Philosophy: Kant's Predicate of Existence Quiz
25 Questions
6 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In a deductive argument, what is the purpose of accepting the premises as true?

  • To draw specific conclusions that cannot be denied (correct)
  • To question the validity of the conclusions
  • To challenge the reasoning process
  • To introduce empirical evidence to support the argument
  • What is the term used for knowledge gained without any prior empirical evidence?

  • Empirical knowledge
  • A-posteriori knowledge
  • A-priori knowledge (correct)
  • Inductive knowledge
  • In the given example of accepting the right syllabus, what type of knowledge is being demonstrated?

  • Inductive knowledge
  • A-priori knowledge (correct)
  • Empirical knowledge
  • A-posteriori knowledge
  • According to Anselm's ontological argument, what is the premise about the nature of God?

    <p>God is 'That Than Which Nothing Greater Can Be Conceived'</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Anselm's ontological argument, what does he compare the existence of God to in order to illustrate its 'reality'?

    <p>A cream bun</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is Anselm's argument regarding the 'greatest' form of God's existence?

    <p>It is greater for God to exist in reality and the mind than only in the mind/imagination</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Malcolm's argument, why is the existence of God considered 'necessary'?

    <p>Because God is not dependent on anything else for His existence, and nothing can make Him cease to exist, so there are no limits on Him.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why does Malcolm argue that if God doesn't exist, His existence would be impossible?

    <p>Because nothing can bring God into existence in the future without limiting Him, and as an unlimited being, He cannot be limited.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does Malcolm justify that God is either 'necessary' or 'completely impossible'?

    <p>By arguing that the concept of God's existence is not self-contradictory and does not lead to any absurd conclusions, making it necessary.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Kant’s criticism, why cannot one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being be existence?

    <p>Existence is not a predicate of anything, as it does not alter the nature of something whether it exists or not.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does Kant criticize the definitions of the nature of God put forth by Anselm, Descartes, and Malcolm?

    <p>He argues that their definitions need to be empirically proven, but they failed to do so.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What makes A-priori knowledge, as used in the ontological argument, stronger than A-posteriori knowledge according to the text?

    <p>A-priori knowledge is based on unemotional logic and cannot be swayed by subjective influences.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Descartes, what is one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being?

    <p>Infinite existence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Based on Malcolm's definition of God, why cannot God have a shape?

    <p>It limits God by defining outer boundaries</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does Descartes' argument differ from Malcolm's Ontological Argument?

    <p>Descartes focuses on the nature of God, while Malcolm focuses on the existence of God</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Anselm's ontological argument, why must God exist in reality?

    <p>Because God is the greatest and therefore must exist in reality.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Anselm's additional goal, besides proving the existence of God, in his ontological argument?

    <p>To demonstrate that God is a necessary being.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Rene Descartes' ontological argument revolve around?

    <p>The idea that a supremely perfect being possesses every attribute in its perfect state.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Gaunilo, why is Anselm's ontological argument deductively/logically ridiculous?

    <p>Because it claims that anything described from the mind as the greatest must also exist in reality, which Gaunilo argues is absurd.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did Anselm respond to Gaunilo's criticism related to the greatest island?

    <p>By asserting that his argument only applies to God and not to anything else, such as an island.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Immanuel Kant's criticism of Descartes' ontological argument?

    <p>Existence is not a predicate/essence of anything.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which type of knowledge is considered to be open to error due to the possibility of our senses deceiving us?

    <p>A-posteriori knowledge</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which philosopher provided an example to demonstrate the absurdity of a-priori knowledge?

    <p>Bertrand Russell</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which attribute does the God of classical theism, as associated with major western based religions, NOT possess?

    <p>Polytheism</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why would single definitions of God fail in Hinduism?

    <p>Because Hinduism believes in multiple gods with varied attributes</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Deductive Arguments

    • Accepting the premises as true allows for the logical deduction of conclusions.

    Types of Knowledge

    • A-priori knowledge is gained without any prior empirical evidence.
    • A-posteriori knowledge is open to error due to the possibility of our senses deceiving us.

    Anselm's Ontological Argument

    • According to Anselm, God's existence is a necessary predicate of a supremely perfect being.
    • Anselm compares the existence of God to a perfect island, illustrating its 'reality'.
    • Anselm argues that God exists both in the understanding and in reality.
    • Anselm's additional goal was to demonstrate the rationality of faith.

    Criticisms of Anselm's Argument

    • Gaunilo argued that Anselm's ontological argument is deductively/logically ridiculous.
    • Anselm responded to Gaunilo's criticism by stating that the greatest island is a concept, not a reality.

    Malcolm's Argument

    • According to Malcolm, God's existence is necessary because it is impossible for God not to exist.
    • Malcolm argues that if God doesn't exist, His existence would be impossible, making His existence necessary.
    • Malcolm justifies that God is either necessary or completely impossible.

    Kant's Criticism

    • Kant criticizes Anselm, Descartes, and Malcolm's definitions of God by stating that existence cannot be a predicate of a supremely perfect being.
    • Kant argues that A-priori knowledge is stronger than A-posteriori knowledge.

    Descartes' Argument

    • Descartes argues that existence is one of the predicates/essences of a supremely perfect being.
    • Descartes' argument differs from Malcolm's in its approach to the ontological argument.

    Classical Theism

    • The God of classical theism, as associated with major Western-based religions, possesses all attributes except shape.
    • Single definitions of God fail in Hinduism due to the diverse nature of Hindu deities.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Test your understanding of Kant's concept of predicates of existence and their relationship with the nature of objects. Explore examples like triangles and unicorns to grasp the philosophical ideas.

    More Like This

    Kant's Predicates and Existence
    65 questions
    Philosophy of Descartes and Kant
    40 questions
    Philosophy of Self: Hume, Kant, and Ryle
    40 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser