Critical Reasoning Skills Quiz

A method of learning that involves active engagement and interaction between participants.

The ability to analyze information, identify assumptions, evaluate evidence, consider different perspectives, and draw conclusions.

3 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) points, representing the workload and learning outcomes of a module.

A unique identifier assigned to a specific course within an academic program.

The year of study within a program, typically referring to the first year.

The specific period during which a module is taught, usually within a semester.

The form of instruction used in a module, such as lectures, workshops, or online learning.

The individual(s) responsible for overseeing and coordinating the module.

The ability to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a particular argument.

Breaking down an argument into its individual parts to analyze its structure and logic.

Creating your own argument by providing evidence and using logic.

Establishing a common language and understanding of terms and concepts related to critical thinking.

A way of analyzing and outlining arguments by breaking them down into their core components, focusing on claims, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal.

Refers to the way a person approaches and engages with the world around them. It involves an individual's curiosity, self-reflection, and general attitude.

A fast, intuitive, and automatic way of thinking that relies on pre-existing knowledge and experiences. It's often used for making quick decisions and judgments.

A slower, more deliberate, and analytical way of thinking that requires effort and conscious attention. It's used for complex problem-solving and reasoning.

A systematic error in thinking that can influence our judgments and decisions. It's a result of our brains taking shortcuts or using heuristics, which can sometimes lead to incorrect interpretations.

An argument that uses emotional appeals instead of logic or evidence to persuade, often targeting the listener's feelings or fears.

An argument that wrongly assumes that because two things happened in sequence, one caused the other.

An argument based on the belief that because someone has authority or status, their opinion is automatically correct.

An argument that assumes the truth of the claim it's trying to prove.

An argument that draws a conclusion based on just one or a few examples, which may not be representative of a larger group.

A statement that challenges the main claim or argument, highlighting potential exceptions or counterpoints.

The part of a Toulmin model which specifies the limitations of the main claim, considering the rebuttal.

Shortcuts or mental rules of thumb that help simplify decision-making. They can be useful but can sometimes lead to biases.

Mental accounting is a psychological process where people categorize spending and income into separate mental accounts, often leading to irrational decision-making.

Sunk costs are expenses that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Rational decision-making ignores sunk costs.

Cognitive dissonance is a psychological state of discomfort that arises when a person holds conflicting beliefs, ideas, or values.

In the concert example, a person might choose to go to the concert even if there's a better alternative, because they don't want to 'waste' the money they spent on the ticket. This is influenced by mental accounting, sunk costs, and the desire to avoid cognitive dissonance.

Decision-making that considers sunk costs can lead to irrational and suboptimal choices.

To make better decisions, focus on the future value of your choices, not the costs you've already incurred. This is called opportunity cost analysis.

Even when presented with clear evidence and taught sound accounting principles, people are still prone to mental accounting biases in their financial decisions.

Mental accounting influences decision-making in many areas, including personal finance, business, and even healthcare.