🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

Free Will and Determinism Concepts
5 Questions
1 Views

Free Will and Determinism Concepts

Created by
@UserReplaceableMaroon7920

Podcast Beta

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What does the principle PUC assert?

  • Human actions are always determined.
  • Some events occur without a cause.
  • Free will is an illusion.
  • Every event has a cause. (correct)
  • Which conclusion is derived from the incompatibility argument regarding PUC and FWT?

  • Nobody ever acts freely. (correct)
  • Some events are not caused.
  • Everyone acts freely.
  • Every event is determined by external factors.
  • If one accepts the principle of FWT, what must also be accepted according to the argument presented?

  • All events can be traced back to a cause.
  • Events occur randomly without influence.
  • Human choices are mere illusions.
  • Some actions are not determined. (correct)
  • In the context of the arguments presented, what is the implication if someone claims that not everything is determined?

    <p>Some events must not be caused.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the abbreviation FWT stand for in this context?

    <p>Free Will Thesis</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Free Will and Determinism

    • The text explores the relationship between free will and determinism, examining whether these two concepts are compatible.

    • Principle of Universal Causation (PUC): Every event has a cause.

    • Free Will Thesis (FWT): Sometimes people act freely.

    • Incompatibility: Two principles are incompatible if a valid argument exists from one principle and necessary truths to the denial of the other.

    • Argument for Incompatibility (1):

      • If every event has a cause (PUC), then every action is determined by previous conditions.
      • If actions are determined by previous conditions, then no one acts freely.
      • Therefore, no one ever acts freely (denial of FWT).
    • Argument for Incompatibility (2):

      • If sometimes people act freely (FWT), then not all actions are determined by previous conditions.
      • If not all actions are determined by previous conditions, then some events are not caused.
      • Therefore, some events are not caused (denial of PUC).
    • The arguments presented show a logical incompatibility between the Principle of Universal Causation and the Free Will Thesis.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Free Will & Determinism I.pdf

    Description

    This quiz delves into the complex relationship between free will and determinism, exploring key arguments and principles such as the Principle of Universal Causation and the Free Will Thesis. It examines the compatibility of these concepts and discusses various arguments for their incompatibility. Test your understanding of these philosophical ideas and their implications.

    More Quizzes Like This

    Ethics: Determinism and Free Will
    16 questions
    Free Will and Determinism
    12 questions
    Philosophy: Free Will vs Determinism
    6 questions

    Philosophy: Free Will vs Determinism

    UserReplaceableMaroon7920 avatar
    UserReplaceableMaroon7920
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser