quiz image

Equity and Trusts Case List Quiz

TopNotchSavanna avatar
TopNotchSavanna
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

40 Questions

What is the essential element of proprietary estoppel?

The claimant must have relied on the defendant's representation to their detriment.

In Earl of Chesterfield v Janssen (1750), what type of fraud was considered?

Equitable fraud

What is the primary difference between actual and presumed undue influence?

Actual undue influence is proven by evidence, while presumed undue influence is assumed based on the relationship.

What is the result of undue influence in a transaction?

The transaction is considered voidable.

In Williams v Bailey (1866), what was the court's decision regarding undue influence?

The court held that undue influence is a matter of fact.

What is the purpose of the doctrine of proprietary estoppel?

To provide a remedy for the claimant when they have relied on the defendant's representation to their detriment.

What is the significance of the Earl of Chesterfield v Janssen (1750) case?

It established the court's jurisdiction to relieve against every species of fraud.

What is the primary requirement for proving undue influence?

The defendant must have had the capacity to influence the claimant.

What is the main purpose of the concept of presumed undue influence in law?

To prevent victimization and ensure fair dealings

What is the key difference between presumed undue influence and actual undue influence?

Presumed undue influence is based on public policy, while actual undue influence is based on the context of the situation

What is the significance of independent advice in the context of presumed undue influence?

It can rebut the presumption of undue influence

What was the outcome of the Lloyds Bank v Bundy case?

The court ruled in favor of the bank, and Bundy was evicted from the house

What was the role of the lawyers from the bank in the Lloyds Bank v Bundy case?

They explained the terms of the document to Bundy, and he signed it voluntarily

What was the extent of Herbert James Bundy's estate?

He owned a house, which was the extent of his estate

What was the reason for Bundy's decision to sign the document using his house as collateral?

He wanted to help his son's business, and saw this as the only way

What is the significance of the Lloyds Bank v Bundy case in the context of undue influence?

It highlighted the importance of independent advice in financial transactions

What is the key factor in determining whether a lender can rely on a security given by a wife in a surety transaction?

The lender's knowledge of the husband-wife relationship

What is the primary approach used in Barclays Bank v O'Brien to address equitable wrongdoing in surety transactions?

The constructive notice approach

What is the term used to describe a situation where a lender has knowledge of a relationship between the surety and the debtor that may indicate undue influence?

Put on inquiry

What is the consequence for a lender that fails to take reasonable steps to ensure they are not bound by equitable wrongdoing?

The lender is bound by the equity and cannot enforce the security

What is the term used to describe a situation where a lender has direct knowledge of wrongdoing in a surety transaction?

Actual notice

What is the key factor in determining whether a lender has taken reasonable steps to ensure they are not bound by equitable wrongdoing?

The lender's policy of requiring independent legal advice for the surety

What is the consequence for a lender that takes reasonable steps to ensure they are not bound by equitable wrongdoing?

The lender is not bound by the equity and can enforce the security

What is the term used to describe a situation where a lender is aware of a transaction that requires an explanation due to the relationship between the surety and the debtor?

Transaction that calls for an explanation

What is the basis of equitable tracing?

Possession of an equitable interest

What is the primary factor in determining property rights in the law of property?

Fixed rules and settled principles

What is the outcome if a beneficiary's property rights are traced to its proceeds?

The beneficiary's interest binds everyone who takes the property or its proceeds

What is the key characteristic of fiduciary relationships?

A relationship where one person has a special opportunity to exercise power or discretion

Why is the person to whom the duty is owed vulnerable to abuse?

Because the fiduciary has the opportunity to exercise power or discretion to their detriment

What is the purpose of tracing in equity?

To ensure that profits are returned to the beneficiary

What is the relationship between tracing and the law of unjust enrichment?

There is no connection between tracing and the law of unjust enrichment

In which type of relationships do fiduciary duties typically arise?

Trustees, solicitors, and agents

What is not sufficient by itself to give rise to fiduciary obligations?

A high degree of mutual trust and confidence

What is the exception to the beneficiary's interest binding everyone who takes the property or its traceable proceeds?

A bona fide purchaser for value without notice

What is the status of tracing in the law of property?

Tracing is neither a claim nor a remedy

In which country can doctors be held to fiduciary standards in relation to their patients?

Canada

What is the significance of Foskett v McKeown (2000) in the context of tracing?

It highlighted the role of tracing in third-party cases

What is the primary reason why the fiduciary comes under a duty to exercise their power or discretion in the interests of the other person?

Because the fiduciary has the power to affect the interests of the other person

What is the implication of a fiduciary's exercise of power or discretion?

It can affect the interests of the other person in a legal or practical sense

What is the exception to the typical fiduciary duties arising from relationships?

Exceptional cases where fiduciary duties arise outside of typical relationships

Test your understanding of proprietary estoppel through the case of Thorner v Major, where the claimant worked on the defendant's estate without pay, believing he would inherit the land. Review the details of the case and the argument made by the claimant.

Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards

Convert your notes into interactive study material.

Get started for free

More Quizzes Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser