Classification of Rape

Study Notes

Anger Rape: Sexual assault arises from the assailant's anger, featuring increased physical violence.
Power Rape: The rapist seeks to assert dominance over the victim, illustrating control rather than sexual desire.
Sadistic Rape: Combines sexual aggression with a desire to inflict pain, resulting in psychological torture for the victim.
Acquaintance Rape: Occurs between individuals who know each other, breaking societal trust.
Aggravated Rape: Involves multiple attackers, use of weapons, and resultant injuries to the victim.
Date Rape: Forcible sexual acts that happen during a dating scenario.
Serial Rape: Committed by one person repeatedly over time.
Statutory Rape: Involves sexual relations between an adult male and an underage female, regardless of the minor's consent.

Power-Reassurance Rapist: Doubts his masculinity and seeks to assert control.
Power-Assertive Rapist: Confident in masculinity; uses rape as a means of symbolic power over women.
Anger-Retaliatory Rapist: Acts violently out of extreme anger, often linked to real or imagined wrongs from women.
Sadistic Rapist: Derives pleasure from inflicting severe pain on victims.
Opportunistic Rapist: Commits rape as a secondary crime during another offense.

Naïve Graspers: Inexperienced youths with unrealistic beliefs about female arousal; often awkward in social interactions.
Meaning Stretchers: Misinterpret friendliness as sexual consent, ignoring clear refusals from victims.

Etymologically derived from Latin "crimen" (crime) and Greek "Logos" (study).
Coined as "criminologia" by Rafael Garofalo in 1885, with Paul Topinard using "criminologie" in 1887.
Defined as the scientific study of crimes, criminals, and victims, focusing on prevention and solutions.

Making of Laws: Analyzes the structure and nature of legal frameworks.
Breaking of Laws: Investigates reasons behind crime despite existing laws.
Reaction to Breaking Laws: Studies societal responses and its influences on criminality and offender treatment.

Applied Science: Integrates various sciences such as anthropology and sociology to understand crime causes.
Social Science: Examines crime as a societal phenomenon.
Dynamic Nature: Evolves alongside social conditions and related scientific advancements.
Nationalistic Aspect: Study must be contextualized within local criminal laws.

Jeremy Bentham: Advocated for utilitarianism and the concept of the "felicific calculus" to deter crime.
Utilitarianism: Asserts that actions should contribute the greatest good for the majority.
Felicific Calculus: A method for weighing pleasure against pain in decision-making processes.
Panopticon Prison: Designed for constant surveillance where inmates cannot tell if they are being observed.

Argues for exemption from conviction under certain circumstances that limit free will.
Recognizes mitigating factors for different groups, such as children and the mentally ill.

Founders: Cesare Lombroso, Enrico Ferri, Rafae Garofalo.
Suggests that external factors can compel individuals to commit crimes, highlighting the socio-biological influences.

Conditions for teaching criminology include valid permits and adherence to ethical standards.
Clear grounds for revocation of professional registration include criminal conviction, fraud, negligence, and addiction issues.

Imprisonment and fines imposed for unauthorized practice of criminology or fraudulent activities related to professional registration.
Accountability extends to corporate entities and their responsible officers for violations.