Nativist Approaches to Language Acquisition
45 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What do constructivists argue regarding children's language acquisition?

  • Children learn language solely through imitation.
  • Children set parameters incorrectly from the beginning.
  • Comprehension and production are loosely connected. (correct)
  • Children's understanding of subject-verb-object is always accurate.
  • What is a theoretical problem associated with Universal Grammar (UG)?

  • The number and characteristics of parameters remain ambiguous. (correct)
  • It can purely explain bilingualism without issues.
  • The parameters related to language are clearly defined.
  • Children consistently avoid setting parameters incorrectly.
  • Based on the content, how does bilingualism complicate the understanding of language parameters?

  • It ensures children have a singular grasp of language structure.
  • It simplifies parameter setting.
  • It increases the number of language rules.
  • It raises questions about setting the same parameters for multiple languages. (correct)
  • What do naturalistic data studies suggest about children's language knowledge?

    <p>Knowledge of verbs, auxiliaries, and determiners tends to be lexically specific.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement accurately reflects a feature of children's language learning as indicated in studies?

    <p>What children hear influences both the timing and nature of what they learn.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which language is the word order typically Object-Verb?

    <p>Japanese</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the concept of Universal Grammar primarily help explain?

    <p>The acquisition of complex grammatical rules</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is an indication that children understand word order?

    <p>They point to the correct picture after hearing a sentence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which language is the subject often optional as per the content?

    <p>Italian</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What empirical evidence supports the principles and parameters theory?

    <p>Children's utterances conform to adult language structure</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What age did studies suggest children can recognize Subject-Verb-Object sentence structures?

    <p>From 2 years</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a parameter setting discussed?

    <p>Tense formation</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do preferential looking studies primarily measure in children?

    <p>Awareness of grammatical rules</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do nativist approaches assume about children's language acquisition?

    <p>Children have an innate ability specific to language.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which term is associated with the innate linguistic capability proposed in nativist theories?

    <p>Language Acquisition Device</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one assumption of 'maturation' accounts of language acquisition?

    <p>Children learn language at a fixed developmental pace regardless of experience.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is meant by 'the linking problem' in relation to language acquisition?

    <p>The issue of correlating language input with children's output.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement best represents a strength of nativist approaches?

    <p>They explain the rapid acquisition of complex grammatical structures.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do nativists believe about children's utterances?

    <p>They are creative due to access to innate grammatical rules.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to nativist theories, how do children create sentences?

    <p>By using innate rules and generalizations specific to language.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which theory posits that children learn language patterns from their environment?

    <p>Constructivist theory</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a common criticism of nativist approaches?

    <p>They fail to account for the complexity of language variation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How do nativists explain children's observation of adult word order?

    <p>They have access to an abstract rule of Subject-Verb-Object.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the concept of Universal Grammar refer to?

    <p>The idea that all languages share a common structural basis.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do constructivists believe about children's generalizations in language?

    <p>They gradually learn these patterns from distributional analysis.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key assumption of nativist approaches to language acquisition?

    <p>Grammar is a symbolic computational system processing abstract relationships.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which example best supports the Constructivist perspective on language acquisition?

    <p>Children's speech is largely comprised of phrases learned from adults.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'Principles & Parameters' refer to in the context of nativist theories?

    <p>The innate grammatical structures present at birth.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do constructivists argue about the role of frequency in language input?

    <p>High-frequency lexical frames affect children’s understanding of grammar.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do nativist approaches suggest about children's early multiword utterances?

    <p>They resemble adult language in structure.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key characteristic of continuity accounts in language development?

    <p>They suggest that limitations are due to performance rather than knowledge.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Radford's maturational model, what characterizes the Lexical Stage of development?

    <p>Children's utterances consist primarily of content words.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    At which age does the Functional Stage of language development typically occur according to Radford?

    <p>Around 24 months.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What transformation occurs during the transition from the Lexical Stage to the Functional Stage?

    <p>Auxiliary verbs and determiners begin to be used.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do maturational models suggest about the development of Universal Grammar (UG) in children?

    <p>UG matures according to a defined biological timetable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What evidence supports the view that children do not start with full innate knowledge according to maturational models?

    <p>The distinct stages of language development observed over time.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following components are children's utterances missing at the Lexical Stage?

    <p>Function words and grammatical parts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do nativist approaches primarily claim about children's language acquisition?

    <p>Children possess innate abstract universal grammar.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is Semantic Bootstrapping proposed to explain?

    <p>How children use their perceptual understanding of the world to link words to grammatical categories.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the Linking Problem in language acquisition?

    <p>The issue of how children associate language they hear with their innate grammatical knowledge.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which account assumes that parts of the grammatical system activate at various developmental stages?

    <p>Maturational accounts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What evidence raises questions about the existence of innate abstract knowledge in children?

    <p>Children’s improved performance in comprehension tasks compared to production tasks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do continuity accounts suggest about children's grammatical knowledge?

    <p>Children start out with full grammatical knowledge from the beginning.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of examination format will be used to assess the material covered in this lecture?

    <p>Multiple-choice questions and short answer format</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes innate grammar from gradual learning in the context of language acquisition?

    <p>Innate grammar is believed to be present before any exposure to language.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Early Multi-Word Speech: Nativist Approaches

    • Nativist (generativist) approaches contrast with constructivist approaches
    • Nativists believe children are born with innate language acquisition mechanisms (Language Acquisition Device, or Universal Grammar), enabling them to learn language
    • Steven Pinker's research supports Universal Grammar, highlighting children's use of language rules and generalizations from the start of speech
    • Early language development demonstrates observable similarities to adult language.

    Learning Objectives

    • Students should outline the assumptions of nativist accounts of language acquisition
    • They should outline the assumptions of maturation accounts which explain language acquisition
    • They should describe and explain the linking problem, providing one proposed solution
    • Students must evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of nativist approaches.

    Lecture Structure

    • Part A: Background on nativist vs constructivist approaches
    • Part B: Examining nativist approaches to language acquisition, focusing on Principles & Parameters (P&P)
    • Part C: Discussing maturational models of language acquisition.
    • Part D: Identifying and analyzing the linking problem

    Nativist Assumptions

    • Grammar is a symbolic computational system processing relationships between abstract variables
    • Grammatical categories and rules are innate, present from birth (Universal Grammar)
    • The acquisition of grammar is an all-or-nothing process where assimilated items inherit category privileges
    • Examples include how, as soon as 'cat' is understood as a noun, it immediately adopts the privileges of other nouns

    General Predictions

    • Children should acquire innately specified aspects of grammar very early
    • Children exhibit consistent treatment of members within the same grammatical category,

    The Nature of UG: Principles & Parameters

    • All possible language rules are innate to humans
    • Grammar is universal
    • Differences in grammar across languages stem from parameter settings

    Examples of Parameter Settings

    • Word order (e.g., Verb-Object vs. Object-Verb in English and Japanese)
    • Subject use (obligatory vs. optional in different languages)

    Theoretical Advantages of UG

    • Solves the problem of explaining complex grammatical rule acquisition across languages
    • Offers a unified theory of acquisition across languages, explaining how those languages differ

    Empirical Evidence for Principles & Parameters

    • Children's early utterances typically adhere to adult word order, suggesting relevant parameters are set
    • Early language production (e.g., "allgone sticky") displays evidence of grammatical rules
    • Studies on comprehension (e.g. looking/pointing tasks), particularly when using known words but not with unfamiliar ones, also support these ideas
    • Children at 18-24 months are capable of identifying the correct pictures to match subject-verb-object sentences

    Theoretical Problems for UG

    • Parameters are not clearly specified; the exact number and nature remain uncertain
    • The details of which aspects of language are encoded by parameters are likewise uncertain
    • The potential of incorrect parameter setting is not addressed
    • Explanations for bilingualism and other language learning complications are not addressed

    Empirical Evidence against P&P

    • Children show restricted SVO word order knowledge in production and act-out tasks
    • Naturalistic studies reveal partial knowledge of specifically lexical grammatical categories, such as verbs, auxiliaries, and determiners
    • The relationship between children's input, frequency, and learning of grammatical structures is well supported in numerous studies

    Interim Summary

    • Nativists explain early multi-word utterances through an emphasis on their similarities to adult language
    • Nativists discuss how grammatical rules are presented from the beginning
    • Maturational accounts attempt to explain the development of language while maintaining the existence of innate knowledge

    Part C: Maturational Models

    • Children's language evolves over time, suggesting initial language structures aren't wholly innate but mature over time
    • One model proposes that a portion of Universal Grammar matures over a biologically determined timescale

    Radford's (1990) Maturational Model

    • Children's earliest stages of speech primarily utilize content words (nouns, verbs, etc.)
    • At around 24 months, more complex grammatical components, such as auxiliary verbs, indicators, and inflections, begin to appear

    Distinct Stages of Development

    • Tables listing lexical (early) and functional (later) utterances present in young children illustrate speech maturation stages

    Theoretical Advantages & Evidence

    • Maturational models explain why early utterances are often not grammatically complete
    • The approach is compatible with empirical data due to its allowance for development over time
    • Language development trajectories in other groups (e.g. deaf/blind) are similar to typically-developing children

    Theoretical & Empirical Problems

    • Identifying precise developmental points where grammatical mechanisms become functional is difficult
    • Early stages of language use show some grammatical functions, however, the consistency and prevalence vary across languages
    • Children's use of many functional words (e.g. auxiliaries and quantifiers) related to lexical frames becomes apparent around the time of their 24th month

    Interim Summary

    • UG approaches claim innate abstract grammar but explain development in terms of biological maturation.
    • The issue of how grammatical development and experience interact is examined.

    Part D: The Linking Problem

    • Explores how children connect knowledge of grammatical categories with encountered words/language
    • Caregivers often do not label specific grammar elements (nouns, verbs) with words
    • This problem demands a connection between innate grammatical structure and observed language

    A Proposed Solution - Semantic Bootstrapping

    • Based on the idea children utilize semantic (meaning) knowledge to link input words to innate syntactic categories guided by innate linking rules.
    • Children relate word meanings to innate grammatical categories using semantic understanding.

    Relations Between Grammatical Categories & Meaning

    • Tables mapping words (e.g., dog, kick, car) to their corresponding grammatical categories.

    Examples of Linking Rules Between Meaning & Syntax

    • Word/utterance meaning is related to grammatical categories in tables
    • Linking rules match semantic roles (agent, patient; word roles) to word positions

    How Does Linking Work?

    • An example of how linking innate linguistic knowledge and input can determine word order

    Grammatical Categories

    • Tables illustrate the categories of words (e.g., want, idea, think, see, problem, pain) and their grammatical classifications

    The Problem of Passives

    • Passive voice in language presents challenges for semantic bootstrapping
    • Certain grammatical structures may be challenging for younger children to interpret or produce semantically.

    Interim Summary

    • Nativists' approaches claim innate abstract Universal Grammar but encounter challenges in explaining how children map words onto grammatical categories using empirical data.

    Overall Summary

    • Nativist accounts introduce the idea of innate knowledge in language learning.
    • Continuity accounts posit innate grammatical knowledge present from the beginning.
    • Maturational accounts describe grammatical structures maturing gradually over time
    • Linking innate knowledge to input is addressed with semantic bootstrapping

    Critical Evaluation

    • The improved comprehension performance in children, when compared to production, warrants examination for evidence of innate abstract knowledge.
    • Differentiating between innate grammar maturation and gradual learning is vital.
    • Neuroscience aspects of representing innate grammar should be explored.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    Explore the nativist theories of language acquisition in early multi-word speech. This quiz delves into the principles of Universal Grammar and contrasts them with constructivist approaches. Assess your understanding of maturation accounts and the linking problem in language development.

    More Like This

    examen fudamentos
    20 questions

    examen fudamentos

    CushyNephrite avatar
    CushyNephrite
    Nativism Flashcards
    13 questions

    Nativism Flashcards

    LuminousGadolinium avatar
    LuminousGadolinium
    Nativism and Immigration in the Gilded Age
    5 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser