Podcast
Questions and Answers
Why can't the price be recovered for the alleged excess quantities supplied by the Claimant?
Why can't the price be recovered for the alleged excess quantities supplied by the Claimant?
- Because the CBI enquiry did not find any conclusive evidence of the Claimant's involvement in increasing the quantity
- Because the alleged excess quantities were consumed by the Purchaser (correct)
- Because the Respondents never cancelled the supply orders
- Because the amount paid against supply order no 14 was recovered
Why does the text mention the analogy of 'eating a cake and having it too'?
Why does the text mention the analogy of 'eating a cake and having it too'?
- To illustrate the Department of Supply's position
- To emphasize the Respondents' consumption of the material (correct)
- To highlight the Claimant's entitlement to relief
- To explain the CBI enquiry's conclusion
Which of the following grounds is NOT mentioned as a reason for the Claimant's entitlement to relief?
Which of the following grounds is NOT mentioned as a reason for the Claimant's entitlement to relief?
- The amount paid against supply order no 14 was recovered (correct)
- The Respondents never cancelled the supply orders
- The CBI enquiry did not find any conclusive evidence of the Claimant's involvement in increasing the quantity
- The alleged excess quantities supplied by the Claimant were consumed by the Purchaser
What is the basis for the Claimant's entitlement to relief according to the text?
What is the basis for the Claimant's entitlement to relief according to the text?
What is the purpose of mentioning the Department of Supply in the text?
What is the purpose of mentioning the Department of Supply in the text?