Podcast Beta
Questions and Answers
What is the primary goal of the multiple oppositions approach in treating phonological disorders?
In the context of phonological therapy, what does a 'collapse of phonemes' indicate?
Which therapy session planning method is specifically used to summarize therapy results?
What principle is NOT associated with the multiple oppositions approach?
Signup and view all the answers
Which characteristic distinguishes the cycles approach from the multiple oppositions approach?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary focus of the maximal oppositions approach?
Signup and view all the answers
Which dimension is NOT considered in the maximal oppositions approach when selecting word pairs?
Signup and view all the answers
In what aspect does the maximal oppositions approach differ from minimal pairs therapy?
Signup and view all the answers
When categorizing phonemes in the maximal oppositions approach, which pair represents a major class feature difference?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is a guideline utilized in the target selection for the maximal oppositions approach?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Multiple Oppositions Approach
- The multiple oppositions approach is a contrastive approach that targets several error sounds that are represented in a collapse of phonemes.
- A collapse of phonemes occurs when a child substitutes one sound for several different target sounds.
- The approach works by contrasting the error sound with several target sounds, creating multiple sets of minimal pairs. This helps the child systematically reorganize their phonological system.
- For example, if a child substitutes [t] for [k, s, ʃ, ʧ], the words two, coo, sue, shoe, and chew, would all be produced as [tu].
- The multiple oppositions approach is an adaptation of minimal pairs, which focuses on word pairs that differ by one phoneme.
Minimal Pairs/Minimal Oppositions Approach
- The minimal pairs approach focuses on the differences in meaning created by different phonemes.
- The approach uses word pairs that differ by one phoneme to highlight the change in meaning caused by the error.
- For example, a child may say [ti] for tea, but also for see, demonstrating a lack of understanding how sounds create meaning.
- The minimal oppositions approach expands on the minimal pairs approach by emphasizing the specific ways in which contrasted word pairs are different.
- The approach considers three key dimensions when choosing word pairs:
- Major class features: Distinguishing between sonorants and obstruents (e.g., /s/ as an obstruent vs. /r/ as a sonorant).
- Nonmajor class features of distinctive features or place-manner-voicing: The number of distinctive features by which two sounds differ (e.g., /k/ and /l/ differ by eight features).
- Phonetic inventory: Whether one or both sounds in the pair are in the child's phonetic inventory.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore two effective phonological approaches: the Multiple Oppositions Approach and the Minimal Pairs Approach. This quiz delves into how these methods can help children reorganize their phonological systems by contrasting error sounds with target sounds. Test your understanding of these concepts and their applications in speech therapy.
