Quantitative Research Methods Part I - Class 7 PDF

Document Details

RemarkableTaiga

Uploaded by RemarkableTaiga

University College Dublin

Yuna Yang

Tags

marketing research consumer behaviour brand perception quantitative methods

Summary

This presentation covers quantitative research methods for assessing consumer awareness and perception of brands. It explains how perceptual mapping can enhance strategic brand management, focusing on examples like Lululemon. The document details various techniques like recall studies, recognition measures, and explores consumer understanding from an attribute perspective.

Full Transcript

d HOUSEKEEPING 01 Mid-term exam • • • • 02 November 1 (Tue), in-class, 9:45 am – 10:45 am Paper and pencil, closed-book exam • Bring a pencil or pen for yourself! In case of any issues, email me ([email protected]) Check sample questions on Brightspace Brand audit report • • Please check Append...

d HOUSEKEEPING 01 Mid-term exam • • • • 02 November 1 (Tue), in-class, 9:45 am – 10:45 am Paper and pencil, closed-book exam • Bring a pencil or pen for yourself! In case of any issues, email me ([email protected]) Check sample questions on Brightspace Brand audit report • • Please check Appendix A on syllabus Final report: 10 pages double-spaced, 12-point, Times New Roman, references/exhibits/appendices will not count toward the page limit CLASS 7-1 QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS PART I f Learning objectives # Outline quantitative research methods to assess consumer awareness and perception of a brand # Explain how perceptual mapping can help strategic brand management QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH TECHNIQUES § Use numerical rating scales from which researchers can draw numerical representations and summaries § Awareness: Do customers recall or recognize our brand? § Is out brand included in target consumers’ consideration set? § Can our target consumers recognize our brand in marketplace? § Image: How is our brand perceived by customers? § Is consumer perception of our brand (i.e., core associations; PoPs, PoDs) consistent with our positioning? § How positive is consumer attitude toward our brand? OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH METHODS Qualitative methods Quantitative methods § Free association § Projective techniques § Ethnography, Netnography § § § § § § § Survey, Experiment Social media monitoring Text analysis I: Topic modeling Text analysis II: Sentiment analysis Neural research Eye tracking Facial electromyography BRAND AWARENESS Review § Recall § The likelihood that a brand or elements of a brand will come to mind, given a related cue (e.g., usage context, product category) § Is our brand included in consumers’ consideration set? § Recognition § The ease of identifying a brand under different circumstances, based on any of the brand elements § Which brand element is an important identifier? RECALL MEASURES § Recall measures usually provide cues to help recall § Product category, attributes/benefits, usage contexts (likely PoPs) § Examples § When it comes to athleisure product category, what brands come to your mind? List them as they come to your mind, as many as possible. § Caveat § Do not give examples (e.g., Lululemon, Athleta, Gymshark, Adidas) as salience of some brands impairs recall of other brands RECALL MEASURES Assessment § You want your brand to be mentioned as early as possible § Only the first three/four brands are included in the consideration set § And the first brand recalled is most likely to be purchased § Sample results Brand % mentioned the first Non-target Target segment so far Adidas 35% 50% 20% Athleta 20% 20% 20% Lululemon 10% 3% 50% RECOGNITION MEASURES Option 1: yes or no § Do you recognize the product below? O O Yes No RECOGNITION MEASURES Option 2: yes or no with degraded images § Do you recognize the product below? O O Yes No RECOGNITION MEASURES Option 3: decoys § Which one is the original Cadbury Silk Chocolate? RECOGNITION MEASURES Option 3: decoys § Implications for packaging § Original 25% Identifies cues or reminders necessary for consumers to retrieve the brand from memory § Examples § 10% Brand logo design is important: People remember font (25% vs. 10%) § Package color is not important: People do not remember color (25% vs. 20%) 20% RECOGNITION MEASURES Option 4: eye-tracking § Measures the angle, speed, and location at which the package or ad can be identified § Copy visibility and legibility BRAND IMAGE Review § Concepts associated with a brand in brand knowledge § Points-of-parity (PoP) & points-of-difference (POD) associations § Positioning: performance- and imagery-related attributes and benefits about a brand § Affective evaluation: positive or negative feelings about a brand POSITIONING Example : lululemon PRODUCT § § § § Product: everything for athletic activities (A) Superior quality & technology (e.g., Mirror, patented fabric) (A) Fashionable design (A) Community-based (e.g., plus-size, environment) (C) PRICE § § Premium price range (A) Minimum discounting with environment-related excuse (A), (C) CHANNEL § § Primarily direct channels: company-operated stores (offline), direct to consumers (online) (A), (B), (C) Indirect channels (e.g., wholesale, studios), (B), (C) PROMOTION § § § Grassroots: Community-based marketing (e.g., in-store yoga class, local events, Mirror, sustainability, inclusiveness, global and store ambassadors), (C) Experiential marketing (e.g., experiential store, Mirror) (B) Provider of Canadian Olympics team’s uniform (A) POPs & POPs A. Athleisure Brand (athletic = performance, quality / leisure = fashionable) B. Experiential C. Community-based POSITIONING Lululemon is an athleisure brand that builds and maintains meaningful connections with others (i.e., community) by facilitating sweat and growth (i.e., experience) POSITIONING Perception measures § PoPs & PoDs § How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the statements below about § High quality Lululemon brand? § Fashionable design § (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree) § Experiential § Lululemon products are high in quality. § Community-based § Lululemon products are fashionable. § Lululemon helps me reach my health goals through exercise. § Lululemon helps me stay in touch with others who have same values and health goals. POSITIONING = CONSUMER PERCEPTION? Sample results § How can we interpret the following results? § High quality (average = 6.2) Ø Consistent with positioning, high quality § Fashionable design (average = 5.8) Ø Consistent with positioning, fashionable § Experiential (average = 5.5) Ø Consistent with positioning, experiential § Community-based (average = 3.0) Ø Inconsistent with positioning § Compare each factor (e.g., quality) with the scale midpoint (in this case, 4) ideally using one-sample t-test community-based experiential strongly disagree 1 2 3 4 5 strongly agree 6 7 POSITIONING = CONSUMER PERCEPTION? Compared to the biggest competitor § Ask the same questions about your brand & competitor § Ath High quality (average = 5.3) § Lulu High quality (average = 6.2) § Lulu Fashionable design (average = 5.8) § § Lulu Experiential (average = 5.5) § Ath Experiential (average = 4.3) § Lulu Community-based (average = 5.0) § Ath Community-based (average = 2.3) Ath Fashionable design (average = 6.0) § Compare each factor (e.g., quality) between brands ideally using independent-sample/paired t-tests experiential: athleta experiential: lululemon strongly disagree 1 2 3 4 5 strongly agree 6 7 POSITIONING = CONSUMER PERCEPTION? assessment § For the audit report, for 1-5 (1-7) scale, mean differences in excess of 0.3 (0.5) CLASS 7-2 QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS PART II PERCEPTUAL MAP Overall similarity method (1/3) § Example: Lululemon, Athleta, Adidas, Nike § Ask participants to make judgments about the overall similarity of pairs of items § (1 = very different from each other, 7 = very similar to each other) § (4x3)/2 = 6 pairs § Rank similarity (1 = most similar pair, 6 = least similar pair) PERCEPTUAL MAP Overall similarity method (2/3) Lululemon Lululemon Athleta Nike Victoria -- Athleta Nike Victoria 1 5 2 -- 4 3 -- 6 -- § Submit the similarity matrix to Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) § MDS draws a two-dimensional map such that the distance between the brans match up the similarity ratings PERCEPTUAL MAP Overall similarity method (3/3) § Lululemon is perceived most similarly to Athleta (on both dimensions) § Lululemon, Victoria, and Athleta are perceived similarly on dimension 1 § We need to give names to the two dimensions ourselves: Perceptual map – always justify dimensions (axes) § Lululemon needs to understand why it is not differentiated from Athleta PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (1/8) § What if there are many factors (i.e., associations) that differentiate your brand from others? § Example: You want to know how 6 burger franchises are perceived differently. So you came up with 15 attributes that consumers seem to care about. § How to plot them meaningfully on a two-dimensional space? PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (2/8) § Supermacs For each brand, measure the following (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree) § Offer healthy food § Has clean toilets § Has quality service § Has pleasant décor § McDonalds § Burger King § Offers good variety § Is a place to take kids § Johnny Rockets § Has a nice atmosphere § Is clean § Wowburger § Is a fun place § Offers tasty food § Five Guys § Has good food quality § Has convenient locations § Has a number of outlets § Restaurant is large in size § Has an affordable price PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (3/8) § Step 1: Check correlations among attributes Positive Negative Zero correlation correlation correlation § Pearson’s r coefficient § +1 (perfect + correlation) § +0.4 (strong + correlation) § 0 (no correlation) § -0.4 (strong – correlation) § -1 (perfect – correlation) PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (4/8) § Step 2: Spatial representation of correlations Positive Zero Negative correlation correlation correlation PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (5/8) § Step 3: Showing correlations using vectors Large size restaurant Convenient locations No. of outlets Is for children Healthy Food taste atmosphere Food quality PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (6/8) § Step 4: Collapse variables § Club associations that are highly correlated together F2 Large size restaurant Where you go Convenient locations No. of outlets Is for children Is it a family What you get Healthy friendly place F3 Food taste atmosphere Food quality there to eat F1 PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (7/8) § Step 4: Collapse variables § Club associations that are highly correlated together § Now we have three dimensions (F1, F2, and F3) § Factor analysis ouptput plots the brands on these three axes. PERCEPTUAL MAP Attribute rating method (8/8) § Step 5: Plot them What you get there (F2) Johhny Rockets Five Guys Burger King McDonalds Wowburger Family friendly (F3) PERCEPTUAL MAP Strategic implications § Orange juice brands A, B, & C § Brand A is not making much sales, so considers repositioning. How? § Improve taste: healthy alternative to Brand C, targeting segment 2 § Improve healthiness: tastier alternative to Brand B, targeting segment 1 AFFECTIVE EVALUATION Favorability measures (1/2) § Attitude is usually measured using multiple items § General attitude toward a brand § 1 = very bad, 7 = very good § Willingness to recommend § 1 = not at all willing to recommend, 7 = definitely would like to recommend § Willingness to purchase § 1 = I would not purchase this product, 7 = I would purchase this product § 1 = 0$, 10 = 100$ AFFECTIVE EVALUATION Favorability measures (2/2) AFFECTIVE EVALUATION Survey measures explicit attitude § Explicit Attitude § Require effort for retrieval § Operate in a conscious, deliberate, and controlled mode § Self-report (e.g., take as much time wanted to indicate attitude) § Implicit Attitude § Effortlessly activated on exposure to the object; more accessible § Better predictor of behavior, Related to stereotype § Immediate report (e.g., indicate within five seconds), Physiological AFFECTIVE EVALUATION How to measure implicit attitude § Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures the strength of associations between concepts and evaluations of them in ways that people cannot correct consciously or lie § Reliable way to measure stereotypes § Measured by the latency of indicating positivity & negativity (i.e., how easily the pair of a concept & evaluation is processed) § Try it out yourself: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html AFFECTIVE EVALUATION Neural research § Study how the brain responds to marketing stimuli, including brand elements and promotion materials § Measure the type of emotional response when presented with marketing stimuli § Electroencephalogram (EEG) § Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) § Labor intensive HOW TO RUN A SURVEY § Step 1: Prepare survey material § Survey tools like Qualtrics, Google forms § Include awareness & image measures § Include demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, income level) so that you can test consumer perception toward your brand based on such factors § Do not collect personal identifiers (e.g., name, social security no.) HOW TO RUN A SURVEY § Step 2: Recruit participants § Who are the brand’s target consumers? (e.g., anyone? Irish? American?) § Survey platforms: Prolific, CloudResearch, etc. § Set your participant background (e.g., geographic location) HOW TO RUN A SURVEY § Step 3: Download data and analyze them § Awareness: Is the brand well recalled or recognized? (see the %) § § Depending on the demographic variables (e.g., income level) Image § Positioning: Use t-test, factor analysis, multidimensional scaling and see whether consumer perception of the brand is consistent or inconsistent with the (ideal) positioning extracted from marketing programs § Liking: overall mean, should be high in potential consumer segment d NEXT CLASS 01 Brand Extension 02 Mid-term Exam (9:45am – 10:45am)

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser