Legal Cases: Tionn Davis v. Karolek Arts
32 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What condition did Davis's doctor advise her to avoid when planning to start a family?

  • Pregnancy complications
  • Travel to zika-infested areas (correct)
  • Exposure to mosquitoes
  • Heavy lifting

    • What was the reason given for Berto not traveling to Panama?

  • Lack of experience
  • Fear of zika
  • Serious knee problems (correct)
  • Family commitments

    • What was the main argument for the Defendant's decision to deny Davis's travel accommodation?

  • Berto had a physical incapacity (correct)
  • Davis’s request was made too late
  • Davis was not qualified for installation
  • Davis had a prior work violation

    • What precautionary measures did Davis take before traveling to Panama?

    <p>Wore protective clothing and used repellent (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When did Davis inform the Defendant about her pregnancy plans?

    <p>Around Thanksgiving 2022 (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conclusion did the court reach regarding the treatment difference between Davis and Berto?

    <p>It was justified by non-discriminatory reasons (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What event was scheduled for June 26, 2023, in relation to the sculptural project?

    <p>Public unveiling (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Davis's reaction after returning from Panama regarding her health?

    <p>She tested positive for zika (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why was Davis considered uniquely qualified for the installation task?

    <p>She had previous experience in similar projects (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the Defendant think about the news related to zika?

    <p>It was exaggerated and not concerning (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary reason the plaintiff filed a complaint?

    <p>She was required to travel to a zika-infested area while trying to conceive. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did the plaintiff compare her situation to her male colleague's?

    <p>He received accommodation for health concerns she did not. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the role of Eduardo Berto in the case presented?

    <p>He is a witness with a knee injury. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legitimate business reason did the defendant give for assigning the plaintiff to travel?

    <p>The project required her specific skills. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did the defendant respond to the plaintiff's Complaint?

    <p>Admitted some aspects while denying others. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What health issue did Eduardo Berto express concern over when asked to travel?

    <p>A previously sustained knee infection. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Marion Kinney's expertise in relation to the Waterways project?

    <p>Material science. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which two individuals primarily collaborated on the Waterways project?

    <p>The plaintiff and Eduardo Berto. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What significant health event did Eduardo Berto undergo in January 2023?

    <p>He had knee surgery. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the plaintiff's doctor advise concerning travel plans?

    <p>To avoid zika-infested areas while trying to conceive. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which best describes the responsibilities of Ms. Davis on the Waterways project?

    <p>She supervised the overall project execution. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of project was Waterways described as?

    <p>A high-profile work of art. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the initial reaction of the defendant to the plaintiff's request for no travel?

    <p>She agreed that staying was best for him. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What significant change occurred in the plaintiff's personal life before filing the complaint?

    <p>She got married and wanted to start a family. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is a reason why Plaintiff's request for an accommodation was denied by Defendant?

    <p>The document does not include a reason why Plaintiff's request for an accommodation was denied by Defendant. (D), Defendant did not believe Plaintiff's reason for needing an accommodation to be legitimate. (E)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main reason that Plaintiff did not want to travel to Panama?

    <p>Plaintiff was afraid of contracting the Zika virus. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the legal basis for the Plaintiff's claim against the Defendant?

    <p>Both A and B. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the legal status of the Defendant in this case?

    <p>All of the above. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of these statements is true according to the document?

    <p>All of the above. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following are reasons for the Plaintiff's emotional distress?

    <p>All of the above. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary goal of Plaintiff's lawsuit?

    <p>To sue the Defendant for failing to grant the accommodation. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the most significant claim that Plaintiff makes in the complaint?

    <p>That the Defendant's actions constitute a violation of Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Case Summary: Tionn Davis v. Karolek Arts

    • Plaintiff: Tionn Davis, born June 16, 1985, residing in Metropolis, Illinois. Employed by Karolek Arts.
    • Defendant: Katrina Karolek, founder/President of Karolek Arts, Inc., based in Metropolis, Illinois.
    • Case Background: Disparate treatment claim under Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). Davis requested an accommodation to avoid travel to Panama due to Zika virus concerns during her pregnancy attempt. Her request was denied, while a male colleague (Berto) with knee issues received a similar accommodation.
    • Defendant's Defense: Karolek argued Davis’s role in supervising the "Waterways" sculpture installation in Panama was crucial, outweighing any accommodation request.
    • Similar Employee Argument: Davis argued Berto, granted an accommodation for knee issues, was similarly situated to her in terms of ability to work.
    • Court Ruling (Summary Judgment): The court sided with Karolek, stating that Berto's actual physical ailments (infection after knee replacement) provided a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the accommodation, unlike Davis's potential pregnancy-related risk, deemed "speculative."
    • Appeal Focus: The Seventh Circuit limited the appeal to whether: 1) Davis presented a prima facie case of discrimination, and 2) Defendant's reasons for disparate treatment were pretextual.

    Plaintiff's Claim:

    • Pregnancy Attempt: Davis and husband were trying to start a family, encouraged by a doctor.
    • Zika Virus Concern: Davis's doctor warned against travel to Zika-affected regions due to potential risks for pregnancy.
    • Accommodation Request: Davis requested a travel exemption in anticipation of pregnancy, referencing the Zika outbreak.
    • Accommodation Denial: Karolek denied the accommodation, arguing Davis was the best person to supervise the Panama installation.
    • Emotional Distress: Davis and husband experienced anxiety and emotional distress due to Zika risks and the possibility of not having biological children.
    • Pregnancy Risk Timeline: Davis may face health complications if she attempts pregnancy over the age of 40.

    Defendant's Defense:

    • Berto's Knee Issues: Berto suffered a knee infection after his replacement surgery and requested, and received, an accommodation to not travel for work.
    • Waterways Project: Crucial Role: Karolek deemed Davis essential for the Waterways project in Panama due to her project leadership and intimate understanding of the sculpture.
    • Project Importance: The Waterways project was a high-profile, large-scale commission.
    • Project Methodology: Karolek's studio uses a traditional methodology.
    • Davis's Construction Role: Davis's role involved intricate design and construction, particularly creating and assembling sections of the finished sculpture for later installation in Panama.
    • Davis's Qualifications: She was deemed the best person to oversee the Panama installation, particularly with unfamiliar site and worker conditions.

    Supporting Evidence:

    • Affidavit of Eduardo Berto: Berto's affidavit detailed his knee condition, explaining his request for accommodation and its acceptance by Karolek.
    • Affidavit of Marion Kinney: Kinney, the materials expert for the project, corroborated Davis's critical role in developing a new material and collaborating extensively with her.
    • Davis's Deposition: Davis’ testimony confirmed her role and concerns about travel.
    • Karolek's deposition: Karolek's deposition confirmed the details of the project, the reasons for the project assignments, and the travel accommodations for Berto.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the case summary of Tionn Davis v. Karolek Arts, focusing on the claims of disparate treatment under Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Analyze the denial of accommodation requests due to pregnancy-related concerns and the implications of the court's ruling on similar employee situations.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser