Podcast
Questions and Answers
A Strawman argument involves two imaginary persons.
A Strawman argument involves two imaginary persons.
False
In the example provided, if you do not go to bed early, you will inevitably become a decent escort lady.
In the example provided, if you do not go to bed early, you will inevitably become a decent escort lady.
False
The proponent is the person who presents the original statement and is considered the 'real man' in the argument.
The proponent is the person who presents the original statement and is considered the 'real man' in the argument.
False
Politician A's response in the debate about climate change is an example of a Strawman fallacy.
Politician A's response in the debate about climate change is an example of a Strawman fallacy.
Signup and view all the answers
A straw man argument involves distorting or misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.
A straw man argument involves distorting or misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.
Signup and view all the answers
The term 'ignoratio elenchi' refers to when the conclusion changes into a new complete subject matter.
The term 'ignoratio elenchi' refers to when the conclusion changes into a new complete subject matter.
Signup and view all the answers
Suppressed evidence refers to including all relevant data to strengthen an argument.
Suppressed evidence refers to including all relevant data to strengthen an argument.
Signup and view all the answers
Implementing policies to reduce carbon emissions was the main focus of the debate according to the text.
Implementing policies to reduce carbon emissions was the main focus of the debate according to the text.
Signup and view all the answers
Ambiguity in language can lead to fallacies of reasoning due to confusion in either the premise or conclusion.
Ambiguity in language can lead to fallacies of reasoning due to confusion in either the premise or conclusion.
Signup and view all the answers
The term 'Strawman' means presenting a strong argument in favor of an opponent's position.
The term 'Strawman' means presenting a strong argument in favor of an opponent's position.
Signup and view all the answers
An ambiguous word, phrase, or sentence in an argument always enhances clarity and understanding.
An ambiguous word, phrase, or sentence in an argument always enhances clarity and understanding.
Signup and view all the answers
Nescafe claims to contain more antioxidants than green tea, promoting itself as a healthier choice for wellness.
Nescafe claims to contain more antioxidants than green tea, promoting itself as a healthier choice for wellness.
Signup and view all the answers
Circular reasoning and begging the question are two different variants of the same fallacy.
Circular reasoning and begging the question are two different variants of the same fallacy.
Signup and view all the answers
Petitio Principii is a Latin term that translates into English as 'beginning of the argument'.
Petitio Principii is a Latin term that translates into English as 'beginning of the argument'.
Signup and view all the answers
A complex question is one that is straightforward and easy to understand.
A complex question is one that is straightforward and easy to understand.
Signup and view all the answers
Special pleading occurs when someone justifies an exemption without reasonable grounds.
Special pleading occurs when someone justifies an exemption without reasonable grounds.
Signup and view all the answers
Weak analogy is also known as strong analogy due to its persuasive nature.
Weak analogy is also known as strong analogy due to its persuasive nature.
Signup and view all the answers
In circular reasoning, the conclusion merely rephrases the premise without adding new information.
In circular reasoning, the conclusion merely rephrases the premise without adding new information.
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Fallacies of Reasoning
- A fallacy is a mistaken belief or argument based on incorrect reasoning.
- Fallacies can lead to incorrect conclusions and mislead people.
Slippery Slope
- One action can lead to a series of negative events or consequences without sufficient evidence.
- Example: Not going to bed early can lead to failing in a nursing examination and ending up as an escort lady.
Irrelevant Thesis (Ignoratio Elenchi)
- Introducing a new, unrelated topic to divert attention from the original issue.
- Example: In a debate on climate change, a politician changes the subject to supporting local businesses.
Strawman
- Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
- Example: Person A says children shouldn't run into busy streets, and Person B argues that it would be foolish to keep children indoors all day.
Suppressed Evidence
- Intentionally omitting relevant data to destroy an argument.
- Example: Nescafe advertisement claiming it has three times more antioxidants than green tea, but ignoring other relevant information.
Fallacies of Ambiguity
- Using ambiguous language to mislead or deceive.
- Examples: Petitio Principii, Complex Question, Special Pleading, and Weak Analogy.
Petitio Principii
- Begging the question or circular reasoning.
- Examples: Assuming a conclusion without proving it, or using a premise that needs proof.
Complex Question
- A question that is loaded with a hidden assumption or premise.
- Example: "Have you stopped visiting my wife?" assumes the person visited the wife in the first place.
Special Pleading
- Seeking exemption for oneself or others without reasonable justification.
- Example: Expecting police officers and their families to be exempt from traffic regulations.
Weak Analogy
- Making a false or questionable comparison between two things.
- Example: Comparing two things without sufficient evidence or logical reasoning.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your knowledge on identifying irrelevant thesis statements. Examine a series of events or consequences that are not supported by evidence in the given example. Choose the correct option to determine the presence of an ignoratio elenchi fallacy.
