Podcast
Questions and Answers
In a deductive argument, what is the purpose of accepting the premises as true?
In a deductive argument, what is the purpose of accepting the premises as true?
- To draw specific conclusions that cannot be denied (correct)
- To question the validity of the conclusions
- To challenge the reasoning process
- To introduce empirical evidence to support the argument
What is the term used for knowledge gained without any prior empirical evidence?
What is the term used for knowledge gained without any prior empirical evidence?
- Empirical knowledge
- A-posteriori knowledge
- A-priori knowledge (correct)
- Inductive knowledge
In the given example of accepting the right syllabus, what type of knowledge is being demonstrated?
In the given example of accepting the right syllabus, what type of knowledge is being demonstrated?
- Inductive knowledge
- A-priori knowledge (correct)
- Empirical knowledge
- A-posteriori knowledge
According to Anselm's ontological argument, what is the premise about the nature of God?
According to Anselm's ontological argument, what is the premise about the nature of God?
In Anselm's ontological argument, what does he compare the existence of God to in order to illustrate its 'reality'?
In Anselm's ontological argument, what does he compare the existence of God to in order to illustrate its 'reality'?
What is Anselm's argument regarding the 'greatest' form of God's existence?
What is Anselm's argument regarding the 'greatest' form of God's existence?
According to Malcolm's argument, why is the existence of God considered 'necessary'?
According to Malcolm's argument, why is the existence of God considered 'necessary'?
Why does Malcolm argue that if God doesn't exist, His existence would be impossible?
Why does Malcolm argue that if God doesn't exist, His existence would be impossible?
How does Malcolm justify that God is either 'necessary' or 'completely impossible'?
How does Malcolm justify that God is either 'necessary' or 'completely impossible'?
According to Kant’s criticism, why cannot one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being be existence?
According to Kant’s criticism, why cannot one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being be existence?
How does Kant criticize the definitions of the nature of God put forth by Anselm, Descartes, and Malcolm?
How does Kant criticize the definitions of the nature of God put forth by Anselm, Descartes, and Malcolm?
What makes A-priori knowledge, as used in the ontological argument, stronger than A-posteriori knowledge according to the text?
What makes A-priori knowledge, as used in the ontological argument, stronger than A-posteriori knowledge according to the text?
According to Descartes, what is one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being?
According to Descartes, what is one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being?
Based on Malcolm's definition of God, why cannot God have a shape?
Based on Malcolm's definition of God, why cannot God have a shape?
How does Descartes' argument differ from Malcolm's Ontological Argument?
How does Descartes' argument differ from Malcolm's Ontological Argument?
According to Anselm's ontological argument, why must God exist in reality?
According to Anselm's ontological argument, why must God exist in reality?
What was Anselm's additional goal, besides proving the existence of God, in his ontological argument?
What was Anselm's additional goal, besides proving the existence of God, in his ontological argument?
What does Rene Descartes' ontological argument revolve around?
What does Rene Descartes' ontological argument revolve around?
According to Gaunilo, why is Anselm's ontological argument deductively/logically ridiculous?
According to Gaunilo, why is Anselm's ontological argument deductively/logically ridiculous?
How did Anselm respond to Gaunilo's criticism related to the greatest island?
How did Anselm respond to Gaunilo's criticism related to the greatest island?
What was Immanuel Kant's criticism of Descartes' ontological argument?
What was Immanuel Kant's criticism of Descartes' ontological argument?
Which type of knowledge is considered to be open to error due to the possibility of our senses deceiving us?
Which type of knowledge is considered to be open to error due to the possibility of our senses deceiving us?
Which philosopher provided an example to demonstrate the absurdity of a-priori knowledge?
Which philosopher provided an example to demonstrate the absurdity of a-priori knowledge?
Which attribute does the God of classical theism, as associated with major western based religions, NOT possess?
Which attribute does the God of classical theism, as associated with major western based religions, NOT possess?
Why would single definitions of God fail in Hinduism?
Why would single definitions of God fail in Hinduism?
Study Notes
Deductive Arguments
- Accepting the premises as true allows for the logical deduction of conclusions.
Types of Knowledge
- A-priori knowledge is gained without any prior empirical evidence.
- A-posteriori knowledge is open to error due to the possibility of our senses deceiving us.
Anselm's Ontological Argument
- According to Anselm, God's existence is a necessary predicate of a supremely perfect being.
- Anselm compares the existence of God to a perfect island, illustrating its 'reality'.
- Anselm argues that God exists both in the understanding and in reality.
- Anselm's additional goal was to demonstrate the rationality of faith.
Criticisms of Anselm's Argument
- Gaunilo argued that Anselm's ontological argument is deductively/logically ridiculous.
- Anselm responded to Gaunilo's criticism by stating that the greatest island is a concept, not a reality.
Malcolm's Argument
- According to Malcolm, God's existence is necessary because it is impossible for God not to exist.
- Malcolm argues that if God doesn't exist, His existence would be impossible, making His existence necessary.
- Malcolm justifies that God is either necessary or completely impossible.
Kant's Criticism
- Kant criticizes Anselm, Descartes, and Malcolm's definitions of God by stating that existence cannot be a predicate of a supremely perfect being.
- Kant argues that A-priori knowledge is stronger than A-posteriori knowledge.
Descartes' Argument
- Descartes argues that existence is one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being.
- Descartes' argument differs from Malcolm's in its approach to the ontological argument.
Classical Theism
- The God of classical theism, as associated with major Western-based religions, possesses all attributes except shape.
- Single definitions of God fail in Hinduism due to the diverse nature of Hindu deities.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your understanding of Kant's concept of predicates of existence and their relationship with the nature of objects. Explore examples like triangles and unicorns to grasp the philosophical ideas.