Podcast
Questions and Answers
Let $T$ be a random variable. Which of the following conditions is both necessary and sufficient for $T$ to be a stopping time with respect to a filtration $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$?
Let $T$ be a random variable. Which of the following conditions is both necessary and sufficient for $T$ to be a stopping time with respect to a filtration $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$?
- $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \{T = n\} \in \mathcal{F}_n$ (correct)
- $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \{T \leq n\} \in \mathcal{F}_{n-1}$
- $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \{T = n\} \in \mathcal{F}_{n+1}$
- $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \{T \geq n\} \in \mathcal{F}_n$
Consider a sequence of random variables $(X_n)_{n \geq 0}$ and a measurable set $B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$. Let $T = \inf {n : X_n \in B}$ and $S = \sup {n : X_n \in B}$. Which of the following statements is generally true?
Consider a sequence of random variables $(X_n)_{n \geq 0}$ and a measurable set $B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$. Let $T = \inf {n : X_n \in B}$ and $S = \sup {n : X_n \in B}$. Which of the following statements is generally true?
- Neither $T$ nor $S$ can be stopping times.
- $S$ is a stopping time, but $T$ is not necessarily a stopping time.
- Both $T$ and $S$ are always stopping times.
- $T$ is a stopping time, but $S$ is not necessarily a stopping time. (correct)
Let $T$ be a stopping time with respect to a filtration $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$, and $X_n$ a sequence of random variables. If $X_T(\omega) = X_{T(\omega)}(\omega)$ on ${T < \infty}$ and 0 otherwise, how is the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{F}_T$ defined, encapsulating information up to the random time $T$?
Let $T$ be a stopping time with respect to a filtration $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$, and $X_n$ a sequence of random variables. If $X_T(\omega) = X_{T(\omega)}(\omega)$ on ${T < \infty}$ and 0 otherwise, how is the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{F}_T$ defined, encapsulating information up to the random time $T$?
- $\mathcal{F}_T = \{A \in \mathcal{F}_\infty : A \cap \{T > n\} \in \mathcal{F}_n \}$
- $\mathcal{F}_T = \{A \in \mathcal{F}_\infty : A \cap \{T < n\} \in \mathcal{F}_n \}$
- $\mathcal{F}_T = \{A \in \mathcal{F}_\infty : A \cap \{T \leq n\} \in \mathcal{F}_n \}$ (correct)
- $\mathcal{F}_T = \{A \in \mathcal{F}_\infty : A \cap \{T = n\} \in \mathcal{F}_n \}$
Consider stopping times $S$ and $T$. Which of the following statements regarding the relationship between $\mathcal{F}_S$ and $\mathcal{F}_T$ is correct if $S \leq T$ almost surely?
Consider stopping times $S$ and $T$. Which of the following statements regarding the relationship between $\mathcal{F}_S$ and $\mathcal{F}_T$ is correct if $S \leq T$ almost surely?
Let $(X_n){n \geq 0}$ be a sequence of random variables and $T$ a stopping time. Which of the following expressions defines the stopped process $(X{T \wedge n})_{n \geq 0}$ correctly, emphasizing the path-wise behavior of the process up to the stopping time?
Let $(X_n){n \geq 0}$ be a sequence of random variables and $T$ a stopping time. Which of the following expressions defines the stopped process $(X{T \wedge n})_{n \geq 0}$ correctly, emphasizing the path-wise behavior of the process up to the stopping time?
Given stopping times $T_n$ for $n \geq 0$, which of the following operations on the sequence $(T_n)_{n \geq 0}$ does not necessarily result in another stopping time?
Given stopping times $T_n$ for $n \geq 0$, which of the following operations on the sequence $(T_n)_{n \geq 0}$ does not necessarily result in another stopping time?
Consider a random variable $X_n^* = \max_{k \leq n} |X_k|$ representing the running maximum of a sequence of random variables $(X_n)_{n \geq 0}$. For $p > 1$ and $k > 0$, and defining $X_n^* \wedge k = \min(X_n^, k)$, which inequality relating the $L^p$ norm of $X_n^ \wedge k$ and $X_n$ is most accurate, reflecting a maximal inequality concept?
Consider a random variable $X_n^* = \max_{k \leq n} |X_k|$ representing the running maximum of a sequence of random variables $(X_n)_{n \geq 0}$. For $p > 1$ and $k > 0$, and defining $X_n^* \wedge k = \min(X_n^, k)$, which inequality relating the $L^p$ norm of $X_n^ \wedge k$ and $X_n$ is most accurate, reflecting a maximal inequality concept?
Let $X$ be a stochastic process and $T$ a stopping time with respect to the filtration $(\mathcal{F}t)$. Suppose that for every bounded martingale $M$, the process $M_t^{T} = M{t \land T}$ is also a martingale. Which of the following provides the most precise description of what can be concluded about the process $X$ and the stopping time $T$?
Let $X$ be a stochastic process and $T$ a stopping time with respect to the filtration $(\mathcal{F}t)$. Suppose that for every bounded martingale $M$, the process $M_t^{T} = M{t \land T}$ is also a martingale. Which of the following provides the most precise description of what can be concluded about the process $X$ and the stopping time $T$?
Consider a stochastic process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$. Which of the following statements, concerning the relationship between finite-dimensional distributions and the law of $X$, is most accurate under general conditions?
Consider a stochastic process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$. Which of the following statements, concerning the relationship between finite-dimensional distributions and the law of $X$, is most accurate under general conditions?
Suppose $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a stochastic process. Which of the following statements most accurately describes the relationship between the process being cadlag and its sample paths?
Suppose $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a stochastic process. Which of the following statements most accurately describes the relationship between the process being cadlag and its sample paths?
Let $X: [0, \infty) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of the statement that $X$ is a cadlag function?
Let $X: [0, \infty) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of the statement that $X$ is a cadlag function?
In the context of Kolmogorov's criterion, given random variables $(\rho_t)_{t \in I}$ where $I \subseteq [0, 1]$ is dense, and assuming $k\rho_t - \rho_s k_p \leq C|t - s|^{\beta}$ for some $p > 1$ and $\beta > \frac{1}{p}$, what is the most precise interpretation of the role of the condition $\beta > \frac{1}{p}$?
In the context of Kolmogorov's criterion, given random variables $(\rho_t)_{t \in I}$ where $I \subseteq [0, 1]$ is dense, and assuming $k\rho_t - \rho_s k_p \leq C|t - s|^{\beta}$ for some $p > 1$ and $\beta > \frac{1}{p}$, what is the most precise interpretation of the role of the condition $\beta > \frac{1}{p}$?
Consider the space $D([0, \infty), \mathbb{R})$ of cadlag functions. Which of the following statements is most accurate concerning the $\sigma$-algebra typically used on this space?
Consider the space $D([0, \infty), \mathbb{R})$ of cadlag functions. Which of the following statements is most accurate concerning the $\sigma$-algebra typically used on this space?
Suppose we have a collection of random variables $(\rho_t){t \in I}$, where $I \subseteq [0, 1]$ is a dense set. Under the conditions of Kolmogorov's criterion, specifically assuming that for some $p > 1$ and $\beta > \frac{1}{p}$, we have $E[|\rho_t - \rho_s|^p] \leq C|t - s|^{\beta}$ for all $t, s \in I$, which of the following additional conditions is absolutely necessary to ensure the uniqueness (in the almost sure sense) of the continuous modification $(X_t){t \in [0,1]}$ such that $X_t = \rho_t$ almost surely for all $t \in I$?
Suppose we have a collection of random variables $(\rho_t){t \in I}$, where $I \subseteq [0, 1]$ is a dense set. Under the conditions of Kolmogorov's criterion, specifically assuming that for some $p > 1$ and $\beta > \frac{1}{p}$, we have $E[|\rho_t - \rho_s|^p] \leq C|t - s|^{\beta}$ for all $t, s \in I$, which of the following additional conditions is absolutely necessary to ensure the uniqueness (in the almost sure sense) of the continuous modification $(X_t){t \in [0,1]}$ such that $X_t = \rho_t$ almost surely for all $t \in I$?
Consider a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ and two probability measures $P$ and $Q$ on it. If $Q$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $P$, which of the following statements must hold regarding the Radon-Nikodym derivative $\frac{dQ}{dP}$?
Consider a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ and two probability measures $P$ and $Q$ on it. If $Q$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $P$, which of the following statements must hold regarding the Radon-Nikodym derivative $\frac{dQ}{dP}$?
Let $P$ and $Q$ be two probability measures on a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$. Suppose that $Q$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $P$. Which of the following conditions is sufficient to ensure the existence of a bounded Radon-Nikodym derivative $\frac{dQ}{dP}$?
Let $P$ and $Q$ be two probability measures on a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$. Suppose that $Q$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $P$. Which of the following conditions is sufficient to ensure the existence of a bounded Radon-Nikodym derivative $\frac{dQ}{dP}$?
Given a stochastic process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$, which of the following statements best differentiates between the concepts of continuity and cadlag properties in the context of stochastic processes?
Given a stochastic process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$, which of the following statements best differentiates between the concepts of continuity and cadlag properties in the context of stochastic processes?
Consider a probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ and a sub-sigma algebra $\mathcal{G} \subseteq \mathcal{F}$. Let $X$ be a random variable such that $E[|X|] < \infty$. If the conditional expectation $E[X | \mathcal{G}]$ is pathwise unique (i.e., any version of the conditional expectation is equal $P$-almost surely), what deeper property does this imply about the structure of $\mathcal{G}$ and its relationship to $X$?
Consider a probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ and a sub-sigma algebra $\mathcal{G} \subseteq \mathcal{F}$. Let $X$ be a random variable such that $E[|X|] < \infty$. If the conditional expectation $E[X | \mathcal{G}]$ is pathwise unique (i.e., any version of the conditional expectation is equal $P$-almost surely), what deeper property does this imply about the structure of $\mathcal{G}$ and its relationship to $X$?
Let $X_t$ be a stochastic process indexed by $t \in [0, \infty)$. Suppose $X_t$ satisfies Kolmogorov's criterion on a dense subset $I \subseteq [0, 1]$. Which of the following statements regarding the Hölder continuity of the resulting continuous modification is the most precise?
Let $X_t$ be a stochastic process indexed by $t \in [0, \infty)$. Suppose $X_t$ satisfies Kolmogorov's criterion on a dense subset $I \subseteq [0, 1]$. Which of the following statements regarding the Hölder continuity of the resulting continuous modification is the most precise?
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space. Suppose $(X_n)_{n \geq 0}$ is a martingale with respect to a filtration $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$. Under what conditions does the martingale converge both almost surely and in $L^1$?
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space. Suppose $(X_n)_{n \geq 0}$ is a martingale with respect to a filtration $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$. Under what conditions does the martingale converge both almost surely and in $L^1$?
Consider a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ and a $\sigma$-finite measure $\mu$ on it. If a positive function $f$ satisfies $\int_A f d\mu = 0$ for all $A \in \mathcal{F}$, what can be definitively concluded about the function $f$?
Consider a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ and a $\sigma$-finite measure $\mu$ on it. If a positive function $f$ satisfies $\int_A f d\mu = 0$ for all $A \in \mathcal{F}$, what can be definitively concluded about the function $f$?
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space, and let $(X_n){n \geq 1}$ be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with $E[X_1] = 0$ and $E[X_1^2] = 1$. Define $S_n = \sum{i=1}^n X_i$. Which of the following statements accurately describes the asymptotic behavior of $\frac{S_n}{\sqrt{n}}$?
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space, and let $(X_n){n \geq 1}$ be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with $E[X_1] = 0$ and $E[X_1^2] = 1$. Define $S_n = \sum{i=1}^n X_i$. Which of the following statements accurately describes the asymptotic behavior of $\frac{S_n}{\sqrt{n}}$?
Suppose $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ is a probability space and $X$ is an integrable random variable. Let $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$ be a filtration. If $X_n = E[X | \mathcal{F}n]$, under what condition is $(X_n){n \geq 0}$ guaranteed to be a uniformly integrable martingale?
Suppose $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ is a probability space and $X$ is an integrable random variable. Let $(\mathcal{F}n){n \geq 0}$ be a filtration. If $X_n = E[X | \mathcal{F}n]$, under what condition is $(X_n){n \geq 0}$ guaranteed to be a uniformly integrable martingale?
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space. Consider a sequence of random variables $(X_n)_{n \geq 1}$ converging in probability to a random variable $X$. Under what additional condition does this convergence imply convergence in $L^1$ (i.e., $E[|X_n - X|] \to 0$)?
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space. Consider a sequence of random variables $(X_n)_{n \geq 1}$ converging in probability to a random variable $X$. Under what additional condition does this convergence imply convergence in $L^1$ (i.e., $E[|X_n - X|] \to 0$)?
Given a standard Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ and a stopping time $T$, and defining a reflected process $\tilde{B}t$ as $\tilde{B}t = B_t \cdot 1{t < T} + (2B_T - B_t) \cdot 1{t \geq T}$, what is the most precise characterization of the relationship between the increments of $B^*$ and $\tilde{B}$ as $n \to \infty$, considering $T_n$ as an approximation of $T$?
Given a standard Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ and a stopping time $T$, and defining a reflected process $\tilde{B}t$ as $\tilde{B}t = B_t \cdot 1{t < T} + (2B_T - B_t) \cdot 1{t \geq T}$, what is the most precise characterization of the relationship between the increments of $B^*$ and $\tilde{B}$ as $n \to \infty$, considering $T_n$ as an approximation of $T$?
Considering a bounded domain $D \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ and a function $u \in C^2(D)$ satisfying Laplace's equation, which of the following statements regarding the mean value property is most accurate in the context of characterizing harmonic functions?
Considering a bounded domain $D \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ and a function $u \in C^2(D)$ satisfying Laplace's equation, which of the following statements regarding the mean value property is most accurate in the context of characterizing harmonic functions?
Let $(B_t){t \geq 0}$ be a standard Brownian motion in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and let $u: \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a harmonic function such that $E[|u(x + B_t)|] < \infty$ for any $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and $t \geq 0$. Which of the following modifications to Itô's lemma would be most pertinent in demonstrating that $(u(B_t)){t \geq 0}$ is a martingale with respect to $(F_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
Let $(B_t){t \geq 0}$ be a standard Brownian motion in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and let $u: \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a harmonic function such that $E[|u(x + B_t)|] < \infty$ for any $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and $t \geq 0$. Which of the following modifications to Itô's lemma would be most pertinent in demonstrating that $(u(B_t)){t \geq 0}$ is a martingale with respect to $(F_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
Consider a stochastic process $X_t = f(B_t)$, where $B_t$ is a standard Brownian motion and $f$ is a continuously differentiable function. Under what condition does $X_t$ qualify as a local martingale but not necessarily a true martingale?
Consider a stochastic process $X_t = f(B_t)$, where $B_t$ is a standard Brownian motion and $f$ is a continuously differentiable function. Under what condition does $X_t$ qualify as a local martingale but not necessarily a true martingale?
Let $B_t$ represent standard Brownian motion. If a functional $F[B]$ is invariant under time reversal, what profound implication does this have for characterizing the statistical properties of $B_t$ in relation to its time-reversed counterpart?
Let $B_t$ represent standard Brownian motion. If a functional $F[B]$ is invariant under time reversal, what profound implication does this have for characterizing the statistical properties of $B_t$ in relation to its time-reversed counterpart?
Suppose a stochastic process $X_t$ satisfies the stochastic differential equation $dX_t = \mu(X_t)dt + \sigma(X_t)dB_t$, where $B_t$ is a standard Brownian motion. Under what condition does the scale function $s(x)$ guarantee that $X_t$ is inaccessible from the interval $(a, b)$?
Suppose a stochastic process $X_t$ satisfies the stochastic differential equation $dX_t = \mu(X_t)dt + \sigma(X_t)dB_t$, where $B_t$ is a standard Brownian motion. Under what condition does the scale function $s(x)$ guarantee that $X_t$ is inaccessible from the interval $(a, b)$?
Given a martingale $(M_t)_{t \geq 0}$ with continuous paths and $M_0 = 0$, and defining its quadratic variation process as $\langle M \rangle_t$, what is the precise interpretation of the statement $\langle M \rangle_t = 0$ for all $t \geq 0$ almost surely?
Given a martingale $(M_t)_{t \geq 0}$ with continuous paths and $M_0 = 0$, and defining its quadratic variation process as $\langle M \rangle_t$, what is the precise interpretation of the statement $\langle M \rangle_t = 0$ for all $t \geq 0$ almost surely?
Let $X$ be a random variable representing the payoff of a derivative security at maturity $T$, and consider a risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}$. What is the economic implication of the statement that $E^{\mathbb{Q}}[X] = 0$?
Let $X$ be a random variable representing the payoff of a derivative security at maturity $T$, and consider a risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}$. What is the economic implication of the statement that $E^{\mathbb{Q}}[X] = 0$?
Given a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables $X_1, X_2, ..., X_n$ with sample mean $\bar{x}$ and $S_n = X_1 + ... + X_n$, and considering Cramér's theorem concerning large deviations, what is the significance of the Legendre transform $\psi^*(a)$ in determining the rate of decay for $P(S_n \geq an)$ where $a > \bar{x}$?
Given a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables $X_1, X_2, ..., X_n$ with sample mean $\bar{x}$ and $S_n = X_1 + ... + X_n$, and considering Cramér's theorem concerning large deviations, what is the significance of the Legendre transform $\psi^*(a)$ in determining the rate of decay for $P(S_n \geq an)$ where $a > \bar{x}$?
Suppose $b_n = -\log P(S_n \geq an)$ forms a sub-additive sequence, where $S_n$ is the sum of $n$ independent and identically distributed random variables. According to Fekete's lemma, what can be rigorously inferred about the asymptotic behavior of $\frac{b_n}{n}$?
Suppose $b_n = -\log P(S_n \geq an)$ forms a sub-additive sequence, where $S_n$ is the sum of $n$ independent and identically distributed random variables. According to Fekete's lemma, what can be rigorously inferred about the asymptotic behavior of $\frac{b_n}{n}$?
Consider a scenario where $P(X_1 \leq 0) = 1$ for a random variable $X_1$. Based on the provided context relating to large deviations theory, what is the precise expression for $\frac{1}{n} \log P(S_n \geq 0)$, where $S_n$ represents the sum of $n$ independent and identically distributed random variables each distributed as $X_1$?
Consider a scenario where $P(X_1 \leq 0) = 1$ for a random variable $X_1$. Based on the provided context relating to large deviations theory, what is the precise expression for $\frac{1}{n} \log P(S_n \geq 0)$, where $S_n$ represents the sum of $n$ independent and identically distributed random variables each distributed as $X_1$?
In the context of Cramér's theorem, if the moment generating function $M(\lambda) = E[e^{\lambda X_1}]$ exists for a random variable $X_1$, and $\psi(\lambda) = \log M(\lambda)$, how does the Legendre transform $\psi^*(a)$ relate to the Chernoff bound for $P(S_n \geq an)$, where $S_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i$?
In the context of Cramér's theorem, if the moment generating function $M(\lambda) = E[e^{\lambda X_1}]$ exists for a random variable $X_1$, and $\psi(\lambda) = \log M(\lambda)$, how does the Legendre transform $\psi^*(a)$ relate to the Chernoff bound for $P(S_n \geq an)$, where $S_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i$?
Consider a series of independent, identically distributed random variables and let $\psi(\lambda)$ represent the cumulant generating function. What specific optimization problem must be solved to compute the rate function $\psi^*(a)$ in Cramér's theorem, and what constraints, if any, apply to the optimization variable $\lambda$?
Consider a series of independent, identically distributed random variables and let $\psi(\lambda)$ represent the cumulant generating function. What specific optimization problem must be solved to compute the rate function $\psi^*(a)$ in Cramér's theorem, and what constraints, if any, apply to the optimization variable $\lambda$?
Given Cramér's theorem, under what precise condition concerning the relationship between $a$ and $\bar{x}$ (the mean of the i.i.d. random variables) does the large deviation principle become relevant for analyzing the tail behavior of $P(S_n \geq an)$, and why is this condition necessary?
Given Cramér's theorem, under what precise condition concerning the relationship between $a$ and $\bar{x}$ (the mean of the i.i.d. random variables) does the large deviation principle become relevant for analyzing the tail behavior of $P(S_n \geq an)$, and why is this condition necessary?
Suppose one aims to establish a lower bound on the probability $P(S_n \geq 0)$ using large deviation theory. What specific assumptions or transformations are invoked to simplify the analysis, and what critical challenge arises when $a = 0$ in applying Cramér's theorem?
Suppose one aims to establish a lower bound on the probability $P(S_n \geq 0)$ using large deviation theory. What specific assumptions or transformations are invoked to simplify the analysis, and what critical challenge arises when $a = 0$ in applying Cramér's theorem?
In the context of large deviations and Cramér's theorem, if we define $\psi(\lambda) = \log E[e^{\lambda X_1}]$ and $\psi^(a) = \sup_{\lambda \geq 0} (a\lambda - \psi(\lambda))$, how does the non-negativity of $\psi^(a)$ relate to the fundamental properties of moment generating functions and their implications for bounding probabilities?
In the context of large deviations and Cramér's theorem, if we define $\psi(\lambda) = \log E[e^{\lambda X_1}]$ and $\psi^(a) = \sup_{\lambda \geq 0} (a\lambda - \psi(\lambda))$, how does the non-negativity of $\psi^(a)$ relate to the fundamental properties of moment generating functions and their implications for bounding probabilities?
Consider a filtered probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, (\mathcal{F}t){t \geq 0}, P)$ and a stochastic process $(X_t){t \geq 0}$. Which of the following conditions is sufficient to ensure that $(X_t){t \geq 0}$ is a martingale with respect to the filtration $(\mathcal{F}t){t \geq 0}$?
Consider a filtered probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, (\mathcal{F}t){t \geq 0}, P)$ and a stochastic process $(X_t){t \geq 0}$. Which of the following conditions is sufficient to ensure that $(X_t){t \geq 0}$ is a martingale with respect to the filtration $(\mathcal{F}t){t \geq 0}$?
Let $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a standard Brownian motion. Which of the following stochastic integrals is pathwise the least regular (i.e., possesses the worst sample path properties)?
Let $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a standard Brownian motion. Which of the following stochastic integrals is pathwise the least regular (i.e., possesses the worst sample path properties)?
Suppose $(X_n){n \geq 1}$ is a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables with characteristic function $\phi(t)$. According to Cramér’s large deviation theorem, under suitable conditions, the probability $P(\sum{i=1}^{n} X_i > na)$ decays exponentially in $n$. Which of the following large deviation rate functions, $I(a)$, correctly characterizes this exponential decay?
Suppose $(X_n){n \geq 1}$ is a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables with characteristic function $\phi(t)$. According to Cramér’s large deviation theorem, under suitable conditions, the probability $P(\sum{i=1}^{n} X_i > na)$ decays exponentially in $n$. Which of the following large deviation rate functions, $I(a)$, correctly characterizes this exponential decay?
Consider a Lévy process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ with Lévy exponent $\psi(u)$. Which of the following statements is not generally true regarding the properties of $\psi(u)$?
Consider a Lévy process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ with Lévy exponent $\psi(u)$. Which of the following statements is not generally true regarding the properties of $\psi(u)$?
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables on $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$. Which of the following statements regarding conditional expectation is always true without additional assumptions?
Let $X$ and $Y$ be random variables on $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$. Which of the following statements regarding conditional expectation is always true without additional assumptions?
Let $(M_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a continuous martingale with $M_0 = 0$. Define its quadratic variation as $[M]_t$. Which of the following statements is not a direct consequence of the definition or properties of quadratic variation?
Let $(M_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a continuous martingale with $M_0 = 0$. Define its quadratic variation as $[M]_t$. Which of the following statements is not a direct consequence of the definition or properties of quadratic variation?
Consider a Poisson random measure $N(dt, dx)$ on a space $E$ with intensity measure $\lambda(dx)$. For a measurable function $f: E \to \mathbb{R}$, the integral $\int_E f(x) N(dt, dx)$ is well-defined. Under which condition is the integral $\int_E f(x) N(dt, dx)$ a martingale?
Consider a Poisson random measure $N(dt, dx)$ on a space $E$ with intensity measure $\lambda(dx)$. For a measurable function $f: E \to \mathbb{R}$, the integral $\int_E f(x) N(dt, dx)$ is well-defined. Under which condition is the integral $\int_E f(x) N(dt, dx)$ a martingale?
Suppose $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a standard Brownian motion. Let $\tau = \inf{t \geq 0 : B_t = a}$ be the hitting time of level $a > 0$. Which of the following statements regarding the strong Markov property applied to $\tau$ is generally correct?
Suppose $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is a standard Brownian motion. Let $\tau = \inf{t \geq 0 : B_t = a}$ be the hitting time of level $a > 0$. Which of the following statements regarding the strong Markov property applied to $\tau$ is generally correct?
Flashcards
Sigma-algebra
Sigma-algebra
A family of subsets of a set, closed under complement, countable unions, and containing the empty set.
Measure
Measure
A function that assigns a non-negative real number or +∞ to subsets of a set. Satisfies measure axioms (non-negativity, null empty set, countable additivity).
Filtration
Filtration
An increasing sequence of sigma-algebras, representing the information available at different points in time.
Conditional Expectation
Conditional Expectation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Martingale
Martingale
Signup and view all the flashcards
Optional Stopping
Optional Stopping
Signup and view all the flashcards
Central Limit Theorem
Central Limit Theorem
Signup and view all the flashcards
Brownian Motion
Brownian Motion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Stopping Time (T)
Stopping Time (T)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sigma-Algebra FT
Sigma-Algebra FT
Signup and view all the flashcards
Random Variable XT
Random Variable XT
Signup and view all the flashcards
Stopped Process (XnT)
Stopped Process (XnT)
Signup and view all the flashcards
T ∨ S (Max of Stopping Times)
T ∨ S (Max of Stopping Times)
Signup and view all the flashcards
T ∧ S (Min of Stopping Times)
T ∧ S (Min of Stopping Times)
Signup and view all the flashcards
FS ⊆ FT (Information Increase)
FS ⊆ FT (Information Increase)
Signup and view all the flashcards
FT when T is constant n
FT when T is constant n
Signup and view all the flashcards
Counting Measure
Counting Measure
Signup and view all the flashcards
Lebesgue Measure
Lebesgue Measure
Signup and view all the flashcards
Absolute Continuity (of Q w.r.t P)
Absolute Continuity (of Q w.r.t P)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Radon-Nikodym Derivative (dQ/dP)
Radon-Nikodym Derivative (dQ/dP)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Signup and view all the flashcards
Absolute Continuity
Absolute Continuity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Filtration Fn
Filtration Fn
Signup and view all the flashcards
Martingale (Xn)n≥0
Martingale (Xn)n≥0
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cadlag Function
Cadlag Function
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cadlag Stochastic Process
Cadlag Stochastic Process
Signup and view all the flashcards
Finite-Dimensional Distribution
Finite-Dimensional Distribution
Signup and view all the flashcards
Knowing All FDDs
Knowing All FDDs
Signup and view all the flashcards
Xt where t ∈ I
Xt where t ∈ I
Signup and view all the flashcards
Hölder Condition
Hölder Condition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Kolmogorov’s Criterion (Conclusion)
Kolmogorov’s Criterion (Conclusion)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Dyadic Numbers
Dyadic Numbers
Signup and view all the flashcards
Process Resetting
Process Resetting
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mean Value Property
Mean Value Property
Signup and view all the flashcards
Harmonic Function Martingale
Harmonic Function Martingale
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reflection Principle
Reflection Principle
Signup and view all the flashcards
Harmonic Function Condition
Harmonic Function Condition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Standard Brownian Motion
Standard Brownian Motion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Increment Convergence
Increment Convergence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reflection Principle Distribution
Reflection Principle Distribution
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sn
Sn
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sub-additive Sequence
Sub-additive Sequence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Super-multiplicative Sequence
Super-multiplicative Sequence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fekete's Lemma
Fekete's Lemma
Signup and view all the flashcards
Moment Generating Function M(λ)
Moment Generating Function M(λ)
Signup and view all the flashcards
ψ(λ)
ψ(λ)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Legendre Transform ψ*(a)
Legendre Transform ψ*(a)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cramér's Theorem
Cramér's Theorem
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Advanced Probability Overview
- Builds on foundational measure theory for advanced probability topics.
- Emphasizes tools for rigorously analyzing stochastic processes, especially Brownian motion.
- Focuses on applications where probability theory plays a crucial role.
Course Topics
- Sigma-algebras, measures, filtrations, integrals, expectation, convergence theorems, product measures, independence, and Fubini's theorem are all in this section
- Conditional expectation, including discrete and Gaussian cases, density functions, existence, uniqueness, and properties.
- Martingales and submartingales in discrete time, optional stopping, Doob's inequalities, martingale convergence theorems, and applications.
- Stochastic processes in continuous time, Kolmogorov's criterion, regularization of paths, and martingales.
- Definitions, characterizations, convergence in distribution, tightness, Prokhorov's theorem, characteristic functions, and Lévy's continuity theorem.
- Strong laws of large numbers, central limit theorem, and Cramér's theory.
- Wiener's existence theorem, scaling and symmetry properties.
- Martingales, strong Markov property, hitting times, sample paths, recurrence, transience, Dirichlet problem, and Donsker's invariance principle are all part of it.
- Construction, properties, and integrals.
- Lévy-Khinchin theorem.
Prerequisites
- Basic measure theory is helpful, especially for probability theory formulation.
- Foundational topics will be reviewed, but consulting external resources like Williams' book is advised.
Introduction to Stochastic Processes
- Stochastic processes are a core focus.
- Time is a key component, studying how things change over time.
- Initial focus is on discrete time processes.
- Introduction to martingales and their properties.
- Addresses fundamental differences due to interval topology in continuous time.
- Discusses Brownian motion, its rich structure, and connection to Laplace's equation.
Conditional Expectation
- This is a key object of study.
- Involves integrating out randomness but retaining some dependence.
Stopping Time
- Stopping time is another key object of study.
- "Niceness" requires that when the time comes, that point in time is known.
Large Deviations
- This is briefly introduced at the end of the course.
Measure Theory Review
-
σ-algebra definition
-
Measurable space definition refers to a set with a σ-algebra.
-
Defines Borel σ-algebra on a topological space.
-
Focuses on Borel σ-algebra B(R), denoted as B.
-
Measure definition: a function μ : E → [0,∞] where μ(0) = 0.
-
Measure space is defined as a measurable space with a measure.
-
Definition of measurable function between measurable spaces.
-
Notational conventions: mƐ for measurable functions E → R, mƐ+ for positive measurable functions allowing ∞
-
The function μ : mE+ → [0,∞] where μ(1A) = μ(A) exists and is unique.
-
States linearity property of the function.
Convergence and Integration
- Key properties of integrals and measurable functions are outlined
- Details monotone convergence conditions and implications.
- The integral with respect to μ is defined and used.
- Simple function definition and properties.
- Approximating functions with simple functions.
- Definition of "almost everywhere" equality, defining versions of functions.
- Provides a counterexample where monotone convergence fails without monotonicity.
- Fatou's lemma states an inequality for the measure of the limit inferior of functions.
- Integrable function definition using μ(|f|) ≤ ∞, denoted by L¹(E).
- Extends μ to L¹ and defines μ(f) using positive and negative parts of f.
- Dominated convergence theorem states conditions for μ(f) = lim μ(fn).
- Product σ-algebra definition on E1 × E2.
- Product measure: unique measure μ satisfying μ(A1 × A2) = μ1(A1)μ2(A2)
- Fubini's/Tonelli's theorem outlines conditions for iterated integrals.
Conditional Probability
-
Focuses on probability theory, assuming μ(E) = 1, and changes notation to E = Ω, Ε = F, μ = P
-
The definition of random variables (measurable functions), events (elements in F), and a realization (element w in Ω)
-
Defines conditional probability P(A | B) when P(B) > 0.
-
States how to interpret P(A | B) as P(A ∩ B) / P(B).
-
Describes scaling probability measure by P(B)
-
Conditional expectation of random variable based on the measure
-
Introduces allowing B to vary.
-
Defines Y as the sum of conditional expectations of X given disjoint events Gn.
-
Describes that process averages out X in compartments to obtin the value out of Y
-
Y is G-measurable.
-
Conditional expectation Y = E(X | G) satisfies EY1A = EX1A.
-
Theorem (Existence and uniqueness of conditional expectation)
-
Given X∈L and GcF a random variable Y is created
-
With created Y it is then showed that Y is G-measurable
-
It becomes part of the proof that Y∈L¹ and EX1A = EY14 for all AeG
-
This shows conditional expectation almost surely
-
If Y is σ(Z)-measurable, Y = h(Z) is Borel-measurable for some h
-
Definition E(X|Z=z) to allow in cases when P(Z = z) = 0
-
This gives opportunity to use the prior definitions
-
We note some immediate properties of conditional expectation
-
There are several characteristics to take into consideration
-
Clear
-
Take A = ω
-
We get L¹ almost surely
Martingales and stopping
-
Gives context with random variables that "evolve with time"
-
A sequence of G-algebras help with telling the införmation we have at time n
-
Definition (Filtration). With F being ∞, this means: Fn+1 2 Fn for all n and σ(F0, F1, ...) ⊆ F The study of stochastic processes is also done here
-
definition:(Stochastic process in discrete time).
-
Stating that this involves : A stochastic (in discrete time) is : sequence of random variables (Xn)n≥
-
Definition of adapted process
-
We say that (Xn)n≥0 is adapted (to (Fn)n≥0)
-
Martingale Definition*
-
Integrable adapted process (Xn)n≥0 is a martingale states it's: E(Xn | Fm) = Xm.
-
The same formula is applied to the sub and super martingale Important note that if (Xn)n>0 is a martingale then it’s a super-martingale and sub-martingale as a result
-
Defines a way of calculating the variables if something goes up or down Stopping time: The function(Stopping time). It is a random variable T: Ω→N>0∪{∞} such that: {t≤N}ϵFN
-
Important details: If we do want to determine if T has occurred we can do using the same information we have at time n Also if you are coming from stopping time it only has to be{t=n}ϵF,∀nn because after because : {T=n}={T≤n}∖{τ≤n−1}
Fundamental theorem and other important notes
- With every theorum to state that XT1{T<=} is FT measurable The optional stopping, also makes it all integrable (𝑋𝑇∧n)n≥0
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Covers measure theory for probability, stochastic processes, and Brownian motion analysis. Explores sigma-algebras, martingales, and convergence. Discusses stochastic processes in continuous time and tightness.