Education Law: Board of Education v. Rowley (1982) Case
10 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the main argument of the student's parents in the Board of Education v.Rowley (1982) case?

  • The school was not providing equal access to education (correct)
  • The school was not providing a maximally beneficial education
  • The school was not providing a free and appropriate public education
  • The school was not providing a sign-language interpreter for their deaf child
  • What is the main goal of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)?

  • To guarantee a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to children with disabilities (correct)
  • To provide educational benefit to children with disabilities
  • To provide sign-language interpreters for deaf students
  • To provide a maximally beneficial education to children with disabilities
  • What was the outcome of the Board of Education v.Rowley (1982) case?

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district (correct)
  • The case was dismissed due to lack of evidence
  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the student's parents
  • The court ordered the school to provide a sign-language interpreter
  • What was the main issue in the Endrew F.v.Douglas County School District (2017) case?

    <p>The level of educational benefit required for a free and appropriate public education</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the ruling of the 10th circuit court in the Endrew F.v.Douglas County School District (2017) case?

    <p>The school district only had to provide something more than de minimis</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the Supreme Court's decision in the Endrew F.v.Douglas County School District (2017) case?

    <p>Educational programs must be appropriately ambitious in light of each child's circumstances</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main difference between the Board of Education v.Rowley (1982) and Endrew F.v.Douglas County School District (2017) cases?

    <p>The latter case sought to clarify the level of educational benefit required for a FAPE</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of the Endrew F.v.Douglas County School District (2017) case?

    <p>It clarified the level of educational benefit required for a free and appropriate public education</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the relationship between the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)?

    <p>The EHA was replaced by the IDEA</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary goal of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)?

    <p>To guarantee a free and appropriate public education to children with disabilities</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Board of Education v. Rowley (1982)

    • The Supreme Court ruled that a New York public school provided a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to a deaf student, despite not providing a sign-language interpreter.
    • The school's decision was based on the student's academic performance and progress, which demonstrated that she did not need an interpreter.
    • The Court determined that the school was not responsible for providing a maximally beneficial education, but rather a FAPE that could be achieved even if the instruction provided only some educational benefit.

    Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017)

    • The Supreme Court case sought to clarify the level of educational benefit required to provide a FAPE to children with disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
    • The Court rejected the 10th circuit's ruling that schools only had to provide a trivial benefit to the child.
    • Instead, the Court ruled that educational programs must be appropriately ambitious in light of each child's circumstances and must have challenging objectives.

    Proposition 227 (California, 1998)

    • A ballot measure outlawed bilingual education in California, making it illegal for teachers to speak Spanish in California public schools.
    • This measure was backed by Ron Unz.

    Reversal of Proposition 227 (2016)

    • California voters were poised to reverse the ban on bilingual education nearly 20 years after its implementation.
    • A statewide ballot question aimed to end the restrictions of Proposition 227 and bring an end to California's official era of English-only instruction.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Quiz about the landmark case Board of Education v. Rowley, which dealt with a deaf student's right to a sign-language interpreter in a New York public school. The case explored the definition of a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) for children with disabilities.

    More Like This

    Special Education Laws and Acts
    11 questions
    IDEA and UDL in Physical Education
    40 questions
    Special Education Law Quiz
    25 questions

    Special Education Law Quiz

    FestiveLucchesiite1116 avatar
    FestiveLucchesiite1116
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser