Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
- In R v Guraj, applying the principles in Soneji, the court held that the relevant decision should not be set aside because, whilst a serious procedural breach had been committed, it had been remedied and the defendant had not suffered any unfairness as a result.
- If a public body breaches a mandatory procedural statutory rule, then this will invalidate the relevant decision. (correct)
- In the case of JN (Cameroon) the failure to follow the statutory obligation was effectively considered technical in nature and so not sufficient to conclude that Parliament could have intended this breach to justify invalidating the decision.
- The historic approach of the courts concerned the distinction between mandatory statutory rules and those rules which were found to be directory in nature.
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Which one of the following statements is correct?
- In Lloyd v McMahon, Lord Bridge set down mandatory factors that the courts must consider in assessing the level of fairness owed by a decision-maker.
- An applicant must show that the public body who made the decision owed them a high level of fairness in order for the court to go on to assess the content of the fairness and whether there was a breach.
- A duty to act fairly will almost always apply to administrative and judicial decision-making - the crucial question is the level of the duty that should apply, which will depend upon the context of the decision and the legal issues involved. (correct)
- The common law duty to act fairly applies only to judicial decision-making and not to administrative decision-making.
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
- In McInnes v Onslow-Fane, when considering the level of fairness owed in a licensing case, the court made a distinction between application cases and forfeiture cases, and also discussed a third category of legitimate expectation cases.
- In Ridge v Baldwin the House of Lords clarified that the duty to act fairly applied to both judicial and administrative decision-making.
- In JN (Cameroon) the approach followed by the court with respect to a failure to comply with the Immigration (Notices) Regulations 2003 was to assess the consequences of the failure and then ask what Parliament could have intended in light of those consequences.
- In Soneji, the court endorsed the approach in Aylesbury Mushrooms, with respect to the assessment of procedural statutory rules. (correct)
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?
Which one of the following statements is incorrect?