Beale v Taylor Case Study

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

What is the area of law that the case of Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193; [1967] 3 All ER 253 falls under?

Sale by Description, Sale of Goods Act

What year did the case of Beale v Taylor take place?

1967

Who was the seller in the case of Beale v Taylor?

Taylor

What was the car described as in the advertisement in the case of Beale v Taylor?

<p>White, 1961 Herald Convertible (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The car that Beale bought in the case of Beale v Taylor was actually a 1961 model.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The court in the case of Beale v Taylor ruled that the seller, Taylor, was not liable for the misrepresentation of the car.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The court in Beale v Taylor determined that the buyer had not relied on the description in the advertisement.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What issue was at the heart of the case of Beale v Taylor?

<p>Whether the seller could be held accountable for failing to sell the car 'as described'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of Beale v Taylor demonstrated that even if a buyer inspects the goods, there may still be a sale by description.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

Study Notes

Case Name and Citation

  • Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193; [1967] 3 All ER 253
  • Jurisdiction: England and Wales
  • Year of the case: 1967

Area of Law

  • Sale by Description, Sale of Goods Act

Case Summary

  • English case law concerning the implied condition of "sale by description" in a contract of sale of goods.
  • A 1961 Triumph Herald was advertised for sale as a "white, 1961 Herald Convertible."
  • The buyer inspected the car and saw a "1200" disc on the rear.
  • The buyer believed the car conformed to the description and purchased it.
  • In actuality, the car was a combination of two different Triumph Herald models (front half of an earlier model joined to the rear half of a 1961 model).

Issue

  • Could the seller of the car be held accountable for failing to fulfill the sale description?

Court's Decision

  • The vendor was held liable.
  • The description in the advertisement was relied upon by the buyer.
  • The car did not correspond to the description.

Sale by Description in Inspected Goods

  • The answer depends on context.
  • Even if the buyer inspected the goods, there can still be a "sale by description" if the buyer relied on descriptions.
  • In Beale v Taylor, the fact that the buyer relied on both the advertisement and the visual inspection (metal disc) was sufficient to breach the sales agreement.
  • Discrepancies between goods and descriptions might not be obvious immediately.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

More Like This

Belle Prater's Boy
15 questions

Belle Prater's Boy

ForemostSapphire avatar
ForemostSapphire
HCI: Abowd and Beale Framework
24 questions
Beale v Taylor Case Summary
11 questions

Beale v Taylor Case Summary

AffectionateEquation avatar
AffectionateEquation
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser