Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was the basis of the first application brought by Mr Molaudzi?
What was the basis of the first application brought by Mr Molaudzi?
- Factual findings of the trial court (correct)
- Constitutional challenge
- Appeal against convictions and sentences
- Res judicata arguments
Why did the Full Court reject the arguments on appeal in the related cases of Mr Mhlongo and Mr Nkosi?
Why did the Full Court reject the arguments on appeal in the related cases of Mr Mhlongo and Mr Nkosi?
- Unrelated legal issues
- Lack of constitutional validity in the evidence
- No reasonable prospects of success (correct)
- Improper application process
What key issue did Mr Molaudzi argue was different between his first and second applications?
What key issue did Mr Molaudzi argue was different between his first and second applications?
- Jurisdiction of the Full Court
- Factual findings
- State's submissions
- Constitutional tenability of evidence (correct)
Why did Mr Molaudzi believe that his second application was not res judicata?
Why did Mr Molaudzi believe that his second application was not res judicata?
What was the State's stance on Mr Molaudzi's argument about raising constitutional issues?
What was the State's stance on Mr Molaudzi's argument about raising constitutional issues?
What prompted the Court to issue further directions to the parties regarding Mr Molaudzi's second application?
What prompted the Court to issue further directions to the parties regarding Mr Molaudzi's second application?
What was Mr. Molaudzi's main argument in his first application to the Court?
What was Mr. Molaudzi's main argument in his first application to the Court?
Why did Mr. Molaudzi argue that the extra-curial statement of Mr. Matjeke was inadmissible?
Why did Mr. Molaudzi argue that the extra-curial statement of Mr. Matjeke was inadmissible?
What did Mr. Molaudzi claim as the reason for the trial court being procedurally unfair?
What did Mr. Molaudzi claim as the reason for the trial court being procedurally unfair?
Why did Mr. Molaudzi's first application to the Court fail according to the judgment?
Why did Mr. Molaudzi's first application to the Court fail according to the judgment?
On what basis did Mr. Molaudzi argue that the trial court and Full Court erred?
On what basis did Mr. Molaudzi argue that the trial court and Full Court erred?
What did Mr. Molaudzi claim about Mr. Matjeke's evidence?
What did Mr. Molaudzi claim about Mr. Matjeke's evidence?
