🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

Science of Psychology Past Notes PDF

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Summary

These notes cover various psychology topics such as research methodologies, vocabulary, and principles of scientific thinking. The document is suitable for undergraduate psychology students preparing for their courses.

Full Transcript

Science of Psychology 9/12/24 Thursday, September 12, 2024 11:30 AM Science Vocabulary - External validity â—‹ The degree to which a study's participants, stimuli, and procedures adequately reflect the world as it is â—‹ How applicable the study is to the real worl...

Science of Psychology 9/12/24 Thursday, September 12, 2024 11:30 AM Science Vocabulary - External validity ○ The degree to which a study's participants, stimuli, and procedures adequately reflect the world as it is ○ How applicable the study is to the real world ○ "Would it work not only for the researchers but for the general population?" - Demand characteristics ○ Cues in a study that might indicate expected or desirable behaviors in the setting ○ "Breakfast is the most important meal of the day" - idea came from a breakfast brand to promote their business (Kelloggs) ○ "Biased" ○ Research is based on what they want to promote - Double-blind study ○ Technique of assigning participants to experimental conditions while keeping both participants and researchers unaware of who is assigned to which group ○ Both are unaware of the experimental conditions - Single-blind study ○ Participant is unaware of the experimental conditions being done to them ○ Experimental manipulation ○ Unaware of the hypothesis/what the experiment is for ○ Given a vague idea ○ Example: placebo medicine experiment 6 Principles of Scientific Thinking 1. Rule-out Rival Hypothesis ○ Have alternative explanations excluded ○ Make sure you are able to rule out any other potential explanations to avoid confusion ○ Multiple choice exam, you cancel out the items you want to eliminate for your hypothesis 2. Correlation isn't Causation ○ Can we be sure that A causes B? ○ Tease apart antecedent factors ○ How to infer causation in particular studies? ○ In conducting experiments, we cannot totally conclude the cause and effect but the correlation 3. Falsifiability ○ Are there ways to show an evidence against a claim? ○ Proof, backup information/data to support the claim and convince the audience ○ If you cannot falsify a statement, then it is not scientific 4. Replicability ○ Can the results be observed again in other studies? ○ Boost the confidence of the theory ○ If it is true, then it should be observable and replicable, not only just for you but for others ○ What is researched is seen/experienced not only by you but by others as well 5. Extraordinary Claims require extraordinary evidence 6. Occam's Razor ○ Does a simpler explanation fit the data just as well? ○ The more simple the explanation, the better No inference in descriptive research, simply just describing Inference - question is given and a statement is given to infer to the question Psychological Research Methods Descriptive Methods - Goal: Describe a phenomenon ○ Observation § Naturalistic and laboratory ○ Surveys and interviews ○ Case studies - Example: Polls on political preferences and television subscription - Does not answer how and why the phenomenon occur - Descriptive methods lead to the formation of testable hypotheses Naturalistic Observation - Goal: Watching the behavior in their normal environment without control or manipulation of the environment - Advantage: Realistic picture of behavior - Disadvantage ○ Observer effect § Tendency of people to behave differently when they know they are being observed ○ Participant observation § A naturalistic observation in which the observer becomes a participant in the group being observed (to reduce observer effect) ○ Observer bias § Tendency of observers to see what they expect to see § You pay more attention/notice more what you want to see ○ Blind observers § People who do not know what the research question is (to reduce observer bias) Laboratory Experiment - Goal: Watching behavior in a laboratory setting (controlled environment; may be conducted as part of an *experiment) - Advantage ○ Control over environment and allows use of specialized equipment - Disadvantage ○ Artificial situation; may result in artificial behavior Case Study - Goal: study of one individual in great detail - Advantages ○ Tremendous amount of detail - Disadvantage ○ Cannot be applicable to others, or cannot be generalized Survey - Goal: Researchers ask a series of questions about the topic under study - Basis of statistics - Given to representative sample to infer to the target population; ability to measure a large number of covert attributes - Have to ensure that the representative sample/results are meaningful/accurate and not biased - Advantages: ○ Data from large numbers of people; study covert behaviors - Disadvantages: ○ Researchers have to ensure representative sample or the results are not meaningful; people are not always accurate (courtesy bias) Correlation - Goal: Measure of the relationship between two variables - Measures of two variables go to into a mathematical formula and produce a correlation coefficient (r), which represents: ○ Direction of the relationship (+/-) ○ Strength of the relationship (-1.0 - 1.0) ○ The closer to +1.00 or -1.00, the stronger the relationship between the variables (no correlation = 0.0; perfect correlation = -1.00 or +1.00) - Positive Correlation ○ Variables are related in the same direction § As one increases, the other increases § As one decreases, the other decreases § Ex. As more hours spent in studying, the grade is higher - Negative Correlation ○ Variables are related in opposite direction § As on increases, the other1 decreases § Ex. As more hours spent on computer games, the lower the grade - Correlation does not automatically imply causation Experiment - A deliberate manipulation of a variable to see whether corresponding changes in behavior result, allowing the determination of cause-and-effect relationships - Operational definition ○ Definition of a variable of interest that allows it to be directly measured ○ Example: aggressive play - number of novel ways on hitting - Independent variable ○ The variable in an experiment that is manipulated by the experimenter - Dependent variable ○ The variable in an experiment that represents the measurable response or behavior of the subjects in the experiment - Variable A—> Variable B - Experimental group ○ Subjects in an experiment who are subjected to the independent variable (ex. Experimental group: watch TV) - Control group ○ Subjects in an experiment who are not subjected to the independent variable and who may receive a placebo treatment (controls for confounding variables) § Ex. no group: no TV Plotting correlations: More dispersed = closer to 0 More closer to each other = closer to 1 Downward / Upward = - / + Example:

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser