Beale v Taylor Case Summary
11 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the name of the case discussed in the text?

Beale v Taylor

What year was the case of Beale v Taylor decided?

1967

What area of law is Beale v Taylor concerned with?

Sale by Description, Sale of Goods Act

The car in Beale v Taylor was advertised as a "White, 1961 Herald Convertible."

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What did the buyer, Beale, find on the rear of the car that reinforced his belief it was a 1961 model?

<p>A disc marked &quot;1200&quot;</p> Signup and view all the answers

The car in Beale v Taylor was actually a combination of two cars.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the main legal question raised in the Beale v Taylor case?

<p>Could the seller be held responsible for failing to sell &quot;as described&quot;?</p> Signup and view all the answers

The court decided that the seller was not liable because the buyer should have inspected the car more thoroughly.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Can a buyer be considered to have entered into a "sale by description" agreement even if they inspected the goods?

<p>Yes</p> Signup and view all the answers

The discrepancy between the description of the goods and the actual goods is always immediately obvious.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What section of the Sale of Goods Act was potentially violated in the Beale v Taylor case?

<p>Section 13</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Beale v Taylor Case Year

The Beale v Taylor case was decided in 1967.

Beale v Taylor Case Area of Law

Beale v Taylor deals with sale of goods law, specifically sale by description.

Car Description in Beale v Taylor

The car was advertised as a "White, 1961 Herald Convertible."

Buyer's Belief in Beale v Taylor

Beale believed the car was a 1961 model based on a "1200" disc.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Car's True Nature in Beale v Taylor

The car was actually a combination of two cars.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Seller's Potential Liability in Beale v Taylor

The question was if the seller could be held responsible for the description not matching the car.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Seller's Liability Ruling in Beale v Taylor

The court didn't find the seller liable; buyer should have inspected better.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Inspection's Effect on Sale by Description

Inspection doesn't negate a 'sale by description' agreement.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Obvious Discrepancy in Sale of Goods

Discrepancies between described goods and actual goods aren't always immediately apparent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Sale of Goods Act Section in Beale v Taylor

Section 13 of the Sale of Goods Act was potentially violated.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Sale by Description Defined

A sale by description means the item is sold based on its description, not its look.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Case Name and Citation

  • Beale v Taylor [1967] 1 WLR 1193; [1967] 3 All ER 253
  • Jurisdiction: England and Wales
  • Year of the case: 1967

Area of Law

  • Sale by Description
  • Sale of Goods Act

Case Summary

  • English case law concerning the implied condition of "sale by description" in a contract of sale of goods.
  • A 1961 Triumph Herald was advertised for sale by a private seller. The advertisement described the car as a "White, 1961 Herald Convertible...".
  • The buyer (claimant) inspected the car and saw a "1200" disc on the rear, believing it was a complete 1961 model. He bought the car.
  • The car had been created by attaching the rear half of a 1961 Triumph Herald 1200 to an earlier model's front half (a 1961 model wasn't complete).

Issue

  • Could the seller be held liable for failing to sell "as described"?

Court Ruling

  • The court held the seller liable.
  • The description in the advertisement was relied upon by the buyer, and the vehicle did not correspond to the description.
  • The sale was considered a "sale by description" even though the buyer inspected the vehicle. The buyer's reliance on the description and visible part of the vehicle, (the metal disc), is part of the court ruling.

"Sale by Description" in relation to inspected goods

  • The answer depends on the circumstances.
  • Even if a buyer inspects goods, there may still be a sale by description if the buyer relied on the description.
  • In Beale v Taylor, the buyer's reliance on the description in the advertisement and the visible disc is the basis of the court's decision.
  • The discrepancy between the goods and the description in this case was not immediately obvious.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Description

Explore the landmark case Beale v Taylor, which revolves around the sale by description under the Sale of Goods Act. This case highlights the legal implications when a seller's description does not accurately match the product sold. Understand the court's ruling and its significance in consumer protection laws.

More Like This

UML Use Case Diagrams and Descriptions
10 questions
Beale v Taylor Case Study
5 questions

Beale v Taylor Case Study

AffectionateEquation avatar
AffectionateEquation
Beale v Taylor Case Study
9 questions

Beale v Taylor Case Study

AffectionateEquation avatar
AffectionateEquation
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser