Untitled
30 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In which of the following scenarios is it ethically justifiable for a healthcare provider to temporarily withhold complete information from a patient?

  • When the patient has a history of anxiety and the provider fears the information will cause a panic attack, even with support.
  • When the patient's family requests that the information be withheld until they can be present to support the patient, and the provider assesses this is in the patient's best interest. (correct)
  • When the information is complex and the provider needs more time to prepare a simplified explanation.
  • When the healthcare provider believes the patient is not emotionally equipped to handle the information, regardless of family preference.

A physician is preparing to inform a patient about a new cancer diagnosis. According to the SPIKES protocol, what is the MOST appropriate first step?

  • Ensure a private and comfortable setting for the conversation. (correct)
  • Invite the patient's family to join the conversation to provide support during the discussion.
  • Share the information about the diagnosis in a clear and empathetic way.
  • Assess the patient's existing knowledge about their condition and its potential severity.

During a consultation, a patient expresses a strong belief in alternative medicine and distrust of conventional treatments. How should a healthcare provider initially approach discussing evidence-based treatment options, according to the SPIKES protocol?

  • Present the scientific evidence supporting conventional treatments, while dismissing the patient's beliefs as unfounded.
  • Avoid discussing conventional treatments altogether and focus solely on alternative therapies the patient is interested in.
  • Acknowledge the patient's beliefs and ask about their understanding of the situation before introducing medical information. (correct)
  • Immediately try to persuade the patient to accept conventional treatments to ensure they receive the best possible care.

A doctor is using the SPIKES protocol to inform a patient about a serious diagnosis. After setting up the interview and assessing the patient's perception, which action aligns BEST with eliciting an invitation from the patient?

<p>Asking the patient how they would like the information to be delivered. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

During bad news delivery, a patient becomes emotional and starts crying. Which of the following responses BEST demonstrates empathy, as emphasized in the SPIKES protocol?

<p>&quot;I can only imagine how upsetting this must be. Take your time.&quot; (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Withholding information about potential medication side effects from a patient is considered:

<p>A violation of informed consent and ethical practice. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Decision-making capacity is best described as the ability to:

<p>Understand information, reason with it, and make a voluntary choice. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A core component of decision-making capacity involves:

<p>The ability to make an informed choice. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which element is NOT a component of decision-making capacity?

<p>Forced choice (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary reason for ensuring patients receive complete information before obtaining informed consent?

<p>To fulfill the physician's legal duty and respect the patient's autonomy in making healthcare decisions. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of patient care, what does 'reasoned' imply within the definition of decision-making capacity?

<p>A choice based on logical evaluation of information. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a clinical trial, a researcher intentionally omits details about potential side effects to improve participant enrollment. What principle is being violated?

<p>Informed consent (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A doctor explains most of the treatment process but intentionally leaves out some of the possible negative outcomes. What could this lead to?

<p>A violation of the patient's right to make an informed decision about their healthcare. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the most likely consequence of a physician withholding crucial information when obtaining informed consent?

<p>The patient may be unable to make an autonomous and informed decision about their treatment. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A medical institution is conducting a study on a new surgical technique but fails to fully disclose the potential risks to the participants. Which of the following principles is most directly compromised?

<p>The ethical standard of informed consent (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the most important requirement for a medical expert witness when presenting their evidence?

<p>Possession of specialized knowledge relevant to the case, presented in a well-prepared report. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why should a medical expert witness generally not be involved in the direct care of the patient in question?

<p>Involvement may create conflicts of interest or bias their opinion. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A medical expert witness is preparing their evidence report. Which action would most improve the report's quality and credibility?

<p>Thoroughly revising and refining the report to ensure accuracy and clarity. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Consider a case where a medical expert's report is deemed inadmissible in court. What is the most likely reason for this decision?

<p>The report lacked clear connections between the expert's opinions and the specifics of the case. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what way does a 'medical expert evidence report' enhance the legal proceedings?

<p>It offers a structured and objective overview of complex medical issues, aiding informed decision-making. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A patient needs a kidney transplant, but a suitable living donor cannot be found. Which of the following ethical frameworks would best support the decision to prioritize this patient on the deceased donor waiting list, assuming all other factors are equal?

<p>Utilitarianism, maximizing overall well-being by offering the transplant to the patient most likely to benefit. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a scenario where a patient requires a liver transplant but is also actively abusing alcohol, which ethical principle is most challenged when deciding whether to proceed with the transplant?

<p>Beneficence, acting in the patient's best interest. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is not a medico-legal consideration in organ transplantation?

<p>Maintaining the anonymity of the recipient from the donor. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A hospital is developing a new protocol for organ allocation. Which approach would best balance the competing ethical considerations of utility and equity?

<p>Use a point system that considers both medical urgency and expected survival benefit. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A living donor experiences unforeseen complications after donating a kidney. Which principle of medical ethics dictates that the transplant team must provide ongoing care and support to the donor, even if it strains hospital resources?

<p>Non-maleficence (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the Medical Board of Australia's code of conduct, what is the primary responsibility of a doctor in relation to ensuring good medical practice?

<p>Placing the well-being of patients as their paramount concern. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which action aligns best with the principles outlined in the Good Medical Practice guidelines regarding patient autonomy?

<p>Providing patients with all necessary information, including potential risks and benefits, to enable informed decisions. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of maintaining professional boundaries, which scenario would be considered a violation of the Good Medical Practice guidelines?

<p>Engaging in a close personal relationship with a patient. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A doctor delegates a task to a junior colleague. According to the code of conduct, what is the doctor's ongoing responsibility?

<p>Ensuring the junior colleague has the necessary skills and providing appropriate supervision. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the Good Medical Practice code of conduct advise doctors to manage potential conflicts of interest?

<p>Disclosing the conflict of interest to relevant parties and recusing themselves if necessary. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Organ Transplantation

Surgical replacement of a failing or damaged organ with a healthy one.

Graft

Similar to a transplant; involves grafting tissue.

Patient Trust

The belief that healthcare providers are honest and truthful in their communications with patients.

SPIKES Protocol

A protocol for delivering difficult or negative information to patients in a sensitive and structured manner.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Information Withholding

Recognizing when complete information might not be disclosed to patients.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Patient Expectations

Patients generally expect honest communication from their healthcare providers.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Empathy in Communication

Acknowledging the patient's perspective and feelings before sharing bad news.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Withholding Information

Keeping back key details from a patient.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Physician's Legal Obligation

The legal responsibility of a doctor to properly inform a patient before a procedure or treatment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Informed Consent

Consent given freely after a patient understands all relevant information.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Effect of Withholding Info

Compromises patient autonomy and trust in the medical profession.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Importance of Valid Consent

Ensuring the patient is fully aware and agrees to treatment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Transparency in healthcare

Openly sharing all relevant information, including potential negative aspects.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Decision-making capacity

An individual's ability to make an informed, reasoned, and voluntary decision.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Information hiding

The act of intentionally withholding information from a patient.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Disclosing side effects

Ensuring a patient understands potential adverse effects of a treatment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasoned choice

Reasoning and understanding, allowing one to make a choice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Medical Expert Witness

An expert with specialized knowledge offering opinions in legal cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-Involvement in Patient Care

The state of not being involved in the patient's direct medical care.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Special Knowledge and Experience

Specific understanding and practical experience in a relevant medical area.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Opinions and Conclusions

Formally expressing well-supported conclusions relevant to the case.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Medical Expert Evidence Report

A comprehensive document presenting the expert's analysis and conclusions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is AHPRA?

Australia's regulatory body for health practitioners.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Role of the Medical Board of Australia?

Sets ethical and professional standards for doctors in Australia.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is 'Good Medical Practice'?

A guide outlining expected professional behavior for doctors.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Significance of 'Section 8.8'?

Section 8.8 provides specific guidance within the broader code.

Signup and view all the flashcards

AHPRA Code's Scope?

AHPRA's code is published in Canberra and applies nationally.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Ethics of truth telling in medical practice

  • Veracity, or truth telling, is a basic moral principle believed by patients to be standard practice by their healthcare providers regarding diagnoses, test results, and treatment options.
  • Attitudes toward truth telling have changed but remain controversial, specifically on whether it is ethically permissible to hide information or deceive a patient.

Importance of truth telling

  • Truth telling respects patient autonomy, allowing them to make informed decisions.
  • Patients with terminal illnesses need to know their condition to prepare for death, manage finances, and spend time with loved ones.
  • Truth telling maintains a trusting doctor-patient relationship.
  • Truth telling avoids malpractice and medico-legal claims, which can be caused by withholding information that hinders valid informed consent.
  • Physicians have a legal obligation to obtain valid informed consent by providing important information to patients.

Situations where truth telling may not be routinely applied

  • Patient wishes: If a patient has expressed a desire not to know the truth if it is bad, and would be too upsetting.
  • A physician should ask the patient to assign a responsible guardian.
  • Patient's condition: When revealing information would cause significantly more harm than benefit, such as severe depression or suicide risk.
  • Physicians should deliver the truth gradually while providing support.
  • Decision-making capacity: When the patient is unable to consent to treatment due to being incompetent or incapacitated and emergency treatment is required.
  • Physicians should inform the patient's relatives and obtain their consent if available.

SPIKES protocol for breaking bad news

  • Has four objectives: gathering information, giving complete medical information, providing support, and encouraging patient collaboration in developing a future strategy for treatment.

Components of "SPIKES" protocol

  • Setting: Arrange for privacy and involve important persons.
  • Perception: Determine what the patient knows about their condition and accept denial without confrontation.
  • Invitation: Ask if the patient wants to know the details of their condition and/or treatment, respecting their right not to know, but offer to answer questions later.
  • Knowledge: Give medical facts using understandable language, considering educational level, socio-cultural background, and emotional state, gradually providing information. Check patient understanding and respond to reactions, starting with positive facts. Give accurate facts about treatment options, prognosis, costs, etc.
  • Explore emotions: Allow the patient time to express feelings and then respond empathically.
  • Strategy and summary: Ask if they want to clarify anything and offer an agenda for the next meeting.

Ethical issues in mental illness

  • Mental illness is characterized by abnormal thoughts, emotions, behavior, and relationships.
  • Patients in neuropsychiatric practice may suffer from significant mental and physical symptoms, leading to an imbalance in the physician-patient relationship.
  • Physicians have a special ethical obligation to place the unique needs of mentally ill patients above their own interests.
  • Vulnerable groups: Mentally ill people are considered among this, and may suffer from ethical problems such as invalid informed consent, breaking confidentiality, and conflict of interest.
  • Physicians must be cautious of situations that may cause physical, sexual, psychological, or financial harm to patients.

Important ethical and professional practices in neuropsychiatric care:

  • Informed Consent: Is an ethically and legally important process.
  • Important points include:
    • Assessing decision-making capacity according to clinical and legal standards.
    • Providing all necessary information for accurate decision-making.
    • Protecting the patient from internal or external pressures.
    • Modifying the method of giving information if it is damaging to the patient, but should follow protocols.
    • It is unacceptable to hide information about side effects of medication.
  • Assessing decision-making capacity: Is the ability to reach an informed, reasoned, and free choice.
  • Must Understand relevant information. Must Interpret information wisely. Must Appreciate the situation and its consequences. Must Make a constant choice with reasoning
  • Required if patients Exhibit cognitive impairment, impaired judgment, or Manifest irrational behaviors and decisions.
  • Involuntary neuropsychiatric treatment: Obligatory treatment against patients' wishes, often hospitalization, indicated by imminent dangerousness to themselves or others, or inability to meet basic needs.
  • Involuntary treatment should be decided according to legal rules, must show dangerousness criteria, including:
    • Suffering from a severe mental disorder.
    • Likely to cause harm to self or substantial deterioration, or likely to cause harm to others.
    • Refusal or inability to consent to voluntary admission.
    • Lacking the capacity to make an informed decision.
  • Confidentiality: Is an ethical and legal right, especially important for the mentally ill due to the personal nature of information shared.
  • Important confidentiality considerations:
    • Patients should be informed about the limits of confidentiality at the start of the relationship.
    • Disclosure of confidential information should only occur with informed consent or to protect from imminent harm.
    • Disclosure should be limited to the minimum required.
    • Psychotherapy notes should be separate from the medical record.
    • Electronic patient records require additional protection.
  • Honesty and Trust: Neurologists and psychiatrists should maintain a trusting relationship and avoid any act of fraud or exploitation.
  • Specific examples of fraud in neuropsychiatric practice:
    • Making false or misleading statements.
    • Recommending unnecessary treatment or admission.
    • Fabricating records or false bills.
    • Supporting false sick leaves.
    • Falsifying qualifications.
    • Practicing outside one's area of competence.

Ethical aspects of organ transplantation

  • Organ transplantation is the surgical replacement of a failing or damaged organ with a healthy one.

Types of transplantation

  • Auto transplantation: transplanting organs and/or tissues within the same person's body.
  • Has no legal or ethical limitations.
  • Allotransplantation: transplanting organs and/or tissues between two different people.
  • Depends on the degree of similarity between tissue antigens of the donor and recipient.
  • Rejection remains a main cause of failure.
  • Transfusion: the most common form of transplantation.
  • Voluntary informed consent from the patient.
  • No risk to the health of the donor.
  • Donor must be free from transmissible diseases.
  • Donor information should be kept confidential.
  • Payment to the donor is ethically unacceptable.

Living organ donation

  • Living people who wish to donate can donate one of a set of paired organs (kidney), or a portion of an organ (liver).
  • Living donors may be:
    • Living Related Donors (LRDs): blood relatives of the recipient.
    • Living Non-Related Donors (LNRDs): not related by blood, can include a husband, wife, or a friend.
    • Living Non-directed donors (LNDDs): unknown to the recipient, donation out of humanitarian motives.

Rules before living organ donation

  • Voluntary informed consent from a competent donor.
  • There should be no harm to the donor.
  • The operation should be in a well-equipped hospital.
  • Organ donation from children and mentally disabled persons violates their body integrity due to lack of giving consent.

Living donor complications

  • Health problems: postoperative and future health complications are possible.
  • Psychological problems: family members may feel pressured to donate if there is a sick relative.
  • Medical follow up: Donors may face future complications without adequate care.
  • Cadaveric organ donation: Donation from a dead person, needing support from medical, legal, and the public.
  • Brain death of the person should be declared before donation.
  • Wishes of the dead person should be respected.
  • Consent of the family should be obtained.

Brain death

  • Irreversible loss of brain function, including the brain stem frequently from traumatic brain injury in adults.

Brain death diagnosis criteria

  • Deep uninterrupted coma with no response to stimuli.
  • At least six hours post coma onset.
  • Coma cause confirmed by diagnostic measures (extensive damage to the brain).
  • Complete absence of brain stem reflexes (pupillary, corneal, gag, cough reflexes).
  • No spontaneous respiration.

Rules before cadaveric organ donation

  • Transplant team should be different from the team providing care for the potential donor to avoid potential conflict of interest.
  • Organs removed and the donor's death has been declared by a competent medical team.
  • No payment for organs - buying and selling is unethical. Doctors involved in paid donation - medical malpractice.
  • Once a person dies; his or her organs may be donated if the person has consented to do so before death. With an unknown status, the hospital may request from a family member to give consent to remove for organs.
  • Physicians caring for a patient should not be involved for donation after patient's death, including obtaining consent, as it is against the law. Defer to the hospital.
  • Physicians provide these reports about their patients for different purposes.
  • A medico-legal report is usually read by non-medical personnel (prosecutor, judge).
  • The report may be used in court proceedings and subjected to scrutiny (review, analysis).
  • A structured, comprehensive report may minimize the chances of giving testimony in court and avoid shifting a physician's status from witness to accused.
  • Treating doctor has a professional and ethical obligation to assist by providing an expert report.

Patients, Lawyers, Insurance companies, Employers, Legal authorities (prosecution, court). Physicians will be asked to present a report about their patients' conditions/management lines if there is accusation (in two versions; English and Arabic).

  • Take patient permission unless the court asks for it.
  • Understand the intention and objective of the report.
  • Utilize medical records to write reports and provide clarity on request from court.
  • Write factually accurate information in the report.
  • Don't write report as a paragraph/story but as a bullet point list.
  • Report sections:
    • Name of requesting party, date of request and purpose of report.
    • Patient information (name, age).
    • Date of admission/interview.
    • Credentials, Address and Qualifications.
    • Medical Facts in Chronological Order.
    • Clinical presentation (history and symptoms)
    • Examination findings.
    • Investigations.
    • Provisional diagnosis.
    • Treatment/management.
    • Patient Informed Consent
    • Current Patient Condition.
    • Response to Questions.
    • Signature and Date of Report.
    • References.
  • Honest and Accurate Obligation:
    • Honesty and be transparent, use truth and facts, be 100% certain before signature.
    • Check all important information Before Signature.
    • Justifiable Time Frame.
    • No Expectations should be written.
    • Do not accuse colleague.

Tips

  • Always say facts truthfully under oath.
  • Always Use Medical Records.
  • Add a second report if there's a mistake.
  • Use clear concise abbreviations, terms and concepts.
  • Don't use legal language.
  • Facts and opinions should have clear borders.
  • Dont opinions beyond knowledge.
  • Don't avoid information.
  • Don't avoid information Avoid Emotionally Loaded Language.
  • Consult a Medical Defense Organisation.

Role of medical expert witness:

  • Court can request the treating and/or expert witness to provide opinions of the case/management.
  • Must define the Standard of Care in medical care claims.
  • No involvement with patient in case but should have skills/expertise.
  • Well Prepared Expert Report with revised details.
  • Must competent for an effective action.
  • Inexperience witnesses are misleading.
  • Expert Signature with Delivery and Responsibility from statements by Witness.

Medical expert report must include:

  • Experts Qualifications.
  • All Important Facts.
  • Reason for Expressed Opinions.
  • Indicating Outside area of Expertise on areas outside the question.
  • Include Reference Support with Examinations/Qualifications/Tests.
  • State Lack if Information.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Ethics in Medical Practice PDF

More Like This

Untitled Quiz
6 questions

Untitled Quiz

AdoredHealing avatar
AdoredHealing
Untitled
44 questions

Untitled

ExaltingAndradite avatar
ExaltingAndradite
Untitled
6 questions

Untitled

StrikingParadise avatar
StrikingParadise
Untitled Quiz
50 questions

Untitled Quiz

JoyousSulfur avatar
JoyousSulfur
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser