Article 358 vs Article 359

Which article is confined to Fundamental Rights under Article 19 only?

Which article empowers the president to suspend the enforcement of specified Fundamental Rights?

Under which type of emergency does Article 358 operate?

For what duration does Article 358 suspend Fundamental Rights under Article 19?

Which article's extent may be limited to a part of the country?

Which article does not empower the suspension of enforcement of Articles 20 and 21?

Under which article can the State make laws or take executive action inconsistent with Fundamental Rights whose enforcement is suspended by the Presidential Order?

What is a similarity between Article 358 and Article 359 during an emergency?

What condition must be met for executive action taken under a law related to the Emergency to be protected under both Article 358 and Article 359?

Consider a scenario where an emergency is declared due to external aggression. Which article is automatically invoked, leading to a suspension of certain fundamental rights?

During an internal emergency, which article empowers the President to suspend the enforcement of specific fundamental rights?

If the government enacts a new law specifically related to managing the challenges of an ongoing emergency, which article protects this law from being challenged for inconsistency Fundamental Rights?

An executive action taken during an emergency extends beyond the scope permitted by the emergency laws. Which article would offer protection to this executive action against legal challenges?

Which is an accurate comparison of the scope of Article 358 and Article 359 during a declared emergency?

What is a key difference in the operational effect of Article 358 and Article 359 concerning the State's ability to legislate or take executive action?

In a scenario where a state government enacts a law during an emergency that infringes upon a Fundamental Right, but the enforcement of that right has not been suspended by a Presidential Order, which article, if any, would provide immunity from challenge to this law?

Considering both Article 358 and Article 359, what is the most accurate understanding of their role in safeguarding actions taken by the State during an emergency?

During an emergency, the Union government directs a state government to take specific actions that infringe upon fundamental rights. If these directions are challenged in court, how do Articles 358 and 359 influence the court's decision?

Suppose, during an external emergency, a law is enacted that curtails freedom of speech more than strictly required for national security. A citizen challenges this law, arguing it violates Article 19. How will Article 358 affect the court's consideration of this challenge?