Oral Advocacy in Immigration Hearings

The opportunity to present a case before a decision-maker at the end of a hearing or interview.

The stage at which the lawyer lays out their argument, connecting evidence and law to support their client's claim.

The organization responsible for enforcing immigration laws, processing applications and conducting interviews.

The legal body that makes decisions on refugee claims in Canada.

A legal term referring to someone making a claim for refugee status.

The legal requirements that a claimant must meet to succeed with their case.

The crucial stage where lawyers need to present their strongest case

A combination of evidence, law and argument that supports a client's claim.

The initial part of an oral argument where you introduce the main points and the overall argument.

Presenting key facts or evidence that support your client's case, highlighting why your client should receive a favorable result.

Explaining how the law you've presented applies to your client's specific situation.

Presenting a clear and concise summary of your argument, emphasizing key points and the legal reasoning behind your client's position.

The final part of an oral argument that reiterates key points and emphasizes the desired outcome for your client.

Presenting only the facts directly relevant to the case, not the whole story. Focus on the facts your client must prove or the issue at hand.

A compelling summary of your argument. It effectively conveys your strong arguments, but also welcomes questions and engages in a dialogue.

Questions from the tribunal during oral argument are positive signals. They show the decision maker is listening and interested in your case.

Always be ready to address any specific questions from the decision maker immediately and directly. Never evade or delay your response.

Don't exaggerate or misrepresent the evidence or the law. Maintaining accuracy is crucial for credibility.

A concise conclusion reaffirming your request to the decision maker and highlighting your desired outcome.

Be prepared to adjust your argument delivery based on the decision maker's questions and interests. Flexibility is essential.

Don't overstate or misrepresent facts or law. Accuracy is paramount for effective advocacy.

An oral argument that actively engages the decision-maker, prompting them to think, ask questions, and be invested in the case.

An oral argument that leaves the decision-maker passive and uninterested, failing to capture their attention and inspire critical thinking.

A clear and concise message that the listener can take away from the oral argument, serving as a central idea or theme.

A compelling and persuasive explanation that connects the evidence and law to support the client's position.

Conveying a sense of confidence and mastery over the case and related laws, creating a sense of trust in the practitioner.

Feeling anxious before a presentation is normal. It's a sign you care about doing well.

Speaking naturally and having a conversation during an oral argument helps connect with the audience.

Don't assume the decision-maker knows everything about your case. Treat it like a fresh start.

Going over your allotted time in an oral argument can harm your credibility and make the decision-maker lose trust in your presentation.

Practice your oral arguments in front of a mirror or even your pet to refine your delivery and confidence.

A disaster in an oral argument can be caused by misinterpreting facts, misapplying legal principles, or exceeding the time limit.

Oral advocacy is a skill that requires practice and learning. It's not just a set of rules.

Good luck to you! You can achieve success through practice, preparation, and time.