quiz image

Florida Law: Loitering and Prowling

jkhender avatar
jkhender
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

16 Questions

Under F.S.§856.021, what is a circumstance that may warrant a justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property?

The person takes flight upon appearance of a law enforcement officer.

What must a law enforcement officer do before arresting a person for loitering or prowling?

Afford the person an opportunity to dispel any alarm or immediate concern.

What is the consequence of a law enforcement officer failing to comply with the procedure before arresting a person for loitering or prowling?

The person cannot be convicted of an offense under this section.

What is the degree of misdemeanor for violating F.S.§856.021?

Second degree

Under what circumstances can a law enforcement officer make a warrantless arrest for loitering or prowling?

If a delay in procuring a warrant would probably enable the person to escape arrest.

What is a factor that may dispel any alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property?

The person's explanation for their presence and conduct.

Has F.S.§856.021 been held to be constitutional?

Yes, it has been held to be constitutional.

What must a law enforcement officer give to the person before affording them the opportunity to dispel any alarm or immediate concern?

The person's rights under the Fifth Amendment.

According to the court decision in Carroll v. State, how should §856.021 be applied?

With special care

What is required for an arrest to be legal under §856.021?

All elements of the misdemeanor offense must occur in the presence of the arresting officer

What was the outcome in the case of Carter v. State?

The arrest was ruled unconstitutional due to lack of probable cause

What was the decision in the case of M.R. v. State?

The adjudication of delinquency was proper

What was the outcome in the case of Barna v. State?

The evidence was suppressed due to unlawful stop

What was the reasoning behind the officer's suspicion in the case of Battle v. State?

The defendant was seen lurking in the dark near residences

What was the outcome of the Hiibel v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of Nevada case?

The Nevada law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court

What is required of an officer to articulate specific facts showing imminent breach of the peace or threat to public safety?

The officer must be able to articulate specific facts

Study Notes

Loitering and Prowling under F.S.§856.021

  • It is unlawful for any person to loiter or prowl in a place, at a time, or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals, under circumstances that warrant justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property in the vicinity.

Circumstances Warranting Alarm or Immediate Concern

  • The person takes flight upon appearance of a law enforcement officer.
  • Refuses to identify himself.
  • Manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or any object.

Officer's Procedure Before Arrest

  • Unless flight or other circumstances make it impracticable, a law enforcement officer must afford the person an opportunity to dispel any alarm or immediate concern before making an arrest.
  • The officer must request that the person identify himself and explain his presence and conduct.

Fifth Amendment Rights

  • A law enforcement officer must give the person his or her Fifth Amendment rights before affording the person the opportunity to dispel any alarm.

Conviction Requirements

  • No person shall be convicted of an offense under this section if the law enforcement officer did not comply with the procedure or if it appears at trial that the explanation given by the person is true and, if believed by the officer at the time, would have dispelled the alarm or immediate concern.

Constitutionality of F.S.§856.021

  • The statute has been held to be constitutional (Watts v. State, 463 So.2d 205 (Fla. 1985)).
  • However, it must be applied with special care (Carroll v. State, 573 So.2d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)).
  • All elements of the misdemeanor offense of loitering and prowling must occur in the presence of the arresting officer for the arrest to constitute a legal arrest.

Case Law Examples

  • Riding a bicycle in the early afternoon on a public road while carrying a bag does not constitute loitering and prowling (Carter v. State, 516 So.2d 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)).
  • Standing in a commercial shopping center at 11:30 p.m. and pulling on business's rear door handles to see if door would open constitutes loitering and prowling (M.R. v. State, 101 So. 3d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)).
  • Standing, smoking, and talking to another man in the rear corner of a bar parking lot at 11:30 p.m. is insufficient reasonable cause for a stop (Barna v. State, 636 So.2d 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)).
  • Lurking in the dark by residences in the wee hours of the morning is unusual for law-abiding persons and constitutes loitering and prowling (Battle v. State, 868 So.2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)).

This quiz covers the laws and regulations surrounding loitering and prowling in Florida, including the circumstances that warrant alarm or concern for safety. Legal Guideline #5

Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards

Convert your notes into interactive study material.

Get started for free

More Quizzes Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser