Criminal Law: Arson Investigation and Case Study

RenewedAlexandrite6588 avatar
RenewedAlexandrite6588
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

16 Questions

What was Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo found guilty of by the Regional Trial Court of Bauang, La Union, Branch 33?

arson

What was destroyed in the fire, aside from the house of Mauro Camacho?

properties

What type of evidence was used to convict Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo?

circumstantial evidence

What was one of the reasons why Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's alibi was found unconvincing?

prosecution witnesses testified against him

What was the basis of Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's appeal?

questioning the reliance on circumstantial evidence and offering an alibi

What was the outcome of the Supreme Court's ruling on Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's case?

the decision of the Court of Appeals was affirmed, maintaining Bravo's conviction and sentence

Who was the complainant in the case of People of the Philippines vs. Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo?

Mauro Camacho

In what year did the arson incident occur?

1989

What was the significance of Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's presence at the scene of the crime?

It was one of the circumstantial evidence used to convict him of arson.

How did the prosecution witnesses contribute to the conviction of Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo?

They testified against Bravo, supporting the circumstantial evidence.

What was the underlying reason behind the appellate court's decision to uphold Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's conviction?

The court found that the circumstantial evidence presented a clear and unbroken chain pointing to Bravo as the arsonist.

How did the Supreme Court's ruling on Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's case impact the use of circumstantial evidence in the Philippines?

The ruling affirmed the reliability of circumstantial evidence in proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

What was the significance of Mauro Camacho's house in the arson case?

It was the location where the arson incident occurred, resulting in the deaths of Mrs. Shirley Camacho and her four-month-old son.

What was Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's demand from Mauro Camacho, and how did it relate to the arson case?

He demanded an object used in witchcraft, which was later used as circumstantial evidence against him.

How did the Court of Appeals view Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo's alibi?

It was found to be weak and unreliable.

What was the outcome of the arrest and conviction of Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo?

He was sentenced to reclusion perpetua (life imprisonment).

Explore this research report on arson investigation, featuring a real-life case study on People of the Philippines vs Benjamin Bravo y Estabillo. Learn about the facts and outcomes of arson cases and their legal implications.

Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards

Convert your notes into interactive study material.

Get started for free
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser