Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the area of law that the case of Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193; [1967] 3 All ER 253 falls under?
What is the area of law that the case of Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193; [1967] 3 All ER 253 falls under?
Sale by Description, Sale of Goods Act
What year did the case of Beale v Taylor take place?
What year did the case of Beale v Taylor take place?
1967
Who was the seller in the case of Beale v Taylor?
Who was the seller in the case of Beale v Taylor?
Taylor
What was the car described as in the advertisement in the case of Beale v Taylor?
What was the car described as in the advertisement in the case of Beale v Taylor?
The car that Beale bought in the case of Beale v Taylor was actually a 1961 model.
The car that Beale bought in the case of Beale v Taylor was actually a 1961 model.
The court in the case of Beale v Taylor ruled that the seller, Taylor, was not liable for the misrepresentation of the car.
The court in the case of Beale v Taylor ruled that the seller, Taylor, was not liable for the misrepresentation of the car.
The court in Beale v Taylor determined that the buyer had not relied on the description in the advertisement.
The court in Beale v Taylor determined that the buyer had not relied on the description in the advertisement.
What issue was at the heart of the case of Beale v Taylor?
What issue was at the heart of the case of Beale v Taylor?
The case of Beale v Taylor demonstrated that even if a buyer inspects the goods, there may still be a sale by description.
The case of Beale v Taylor demonstrated that even if a buyer inspects the goods, there may still be a sale by description.
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
Study Notes
Case Name and Citation
- Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193; [1967] 3 All ER 253
- Jurisdiction: England and Wales
- Year of the case: 1967
Area of Law
- Sale by Description, Sale of Goods Act
Case Summary
- English case law concerning the implied condition of "sale by description" in a contract of sale of goods.
- A 1961 Triumph Herald was advertised for sale as a "white, 1961 Herald Convertible."
- The buyer inspected the car and saw a "1200" disc on the rear.
- The buyer believed the car conformed to the description and purchased it.
- In actuality, the car was a combination of two different Triumph Herald models (front half of an earlier model joined to the rear half of a 1961 model).
Issue
- Could the seller of the car be held accountable for failing to fulfill the sale description?
Court's Decision
- The vendor was held liable.
- The description in the advertisement was relied upon by the buyer.
- The car did not correspond to the description.
Sale by Description in Inspected Goods
- The answer depends on context.
- Even if the buyer inspected the goods, there can still be a "sale by description" if the buyer relied on descriptions.
- In Beale v Taylor, the fact that the buyer relied on both the advertisement and the visual inspection (metal disc) was sufficient to breach the sales agreement.
- Discrepancies between goods and descriptions might not be obvious immediately.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.