Podcast
Questions and Answers
In a defamation case involving a public figure, what additional element must the plaintiff prove, beyond the standard requirements of a false statement, understanding, and publication?
In a defamation case involving a public figure, what additional element must the plaintiff prove, beyond the standard requirements of a false statement, understanding, and publication?
- That the statement resulted in special damages.
- That the statement was made with actual malice. (correct)
- That the statement was widely disseminated.
- That the statement caused emotional distress.
Which of the following is the key distinction between libel and slander regarding proof of injury?
Which of the following is the key distinction between libel and slander regarding proof of injury?
- Slander and libel both require proof of actual injury.
- Slander requires proof of actual injury, whereas libel does not. (correct)
- Libel requires proof of special damages, while slander does not.
- Libel requires proof of malice, while slander does not.
Which of the following scenarios would most likely be protected under privileged speech, thus preventing a defamation claim?
Which of the following scenarios would most likely be protected under privileged speech, thus preventing a defamation claim?
- A politician making false accusations about a private citizen on social media.
- A journalist publishing a controversial article based on anonymous sources.
- Statements made during cross-examination in a courtroom setting. (correct)
- An individual posting a negative review of a local business online.
Which scenario best exemplifies fraudulent misrepresentation?
Which scenario best exemplifies fraudulent misrepresentation?
What does 'appropriation of identity' in the context of invasion of privacy primarily involve?
What does 'appropriation of identity' in the context of invasion of privacy primarily involve?
In the context of wrongful interference with a business relationship, what differentiates legitimate competition from actionable interference?
In the context of wrongful interference with a business relationship, what differentiates legitimate competition from actionable interference?
What constitutes 'actual malice' in the context of defamation?
What constitutes 'actual malice' in the context of defamation?
Which scenario exemplifies wrongful interference with a contractual relationship?
Which scenario exemplifies wrongful interference with a contractual relationship?
A company headquartered in Delaware believes it has been wronged by a vendor in Texas. Under what circumstances would a California court have venue?
A company headquartered in Delaware believes it has been wronged by a vendor in Texas. Under what circumstances would a California court have venue?
A group of consumers wants to sue a company for false advertising, but none of them have suffered any actual damages. What legal principle would likely prevent them from bringing suit?
A group of consumers wants to sue a company for false advertising, but none of them have suffered any actual damages. What legal principle would likely prevent them from bringing suit?
After losing a case in a trial court, the losing party appeals. The appellate court agrees with the trial court's decision. What action will the appellate court take?
After losing a case in a trial court, the losing party appeals. The appellate court agrees with the trial court's decision. What action will the appellate court take?
A business dispute arises, and both parties want to resolve it quickly and inexpensively while maintaining a positive relationship. Which ADR method would be most suitable?
A business dispute arises, and both parties want to resolve it quickly and inexpensively while maintaining a positive relationship. Which ADR method would be most suitable?
Two companies have a contract with an arbitration clause. A dispute arises, and one company wants to sue in court, while the other wants to enforce the arbitration clause. What will a court likely do?
Two companies have a contract with an arbitration clause. A dispute arises, and one company wants to sue in court, while the other wants to enforce the arbitration clause. What will a court likely do?
In an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator makes a decision that one party believes is completely unfair and not supported by the evidence. What recourse does that party have?
In an arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator makes a decision that one party believes is completely unfair and not supported by the evidence. What recourse does that party have?
A contract contains the following clause: 'All disputes related to this Agreement shall be resolved by a single arbitrator through the American Arbitration Association under its commercial rules in Orange County, CA.' What does this clause dictate?
A contract contains the following clause: 'All disputes related to this Agreement shall be resolved by a single arbitrator through the American Arbitration Association under its commercial rules in Orange County, CA.' What does this clause dictate?
Which scenario exemplifies the application of Stare Decisis?
Which scenario exemplifies the application of Stare Decisis?
A company discovers a potential safety risk associated with one of its products. According to ethical business decision-making, what should the company do first?
A company discovers a potential safety risk associated with one of its products. According to ethical business decision-making, what should the company do first?
Which of the following is a key characteristic that distinguishes arbitration from mediation?
Which of the following is a key characteristic that distinguishes arbitration from mediation?
What is the key distinction between substantive and procedural law?
What is the key distinction between substantive and procedural law?
Which action represents 'rescission' in the context of contract law?
Which action represents 'rescission' in the context of contract law?
In the legal reasoning process, what step directly precedes reaching a conclusion?
In the legal reasoning process, what step directly precedes reaching a conclusion?
What is the primary focus of criminal law compared to civil law?
What is the primary focus of criminal law compared to civil law?
A business is operating in a developing area with limited legal precedent regarding a new technology they've introduced. To navigate potential legal challenges, what should the business prioritize?
A business is operating in a developing area with limited legal precedent regarding a new technology they've introduced. To navigate potential legal challenges, what should the business prioritize?
A company faces a crisis where its actions, though legal, are perceived as unethical by the public. What potential long-term consequence should the company be most concerned about?
A company faces a crisis where its actions, though legal, are perceived as unethical by the public. What potential long-term consequence should the company be most concerned about?
A company discovers that while they are in legal compliance, their labor practices are considered unethical. Following the concept of 'moral minimum', what is the MOST appropriate next step for the company?
A company discovers that while they are in legal compliance, their labor practices are considered unethical. Following the concept of 'moral minimum', what is the MOST appropriate next step for the company?
A U.S. company discovers that its overseas suppliers are using sweatshop labor. If the U.S. company demands improved working conditions or threatens to terminate the business relationship, this is an example of:
A U.S. company discovers that its overseas suppliers are using sweatshop labor. If the U.S. company demands improved working conditions or threatens to terminate the business relationship, this is an example of:
What is the primary purpose of a company implementing a 'Code of Conduct'?
What is the primary purpose of a company implementing a 'Code of Conduct'?
Which legal principle was established by the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803)?
Which legal principle was established by the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803)?
A resident of Florida wants to sue a company incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Texas, after being injured by their product in Florida. Which of the following factors would MOST strongly support a Florida court having jurisdiction over the company?
A resident of Florida wants to sue a company incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Texas, after being injured by their product in Florida. Which of the following factors would MOST strongly support a Florida court having jurisdiction over the company?
A plaintiff is suing a defendant for breach of contract. Before the case can be heard in court, what three requirements must be met?
A plaintiff is suing a defendant for breach of contract. Before the case can be heard in court, what three requirements must be met?
A California resident purchases a product online from an Arizona-based company. The product malfunctions and causes significant damage. If the Arizona company has no other contacts with California, under what circumstances would a California court MOST LIKELY have jurisdiction over the Arizona company?
A California resident purchases a product online from an Arizona-based company. The product malfunctions and causes significant damage. If the Arizona company has no other contacts with California, under what circumstances would a California court MOST LIKELY have jurisdiction over the Arizona company?
Which of the following scenarios BEST illustrates a court exercising 'in rem' jurisdiction?
Which of the following scenarios BEST illustrates a court exercising 'in rem' jurisdiction?
A company manufactures a batch of toys with lead paint, violating its own safety standards. Which type of product defect does this exemplify?
A company manufactures a batch of toys with lead paint, violating its own safety standards. Which type of product defect does this exemplify?
A pharmaceutical company fails to list a common side effect of a drug, leading a patient to suffer unforeseen complications. Under which product liability theory could the company be held liable?
A pharmaceutical company fails to list a common side effect of a drug, leading a patient to suffer unforeseen complications. Under which product liability theory could the company be held liable?
An individual is injured while improperly using a lawnmower to trim a hedge. Which defense against product liability claims would the manufacturer likely assert?
An individual is injured while improperly using a lawnmower to trim a hedge. Which defense against product liability claims would the manufacturer likely assert?
Multiple manufacturers produce a generic drug with similar harmful effects, making it difficult to identify the exact manufacturer responsible for a plaintiff's injury. Which theory of liability might apply?
Multiple manufacturers produce a generic drug with similar harmful effects, making it difficult to identify the exact manufacturer responsible for a plaintiff's injury. Which theory of liability might apply?
An electrician, aware of the risks, bypasses safety features on a power tool, resulting in injury. Which defense might the manufacturer use to avoid liability?
An electrician, aware of the risks, bypasses safety features on a power tool, resulting in injury. Which defense might the manufacturer use to avoid liability?
A state law provides immunity to vaccine manufacturers from liability claims related to vaccine side effects. This is an example of:
A state law provides immunity to vaccine manufacturers from liability claims related to vaccine side effects. This is an example of:
What must a plaintiff typically prove in a design defect case that they wouldn't need to prove in a manufacturing defect case?
What must a plaintiff typically prove in a design defect case that they wouldn't need to prove in a manufacturing defect case?
A person is injured by a visibly sharp knife while cutting vegetables. Which defense would most likely protect the knife manufacturer from liability?
A person is injured by a visibly sharp knife while cutting vegetables. Which defense would most likely protect the knife manufacturer from liability?
In the context of strict liability, which scenario best exemplifies an 'abnormally dangerous activity'?
In the context of strict liability, which scenario best exemplifies an 'abnormally dangerous activity'?
A homeowner's pet dog, which has never shown aggression, bites a guest. Under what circumstances would the homeowner likely be held strictly liable for the injury?
A homeowner's pet dog, which has never shown aggression, bites a guest. Under what circumstances would the homeowner likely be held strictly liable for the injury?
A manufacturing company outsources the production of a critical component for its flagship product. If this component is later found to be defective and causes harm to consumers, which of the following is true regarding the manufacturer's liability?
A manufacturing company outsources the production of a critical component for its flagship product. If this component is later found to be defective and causes harm to consumers, which of the following is true regarding the manufacturer's liability?
A tire manufacturer sells tires to a car manufacturer, who then installs them on new vehicles. A consumer purchases a car, and later, a tire blows out due to a defect, causing an accident. Can the consumer sue the tire manufacturer directly, even though they did not purchase the tires directly from them?
A tire manufacturer sells tires to a car manufacturer, who then installs them on new vehicles. A consumer purchases a car, and later, a tire blows out due to a defect, causing an accident. Can the consumer sue the tire manufacturer directly, even though they did not purchase the tires directly from them?
A company produces a cleaning product and falsely advertises that it is safe for all surfaces, despite knowing it can damage certain materials. A consumer uses the product on a delicate surface, causing damage. On what legal basis could the company be held liable?
A company produces a cleaning product and falsely advertises that it is safe for all surfaces, despite knowing it can damage certain materials. A consumer uses the product on a delicate surface, causing damage. On what legal basis could the company be held liable?
Which of the following reflects the public policy rationale behind strict product liability?
Which of the following reflects the public policy rationale behind strict product liability?
A company designs a new kitchen appliance. To meet their duty of care, what factors should the company consider during product design?
A company designs a new kitchen appliance. To meet their duty of care, what factors should the company consider during product design?
For a plaintiff to succeed in a strict product liability claim, what must they demonstrate about the product at the time of sale?
For a plaintiff to succeed in a strict product liability claim, what must they demonstrate about the product at the time of sale?
Flashcards
Restraining Order
Restraining Order
A court order to protect someone from harm or harassment.
Rescission
Rescission
Cancelling a contract and returning to the original agreement.
Compensatory Damages
Compensatory Damages
Money or item of value awarded by a court to compensate for damages or loss.
Equitable Relief
Equitable Relief
Signup and view all the flashcards
Stare Decisis
Stare Decisis
Signup and view all the flashcards
Civil Law
Civil Law
Signup and view all the flashcards
CyberLaw
CyberLaw
Signup and view all the flashcards
Business Ethics
Business Ethics
Signup and view all the flashcards
Moral Minimum
Moral Minimum
Signup and view all the flashcards
Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility
Signup and view all the flashcards
Codes of Conduct
Codes of Conduct
Signup and view all the flashcards
Judicial Review
Judicial Review
Signup and view all the flashcards
Lawsuit Requirements
Lawsuit Requirements
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jurisdiction over Person
Jurisdiction over Person
Signup and view all the flashcards
Long-Arm Statutes
Long-Arm Statutes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Minimum Contacts
Minimum Contacts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Venue
Venue
Signup and view all the flashcards
Standing to Sue
Standing to Sue
Signup and view all the flashcards
Trial Courts
Trial Courts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Affirm, Reverse, Remand
Affirm, Reverse, Remand
Signup and view all the flashcards
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negotiation (ADR)
Negotiation (ADR)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mediation (ADR)
Mediation (ADR)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defamation
Defamation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Slander
Slander
Signup and view all the flashcards
Libel
Libel
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defenses to Defamation
Defenses to Defamation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Privileged Speech
Privileged Speech
Signup and view all the flashcards
Appropriation of Identity
Appropriation of Identity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wrongful Interference
Wrongful Interference
Signup and view all the flashcards
Strict Liability
Strict Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Abnormally Dangerous Activities
Abnormally Dangerous Activities
Signup and view all the flashcards
Product Liability
Product Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Product Design Safety
Product Design Safety
Signup and view all the flashcards
Material Selection
Material Selection
Signup and view all the flashcards
Production Process
Production Process
Signup and view all the flashcards
Warnings & Instructions
Warnings & Instructions
Signup and view all the flashcards
No Privity Required
No Privity Required
Signup and view all the flashcards
Manufacturing Defect
Manufacturing Defect
Signup and view all the flashcards
Design Defect
Design Defect
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inadequate Warnings
Inadequate Warnings
Signup and view all the flashcards
Market-Share Liability
Market-Share Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Bystander's Rights
Bystander's Rights
Signup and view all the flashcards
Preemption by Government
Preemption by Government
Signup and view all the flashcards
Product Misuse
Product Misuse
Signup and view all the flashcards
Comparative Responsibility
Comparative Responsibility
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- "Law" is defined as enforceable rules.
- Law provides stability, continuity, and predictability.
- Black letter law describes clear, well-settled legal principles established by courts.
- Critical thinking and legal reasoning skills are important in law.
- Civil law aims to provide compensation for damages/losses.
- Intellectual property includes trademarks, copyrights, and patents.
- The constitution is the supreme law of the land.
- State constitutions exist as sources of law.
- The Bill of Rights, a series of Amendments to the Constitution adopted in 1789, provides protections for individuals and "legal persons" from federal government interference.
- The First Amendment guarantees freedoms of religion, speech, press, and the right to assemble peaceably.
- The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms.
- The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures of persons or property.
- The Fifth Amendment prohibits compulsory self-incrimination/double jeopardy.
- The Sixth Amendment guarantees the accused in criminal cases the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, as well as the right to cross-examine witnesses
- The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to trial by jury.
- The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law.
- The Supreme Court has 9 members.
- The Supreme Court ensures equal justice under the law.
Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption
- A direct conflict between federal and state law renders the state law invalid.
- When the U.S. Congress acts exclusively in a concurrent area, federal law/regulation will preempt (prevent) state/local law or regulation and take precedence.
- American Law has various sources that may be constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law and case law.
- Statutory law includes uniform laws.
- The Uniform Commercial Code (ARTICLE 2) is an example of statutory law.
- Administrative law is overseen by entities such as the SEC.
- Case law consists of court decisions.
England and the Common Law
- American colonial heritage is rooted in English Common Law, incorporating traditions, social customs, rules, and cases.
- English Common Law dates back to the 1066 A.D. Battle of Hastings, where French-Normans led by William the Conqueror defeated the English King Harold and the Saxons.
- "King's Courts" established by William the Conqueror applied a uniform set of customs and general rules throughout the kingdom.
Common Law Tradition
- It comprised of 2 separate law court systems: courts of law (remedy) and courts of equity (non-monetary relief).
Remedies of Equity
- Courts can offer specific performance, injunctions, and recission.
- Specific Performance: courts can order arena gives exactly what the buyer wants.
- Injunction: court orders a party to stop an action such as intellectual property infringement; restraining order.
- Recission: going back to original contract, cancelling a contract obligation.
- Courts can give remedies such as compensatory damages (money or item of value) or equitable relief.
Stare Decisis
- Stare Decisis is judge-made law; courts and judges should honor "precedent"—prior decisions, rulings, and opinions.
- Stare Decisis adds stability and predictability to the law.
- Stare Decisis serves as a binding guide for future cases.
- A state or federal court decision shall not be overturned unless there is a compelling reason, as exemplified in Roe v Wade.
- "First impression" cases allow court refer to public policy.
Legal Reasoning Process
- Isolate key facts and issues.
- Determine what rules of law govern the matter.
- Apply the rules of law to the particular facts and issues.
- Reach a business decision based on that.
Classifications that apply to law
- Substantive law: provides employees with the right to workers' compensation benefits for on-the-job injuries.
- Procedural law: establishes the method for an employee to notify the employer and prove the on-the-job injury.
- Civil law: spells out the rights and duties between persons and between persons and their government; OJ Simpson trial (tort/Wrongful Death).
- Criminal law: concerns wrongs against society and the ‘public as a whole'; criminal acts are prosecuted by public officials, such as a district attorney, and not by victims or third parties; OJ Simpson trial (crime/Murder).
- CyberLaw: the legal framework that governs activities and transactions conducted online or through digital technologies.
- Primary sources of US law are Statutory and Administrative law.
Ethics in Business
- Ethics is the study of right or wrong behavior
- Importance of ethical business practices: considering short-term profit vs. long-term and potential damage to the company's reputation
- Ethics are sourced by: Family, teachers, and religion.
Making Ethical Business Decisions
- Evaluate legal implications, public relations impact (including social media), safety risks for consumers and employees, and financial implications.
- Relationship of laws and ethics: compliance with the law= “moral minimum”
Rise of Corporate Social Responsibility
- Those who manage corporations should be responsible for their actions (good citizens).
- "Codes of Conduct” includes a set of rules which is commonly written for employees of a company, which protects the business and informs the employees of the company's expectations
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Marbury v. Madison (1803): first Supreme Court case that established judicial review
- Indian removal act happened during the tenth year of Andrew Jackson
Lawsuit Requirements
- Before a lawsuit can be brought before a court, three requirements must be met: Jurisdiction, Venue, and Standing to sue
- Jurisdiction: "Juris" (law) “diction” (to speak) is the power of a court to hear a dispute and to "speak the law” into a controversy and render a verdict that is legally binding on the parties to the dispute.
- Jurisdiction over the person: Gives a court the power to force the parties to appear in court and respond to the complaint; failure to appear can result in a default judgment.
- Jurisdiction over property: Gives the court jurisdiction over property within its geographical borders; Rem gives the court the power to decide, whether it's personal or tangible/intangible.
- Jurisdiction over an out-of-state person: “Long-arm” statutes are used to obtain jurisdiction for non-resident parties; must satisfy “minimum contacts”; The party you're seeking must also have property/business in the state that you're suing them in. California plaintiffs have the ability to get Arizona assets if they don't show up.
- Jurisdiction over the subject matter: U.S. bankruptcy courts are handled by federal law; Probate courts are state courts.
- Original jurisdiction: Lowest court - Trial Court (starting point); 4 federal district courts in California (2 in Santa Ana).
- Appellate jurisdiction: California court of appeals, or U.S federal court of appeal for the Ninth Circuit; have power to hear an appeal from a court trial decision
- Jurisdiction of the U.S Federal courts: Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
- "Diversity of Citizenship” cases require the parties to be residents of different states, the controversy must be greater than $75, and the Corporation = state that it is in or it headquarters.
- Exclusive jurisdiction: Federal and state courts have exclusive jurisdiction over certain cases.
- Concurrent jurisdiction: booth state and federal have the ability to hear and adjudicate a case
Jurisdiction of Courts in Cyberspace
- Decided through the Sliding Scale Standard.
- Consider: Did they conduct substantial business over the internet? Do they engage in activity over the internet with a third party? Is the defendant engaged in ‘passive' advertising through the website?
International Jurisdictional Issues
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Wang Huoqing (2011): U.S. federal district court in Northern California exercised jurisdiction in a trademark infringement case against a Chinese national.
- Wang advertised and sold “counterfeit" goods over the internet and made one internet sale to an underover investigator in California.
- Wang never showed up in Court so Gucci got a default judgement.
Venue
- Venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for the trial; generally where the injury or wrong occurred.
Standing to Sue
- The company must have “standing” to bring a lawsuit
- The party must have a sufficient “stake” (reason) in the controversy.
- There Must be a “justiciable controversy”.
Trial Courts
- General Jurisdiction and Limited Jurisdiction
- Appellate: affirm, reverse, remand
- U.S. Supreme Court= 9 justices.
- ADR Alternative dispute resolution: resolve disputes, may be less expensive/more efficient
Alternative dispute resolution methods
- Negotiation: is an informal, unstructured process where parties, sometimes without attorneys, resolve differences through preparation, strategy, and evidence to reach a mutually agreeable settlement.
- Mediation: oldest forms of ADR, neutral third-party mediator facilitates discussions between disputing parties, often encouraging compromise to reach a settlement.
- advantages: few procedural rules, parties select the mediator, Antagonistic behavior.
- disadvantages: Mediator can only help parties reach a settlement, mediator can't impose a deadline
- Arbitration: Written into the contract; Formal ADR process; A neutral arbitrator, appointed per an agreement arbitration provision, hears the case with subject-matter expertise and renders a legally binding decision.
- Arbitration Clause: shall be resolved by a single arbitrator through the American Arbitration Association under its commercial rules in Orange County, CA. Court: Award shall remain confidential unless required by law.
- the FAA does not dictate arbitration procedures but enforces arbitration agreements and awards. Courts must uphold arbitrators' decisions without second-guessing.
- The arbitration process begins with the Claimant filing a petition against the Respondent, after which a case manager helps select an arbitrator. The arbitrator holds a preliminary scheduling hearing, followed by a full hearing where both parties present evidence. Finally, the arbitrator issues a decision/award, which can be enforced by a court if necessary.
- Mandatory employment and health care arbitration clauses are generally enforceable.
- Class-action waivers in arbitration agreements are debated but upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Courts rarely vacate (set aside) an arbitrator's decision; findings and conclusions are final.
- Arbitration agreements limit court interference, even if errors exist.
- Courts may set aside an award only if: Arbitrator showed bias/corruption, Key evidence was ignored, A major conflict of interest was undisclosed, or Arbitrator's misconduct harmed a party's rights.
- Pro se: person is representing themselves in court
Court Procedures
- 'adversarial system of justice': Lawyer/advocate uses the clients Facts toward the judge or jury to convince them that the clients' facts are correct.
- Lawsuits include a Pretrial, Trial and Post trial.
- Attorneys compensation includes Contingency fee arrangement, hourly fee and Monthly retainer fee.
- Best way to find an attorney by reference, not from a billboard.
- In pre-trial phase, pleadings and motions are important.
- Plaintiffs complaint creates a cause of action.
- Service of process: personal or via email.
- Defendant's answer can include: Affirmative defense and counterclaims; pretrial motions.
- Typical complaint is a negligence case.
- If a person is injured in an accident, they will file a lawsuit against a person or entity alleging that the other party was negligent and failed to exercise care.
Litigation Stages in Pretrial
- Depositions, written interrogations, requests for documents, or Electronic discovery.
- Metadata: what will happen is emails can leave info left behind tracing back to the identifiers.
- Affidavits (sworn statements by parties or witnesses given written testimony).
- "Hearsay evidence” is generally not admissible at trial.
- Litigation stages in Trial include right to trial by jury.
- At the Trial phase is jury selection.
At Trial
- Trials can be with or without a jury.
- Voir Dire: Attorneys ask questions to uncover possible juror bias; either attorney can challenge a juror and request them not to be sworn in as a juror.
- At Trial includes an adversarial process, opening arguments by attorneys, plaintiffs case presented, and defendants case presented.
- Direct testimony from plaintiff witnesses.
- Standard of Proof: “Preponderance of the Evidence” in civil cases is much less strict than criminal cases which is “Guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt") standard
- Verdict/Judgment/Award
Post-Trial
- Parties file brief pointing out legal “reversible error” by the court.
- Appellate review: Courts don't consider new information; rule strictly on the recorded information
Post-Trial: Enforcing Judgement in Civil Cases
- Plaintiff looks to see if the defendant has sufficient assets before the suit is filed.
- Writ of Execution: directs sheriff to seize the defendant's non-exempt property and sell them to pay for the judgement.
- Defendant will file for BANKRUPTCY.
Tort Law
- Tort = Wrongs or Compensation
- Tort is designed to compensate those who have suffered loss or injury due to someone else's wrong
- Remedies are made for violation of protected interests such as physical safety.
- Compensatory damages reimburse plaintiffs for actual loss.
- Special Damages: quantifiable losses which is calculated damages property.
- General Damages: non-monetary losses- such as loss of companionship or consortium, loss of reputation, disfigurement
- Punitive Damages: are designed to punish wrongdoers and deter others from similar conduct.
- Two types of torts: Intentional and Unintentional.
- Intentional act that causes another person to be apprehensive of immediate harm.
- Battery: Only comes with action; if someone followed through and hit someone.
Types of Torts
- False imprisonment: somebody restricts ability to move without approval/justification.
- Infliction of emotional distress: Conduct resulting in emotional distress.
- Defamation: refrain from false statements; must have proof requirements.
- Slander: Verbally said something not true, plaintiff must prove special damages.
- Libel: written statement; plaintiff doesn't have to prove actual injury.
- Defense includes Truth is an absolute defense; privilege; actual malice.
- Invasion of Privacy: A person has the right to solitude and freedom from prying public eyes; appropriation of identity; right of publicity.
- Fraudent Misrepresentation: Tortfessor leads another to believe in a condition that is different from the condition that actually exists.
- Wrongful death; wrongful interference with a contractual or business relationship.
- Intentional Torts against property such as trespass.
Unintentional Torts
- Unintentional tort of negligence that occurs when someone suffers injury because of another's failure to live up to a required duty of care; didn't wish to bring about an accident.
- Evaluate: Did the defendentent owe a duty of care to the plaintiff? Was there Breach? Was the action Proximate Cause of plaintiffs injury?
Negligence
- Individuals must exercise reasonable care standard in their actions.
- Negligence Cases: The level of care required varies based on factors like the defendant's occupation and relationship with the plaintiff..
- Landowners/Landlords: Must exercise reasonable care to protect visitors from harm .
- Retailers/Storekeepers: Must warn customers of foreseeable risks Professionals: Owe a higher duty of care due to their specialized knowledge; breach known as professional malpractice. Causation in Negligence Cases must have causation and proximate cause, and must be foreseeable.
- Legal Protections: Good Samaritan Statutes protect individuals help others being sued;
- "Dram Shop" & Social Host Liability: Can be held liable if they serve alcohol to intoxicated person later causes harm.
Negligence Claims
- Assumption of Risk: A plaintiff who is aware of a risk and voluntarily participates in the activity cannot claim negligence.
- Contributory Negligence: plaintiff is even slightly negligent, they cannot recover damages from the defendant.
- Comparative Negligence: The fault is divided between the plaintiff and defendant, and damages are assigned accordingly
- Strict Liability: A legal doctrine where a person is held responsible for harm caused by activities, without fault.
Key Areas of Strict Liability are Abnormally Dangerous Activities
- Such as blasting operations.
Keeping Animals
- Owners of wild animals are strictly liable for any harm caused.
-
- Domestic animal owners are liable if they knew/should have known the animal was dangerous; can also apply to Product Liability applies to manufacturers.
- Product Liability is based on negligence or misrepresentation.
Manufacturer's Duties of Care
- Product Design, Material Selection and process and Inspections, including warnings and instructions.
Legal Considerations in Product Liability
- Privity of Contract Not Required: Parties can sue manufacturers without a agreement.
- Misrepresentation: fraud
- Example include: consumer sues a tire blowout
Strict Product Liability is Based on public policy
- Strict Product Liability protects consumers from unsafe products and ensures manufactures can't mislead consumers.
Requirements for strict Product Liability
- Product was defective when sold, Defect made the product unreasonably dangerous, the Plaintiff suffered some harm due to product, and the product wasn't significantly damaged.
- Types of Product Defects, when a product departs from its design can be a manufacturing defect, or it can have a design defect, or inadequate warnings.
- Product is inherently unsafe due design
- If a plaintiff can prove alternative was available Additional Considerations in Product Liability.
- When multiple manufacturers produce similar harmful products, each can be held liable based on market share.
Bystanders
- When multiple manufacturers produce similar products, each is liable.
- Component part supplies can be held liable
- Preemption by Government Regulation and Limitations.
Defenses Against Product Liability Claims
- Claims such as consumers use products incorrectly, or if responsibility should the plaintiff be the at cause, or if there are Commonly Known Dangers, is a knowledgeable user present, and statutes of limitations and repose may be taken into consideration.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.