Podcast
Questions and Answers
দৈনন্দিন জীবনে 'উপনিবেশ' এর সাথে 'উত্তর' -এর মধ্যে কি সাম্য?
দৈনন্দিন জীবনে 'উপনিবেশ' এর সাথে 'উত্তর' -এর মধ্যে কি সাম্য?
লজিক কি?
লজিক কি?
'উপনিবেশ' -এর 'উত্তর' -এর 'নিজ' - 'ুরু' -র 'নির্দিষ্ট' - 'ী
'উপনিবেশ' -এর 'উত্তর' -এর 'নিজ' - 'ুরু' -র 'নির্দিষ্ট' - 'ী
'All men are mortal, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal' - এর 'All men are mortal, Socrates is a man' - এর 'All men are mortal, Socrates is mortal' - 'All men are mortal, Socrates is a man'!
'All men are mortal, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal' - এর 'All men are mortal, Socrates is a man' - এর 'All men are mortal, Socrates is mortal' - 'All men are mortal, Socrates is a man'!
Signup and view all the answers
'Deductive reasoning' - 'General' - 'Specific'
'Deductive reasoning' - 'General' - 'Specific'
Signup and view all the answers
'Logical reasoning' - 'Premises', 'Logical principles'
'Logical reasoning' - 'Premises', 'Logical principles'
Signup and view all the answers
ইন্ডাক্টিভ মান্যতা কী?
ইন্ডাক্টিভ মান্যতা কী?
Signup and view all the answers
যেভাবে 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' ফলাসির কারণের ভুল উপনিবেশ হয়:
যেভাবে 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' ফলাসির কারণের ভুল উপনিবেশ হয়:
Signup and view all the answers
'Slippery slope' (domino effect) ফলাসির বিষয়ে কোনটি সঠিক?
'Slippery slope' (domino effect) ফলাসির বিষয়ে কোনটি সঠিক?
Signup and view all the answers
'Ad hominem' (personal attack) fallacy-এর বিষয়ে, italic কোনগুলি italic में और गलत है?
'Ad hominem' (personal attack) fallacy-এর বিষয়ে, italic কোনগুলি italic में और गलत है?
Signup and view all the answers
'Inductive reasoning' bold সামান্য bold italic neutral italic character(s) bold?
'Inductive reasoning' bold সামান্য bold italic neutral italic character(s) bold?
Signup and view all the answers
'Logical fallacies' italic incorrect italic statement italic?
'Logical fallacies' italic incorrect italic statement italic?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Logic in Philosophy Class 12
As you delve deeper into the fascinating world of philosophy in Class 12, you'll often encounter the study of logic, a cornerstone of analytic thought. Logic is a discipline that examines the principles of reasoning, the analysis of arguments, and the critical evaluation of ideas. Understanding logic in the context of philosophy will aid you in developing critical thinking skills, enhancing your ability to analyze and evaluate arguments, and ultimately fortifying your overall philosophical understanding.
What is Logic?
Logic is the systematic study of the structure of arguments, their validity, and their soundness. It is not a set of rules to follow blindly but a way of thinking that helps us structure and evaluate our ideas. Logic explores the connections between premises and conclusions in an argument and seeks to determine whether the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.
Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is the process of drawing conclusions from premises by using logical principles. It consists of two main types: deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning.
-
Deductive reasoning is a process that leads from the general to the specific. It aims to derive a conclusion that is logically necessary given certain premises. If the premises are true, deductive arguments must lead to true conclusions. For example, the syllogism: "All men are mortal, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal" is a deductive argument.
-
Inductive reasoning is a process that leads from the specific to the general. It aims to derive a conclusion that is probable given certain premises. Inductive arguments are not necessarily true, but they are more likely to be true if the premises are true. For example, "All the swans I have seen are white, so it is probable that all swans are white."
Logical Fallacies
Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can lead to incorrect conclusions. Understanding logical fallacies is crucial to avoid them in your own arguments and to recognize them in the arguments of others. Some common logical fallacies include:
-
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of this): This fallacy occurs when we assume that because one event follows another, the first event must have caused the second. For example, "Every time the stock market goes up, the president gets re-elected, so the president must be responsible for the good economy."
-
Slippery slope (also known as the domino effect): This fallacy occurs when we assume that a single event will lead to a series of disastrous consequences. For example, "If we allow same-sex marriage, then polygamy, incest, and bestiality will follow."
-
Ad hominem (personal attack): This fallacy occurs when we attack the person presenting an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. For example, "You're an atheist, so you can't possibly know anything about religion."
Conclusion
Logic in philosophy class 12 is a fascinating subject that can help you develop critical thinking skills and sharpen your ability to analyze and evaluate arguments. By understanding the basics of logic and identifying common logical fallacies, you can make your arguments stronger and more persuasive. Logic is not just a set of rules to follow but a method of approaching problems and analyzing evidence in a systematic and rigorous manner. You'll find that understanding logic will help you in many areas of life, not just philosophy.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Enhance your critical thinking skills by exploring the study of logic in Class 12 philosophy. Learn about deductive and inductive reasoning, logical fallacies, and the systematic evaluation of arguments. Acquire a deeper understanding of how to structure and analyze ideas in a philosophical context.
