Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to utilitarianism, what is the ultimate criterion for judging the morality of an action?
According to utilitarianism, what is the ultimate criterion for judging the morality of an action?
- Adherence to a predefined set of moral rules or duties.
- The extent to which it maximizes happiness and minimizes unhappiness, considering everyone affected equally. (correct)
- The intention behind the action, regardless of the outcome
- Whether the action is approved by a majority of individuals in a moral democracy.
Which of the following scenarios would a utilitarian most likely support?
Which of the following scenarios would a utilitarian most likely support?
- A government policy that slightly reduces the happiness of the majority to significantly improve the well-being of a marginalized group. (correct)
- Strict adherence to a rule against lying, even if lying could prevent a greater harm.
- Forced organ donation from a healthy individual to save five patients in critical condition.
- Protecting individual rights at all costs, regardless of the consequences for overall happiness.
What is a key difference between utilitarianism and deontology?
What is a key difference between utilitarianism and deontology?
- Utilitarianism focuses on the intentions behind actions, while deontology focuses on the consequences.
- Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, focusing on outcomes, while deontology focuses on adherence to moral rules or duties. (correct)
- Utilitarianism is more concerned with individual rights, while deontology focuses on the overall welfare of society.
- Utilitarianism asserts that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences, while deontology prioritizes the greatest happiness for the greatest number.
What does the 'experience machine' thought experiment, proposed by Nozick, suggest about utilitarianism?
What does the 'experience machine' thought experiment, proposed by Nozick, suggest about utilitarianism?
Which ethical theory is most likely to struggle with the justification of actions that violate individual rights, even if those actions lead to a greater overall happiness?
Which ethical theory is most likely to struggle with the justification of actions that violate individual rights, even if those actions lead to a greater overall happiness?
According to Kant's categorical imperative, which principle is most crucial in determining the morality of an action?
According to Kant's categorical imperative, which principle is most crucial in determining the morality of an action?
In virtue ethics, how are virtues typically defined in relation to vices?
In virtue ethics, how are virtues typically defined in relation to vices?
What is a primary criticism of virtue ethics concerning its practical application?
What is a primary criticism of virtue ethics concerning its practical application?
How does Kant's categorical imperative address the treatment of individuals?
How does Kant's categorical imperative address the treatment of individuals?
Which scenario poses a challenge to deontological ethics?
Which scenario poses a challenge to deontological ethics?
Flashcards
Ethical Theories
Ethical Theories
Theories that attempt to define what makes behavior morally right or wrong.
Consequentialism
Consequentialism
A type of ethical theory stating that the consequences of an action determine its moral status.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
A sub-division of consequentialism, promote actions that maximize happiness and minimize unhappiness.
Utilitarianism Principles
Utilitarianism Principles
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deontology
Deontology
Signup and view all the flashcards
Categorical Imperative
Categorical Imperative
Signup and view all the flashcards
Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics
Signup and view all the flashcards
Virtue
Virtue
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conflicting Rules in Deontology
Conflicting Rules in Deontology
Signup and view all the flashcards