Abstract Algebra MATH 212 Lecture Notes PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Mansoura University
Dr. Safi Saber
Tags
Summary
These lecture notes cover abstract algebra, specifically focusing on partitions and equivalence relations. Examples and theorems are included to illustrate the concepts. The document appears to be from a mathematics course at Mansoura University.
Full Transcript
Mathematics Department Faculty of Science Abstract Algebra MATH 212 Lecturer: Dr. Safi Saber Lecture 2 Partition and Equivalence Relation A partition of a set 𝑆 is a collection of nonempty subsets of 𝑆 such that every element of...
Mathematics Department Faculty of Science Abstract Algebra MATH 212 Lecturer: Dr. Safi Saber Lecture 2 Partition and Equivalence Relation A partition of a set 𝑆 is a collection of nonempty subsets of 𝑆 such that every element of 𝑆 is in exactly one of the subsets. That is the sets 𝑀1 , 𝑀2 , … , 𝑀𝑛 form a Partition of a set 𝑆 if 𝑀𝑖 ⊆ 𝑆, 𝑀𝑖 ∩ 𝑀𝑗 = ∅, ∀𝑖 ≠ 𝑗, 𝑆 =∪𝑛𝑖=1 𝑀𝑖. For Example: The sets 𝐴1 = 1,3,5,7,9 and 𝐴2 = *2,4,6,8,10+ form a partition of the set S =. *1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10+ Theorem (Equivalence Relations and Partitions) Let 𝑆 be a nonempty set and let ~ be an equivalence relation on S. Then ~ yields a partition of S, where the partition sets 𝑎 = *𝑥 ∈ 𝑆|𝑥~ 𝑎+. Also, each partition of 𝑆 gives rise to an equivalence relation ~ on 𝑆 where 𝑎 ~ 𝑏 if and only if 𝑎 and 𝑏 are in the same cell of the partition Example 9 Determine whether the given relation is an equivalence relation on the set. Describe the partition a rising from each equivalence relation. 𝑥𝜌𝑦 in ℝ if 𝑥 ≥ 𝑦 Solution Example 10 Determine whether the given relation is an equivalence relation on the set. Describe the partition a rising from each equivalence relation. (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 )𝜌(𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) in ℝ × ℝ if 𝑥12 + 𝑦12 = 𝑥22 + 𝑦22 Solution Example 11 Determine whether the given relation is an equivalence relation on the set. Describe the partition a rising from each equivalence relation. 𝑎 =𝑛 𝑏 in ℤ if 𝑎 = 𝑏 𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑛 or equivalently 𝑛|(𝑏 − 𝑎) Solution Definition The sets defined using the equivalence class 𝑎 ≡ 𝑏 mod 𝑛 , in the form 𝑎 = 𝑥 ∈ ℤ; 𝑥 = 𝑎 mod 𝑛 , are called the residue classes (congruence classes \ equivalence classes) modulo 𝒏 in ℤ and 𝑛 is called the modulus. In other words, ,𝑎- is the set of all integers that are congruent to a modulo 𝑚. We define the set ℤ𝑛 = ℤ/ 𝑛ℤ as the set containing all these classes (sets). So, for example, ℤ3 = ℤ/ 3ℤ = *0, 1, 2+. As we can see, ℤ𝑛 = ℤ/𝑛ℤ = *0, 1, 2, … , 𝑛 − 1+ has exactly 𝑛 elements. If 𝑚 = 3 and 𝑎 = 7, we see ,7- = *𝑥: 𝑥 ≡ 7(𝑚𝑜𝑑3)+ = *… , −5, −2,1,4,7,10,13,16,19, … +. Keeping 𝑚 = 3, we also see that 0 = 𝑥: 𝑥 ≡ 0 mod3 = … , −9, −6, −3,0,3,6,9, … ; 1 = 𝑥: 𝑥 ≡ 1 mod3 = … , −8, −5, −2,1,4,7,10, … ; ,2- = *𝑥: 𝑥 ≡ 2(mod3)+ = *… , −7, −4, −1,2,5,8,11, … +. So every integer belongs to one of the residue classes modulo 3. Note also that ,7- = ,1-, since ,7- and ,1- are both sets containing exactly the same elements; think of ,7- and ,1- as different names for the same set. (With this perspective, each residue class has infinitely many names.) Theorem 1 For 𝑚 > 0 and any integer 𝑎 we have 𝑎 = 𝑚𝑞 + 𝑎 𝑞 ∈ 𝑍. Proof 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ⇔ 𝑥 ≡ 𝑎 mod𝑚 ⇔ 𝑚 ∣ 𝑥 − 𝑎 ⇔ 𝑥 − 𝑎 = 𝑚𝑞, for some 𝑞 ∈ ℤ ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑚𝑞 + 𝑎 for some 𝑞 ∈ ℤ. So the required equation follows from the definition. Note that the definition of ,𝑎- depends on the value of 𝑚. It would be accurate to write 𝑎 𝑚 but for simplicity, we write ,𝑎- while keeping in mind that ,𝑎- in ℤ𝑛 is different from 𝑎 in ℤ𝑚. Theorem 2 For a given modulus 𝑚 > 0, we have: ,𝑎- = ,𝑏- ⇔ 𝑎 ≡ 𝑏 mod 𝑚. Proof “⇒” Assume ,𝑎- = ,𝑏-. Note that since 𝑎 ≡ 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑚 , we have 𝑎 ∈ ,𝑎-. Since ,𝑎- = ,𝑏- we have 𝑎 ∈ ,𝑏-. By definition of ,𝑏- this gives 𝑎 ≡ 𝑏 mod𝑚 , as desired. “⇐” Assume 𝑎 ≡ 𝑏(mod𝑚). We must prove that the sets ,𝑎- and ,𝑏- are equal ( 𝑎 = ,𝑏-). To do this we prove that every element of ,𝑎- is in ,𝑏- and vice-versa. ( 𝑎 ⊂ 𝑏 , and 𝑏 ⊂ ,𝑎-) Let 𝑥 ∈ ,𝑎-. Then 𝑥 ≡ 𝑎(mod𝑚). Since 𝑎 ≡ 𝑏(mod𝑚), by transitivity 𝑥 ≡ 𝑏(mod𝑚), so 𝑥 ∈ ,𝑏-. Conversely, if 𝑥 ∈ ,𝑏-, then 𝑥 ≡ 𝑏(mod𝑚). By symmetry since 𝑎 ≡ 𝑏(mod𝑚), 𝑏 ≡ 𝑎(mod𝑚), so again by transitivity 𝑥 ≡ 𝑎(mod𝑚) and 𝑥 ∈ ,𝑎-. This proves that ,𝑎- = ,𝑏-. Theorem 3 For every 𝑎 there is a unique 𝑟 such that ,𝑎- = ,𝑟- and 0 ≤ 𝑟 < 𝑚. Proof Let 𝑟 = 𝑎 mod 𝑚. Note that 𝑎 mod 𝑚 is the remainder given by the Division Algorithm when 𝑎 is divided by 𝑚, hence it is clear that 0 ≤ 𝑟 < 𝑚 and also that 𝑟 ≡ 𝑎 (mod 𝑚). Since 𝑎 ≡ 𝑟(mod 𝑚) by Theorem 2, ,𝑎- = ,𝑟-. To prove that 𝑟 is unique, suppose also 𝑎 = 𝑟 ′ , where 0 ≤ 𝑟′ < 𝑚. By Theorem 2, this implies that 𝑎 ≡ 𝑟 ′ mod 𝑚. This, together with 0 ≤ 𝑟′ < 𝑚, implies by that 𝑟 ′ = 𝑎 mod𝑚 = 𝑟. Theorem 4 Given 𝑚 > 0, there are exactly 𝑚 distinct residue classes modulo m, namely, ,0-, ,1-, ,2-, … , ,𝑚 − 1-. Proof By Theorem 3, we know that every residue class ,𝑎- is equal to one of the residue classes: ,0-, ,1-, … , ,𝑚 − 1-. So there are no residue classes not in this list. These residue classes are distinct by the uniqueness part of Theorem 3, namely if 0 ≤ 𝑟1 < 𝑚 and 0 ≤ 𝑟2 < 𝑚 and ,𝑟1 - = ,𝑟2 -, then by the uniqueness part of Theorem 3 we must have 𝑟1 = 𝑟2. We now show how to define addition and multiplication of residue classes modulo m. Definition For 𝑎 , 𝑏 ∈ ℤ𝑛 , we define ,𝑎- + ,𝑏- = ,𝑎 + 𝑏- and ,𝑎-,𝑏- = ,𝑎𝑏-. For 𝑛 = 5 we have ,2- + ,3- = ,5-, and ,2-,3- = ,6-. Note that since 5 ≡ 0(mod5) and 6 ≡ 1 mod5 , we have ,5- = ,0- and ,6- = ,1-. So we can also write 2 + 3 = 0, ,2-,3- = ,1-. Definition For 𝑚 > 0, define 𝑍𝑛 = *0,1,2, … , 𝑛 − 1+ and for 𝑎, 𝑏 ∈ ℤ𝑛 𝑎 + 𝑏 = 𝑎 + 𝑏 mod𝑚, 𝑎𝑏 = 𝑎𝑏 mod𝑚, where the addition and multiplication inside the parentheses are the usual addition and multiplication of integers; what is new in our redefinition is the practice of always reducing the result modulo m. The addition and multiplication tables for ℤ4 are here: +𝟒 𝟎 𝟏 𝟐 𝟑 ×𝟒 0 𝟏 𝟐 𝟑 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 2 3 0 3 2 1 Example Solve the congruence 272𝑥 ≡ 901(mod9). Solution Using residue classes modulo 9, this congruence is equivalent to ,272𝑥- = ,901-, which is equivalent to ,272-,𝑥- = ,901-, which is equivalent to ,2-,𝑥- = ,1-. Now we know ,𝑥- ∈ *,0-, ,1-, … , ,8-+ so by trial and error we see that 𝑥 = 5 is a solution; actually, every integer in the residue class ,5- is a solution. Exercise 1. For any 𝑚 > 0, show that if ,𝑎- ∩ ,𝑏- ≠ ∅, then ,𝑎- = ,𝑏-. 2. For any 𝑚 > 0, show that if ,𝑎- ≠ ,𝑏- then ,𝑎- ∩ ,𝑏- = ∅. 3. If 𝑝 is a prime, show that 𝑥 2 ≡ 1(𝑚𝑜𝑑 𝑝) if and only if 𝑥 ≡ −1(mod 𝑝)or 𝑥 ≡ 1(mod 𝑝). (Hint: as part of your answer, explain why 𝑥 2 ≡ 1(mod 𝑝) implies that 𝑝|(𝑥 + 1)(𝑥 − 1) and apply Euclid’s Lemma.) 2 4. Conclude that, modulo a prime 𝑝, the congruence 𝑥 = ,1- has solutions ,𝑥- = ,1- and ,𝑥- = ,−1-. 4. Find an example of a modulus 𝑚 and a residue class ,𝑎- such that 2 𝑎 = ,1- but ,𝑎- ≠ ,1- and ,𝑎- ≠ ,−1- in ℤ𝑛. 5. Solve the congruence 544𝑥 ≡ 863(mod 7). 2 6. Compute the value of 2 ∗ 7 + 5 +5 ∗ 3 in ℤ4. 7. Compute the value of 2 ∗ 7 + 5 2 +5 ∗ 3 in ℤ7. 2 8. Compute the value of 2 ∗ 7 + 5 +5 ∗ 3 in ℤ5.