Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the primary ethical concern in the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
What is the primary ethical concern in the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
- The study was not replicated enough times to ensure reliable results.
- The potential benefits of the study do not outweigh the harm caused to the dogs. (correct)
- The experiment was not conducted in a controlled environment.
- The researchers did not obtain informed consent from the dogs' owners.
What is a potential long-term effect of the Learned Helplessness Experiment on the dogs?
What is a potential long-term effect of the Learned Helplessness Experiment on the dogs?
- Enhanced social skills
- Improved problem-solving abilities
- Increased confidence in learning new tasks
- Long-term psychological harm and damage (correct)
Why is the generalizability of the Learned Helplessness Experiment's results to human psychology questionable?
Why is the generalizability of the Learned Helplessness Experiment's results to human psychology questionable?
- The study's results may not translate to human subjects due to species differences. (correct)
- The study only used a small sample size of dogs.
- The experiment did not control for extraneous variables.
- The researchers did not use the correct statistical analysis.
What is a potential risk of conducting research like the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
What is a potential risk of conducting research like the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
What is a necessary measure to address the ethical concerns raised by the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
What is a necessary measure to address the ethical concerns raised by the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
What is a potential alternative to the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
What is a potential alternative to the Learned Helplessness Experiment?
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
Study Notes
Ethical Concerns in the Learned Helplessness Experiment
- The experiment raises numerous ethical concerns due to the deliberate infliction of pain and distress on animals, violating animal welfare principles.
- The dogs were subjected to electric shocks and intentionally induced psychological harm, potentially causing long-term damage, without their ability to provide informed consent.
- The experiment exploits the vulnerability of animals and the power imbalance between researchers and subjects.
- The justification for causing harm is questionable, especially considering that alternative, less harmful methods might have been available to study learned helplessness.
- The study does not address the long-term impacts on the dogs' well-being, and the generalizability of results from animal studies to human psychology is debatable.
- The experiment risks desensitizing both researchers and society to animal suffering in the pursuit of scientific knowledge.
- The need for stringent ethical guidelines in animal research is critical to ensure that potential benefits are carefully weighed against the harm caused to subjects.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
