children from diverse racial backgrounds interacting to promote inclusivity.

Goldberg and Gorn assumed that the key factor influencing attitudes was the integrated nature of the inserts, highlighting interactions between racial groups.

In the French Canadian insert, the researchers discovered the children's liking for the French Canadian child decreased significantly when he spoke French, indicating a language-based bias.

The 1974 Goldberg and Gorn study was executed in Europe.

The researchers in the Goldberg and Gorn study found that children paid more attention to the auditory elements of the program than the visual elements when viewing the inserts.

The primary goal of the 'Sesame Street' inserts was to foster a deeper appreciation for mathematical literacy among young viewers, with a secondary focus on cultural sensitivity.

The researchers in the mentioned study primarily utilized subjective observations and anecdotal evidence, rather than employing rigorous statistical analyses, to draw conclusions regarding the impact of the inserts.

In the experiment described, a classroom with a harsh disciplinary approach represents low classroom structure.

The research utilized 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood' episodes and neutral films to measure the effects of certain classroom conditions.

One experimental group watched pro-social television without any additional support such as play materials or teacher involvement.

The study exclusively examined the impact of pro-social television on children's academic performance.

The study involved manipulating classroom structure and media exposure to assess children's social interactions.

The classroom condition of low structure was defined by teachers showing more warmth and a punitive atmosphere.

According to the study, pro-social television combined with play materials and teacher involvement was particularly effective under a low classroom structure.

The experiment involved only two groups of children, differing only in the type of program viewed.

Literature Review

Purpose of Literature Review

Organizing Literature

Theoretical Framework

Historical Background

Present Relevant Materials

Research Instruments

Theoretical Framework Development

Goldberg and Gorn Study

Goldberg and Gorn Conclusion

Stein and Susman Study (1975)

Stein and Susman's Aim

Environmental Impact on TV Effects

Respondents in Stein and Susman

Experimental Treatments

First Treatment Condition

Goldberg & Gorn (1974) Aim

Goldberg & Gorn (1974) Inserts

Reasons for Expected Response

Observation About Attention

Reaction to French Canadian Child

Racial attitude changes

Research problem

Describing the procedures

Literature Review Summary

Error: Secondary Sources Only

Error: Findings Focus Only

Error: Overlooking Diverse Sources

5 Steps of Literature Review

Literature Review: Introduction

Literature Review: Main Body

Literature Review: Conclusion

Literature Review (RRL)

Materials & Procedures

Experimental Conditions

Variables Measured

Operationalized Definition

Classroom Structure

Positive Social Interaction

Pro-social Television