Exam Notes - Responding to Market Failures PDF
Document Details

Uploaded by BriskFactorial
Tags
Summary
These are exam notes on responding to market failures, covering economic and social ideals. The document lists various types of market failures and their potential causes. It also discusses aspects of deviations and examples of scenarios in different contexts.
Full Transcript
Exam Notes Responding to Market Failures - A well functioning market creates jobs, increases wealth, promotes innovation amd raises the general standard of living - Market failure → not functioning in a way that is socially optimal - This can be from deviations from two types of id...
Exam Notes Responding to Market Failures - A well functioning market creates jobs, increases wealth, promotes innovation amd raises the general standard of living - Market failure → not functioning in a way that is socially optimal - This can be from deviations from two types of ideals: - Deviations from an economic ideal (economically inefficient markets) - Deviations from a social ideal (socially undesirable results) Deviations from an Economic Ideal - An efficient market causes an allocation where no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off - Markets are efficient when certain things hold: - Complete information - Perfect competition (many sellers, many buyers) - Contestable markets (no entry barriers) - Undifferentiated goods - Clear and extensive property rights - An effective mechanism for enforcing those rights - No transaction, search or switching costs - Four categories of market failure are: - Insufficient competition - In the absence of enough competitive pressure, sellers are likely to overprice and underproduce (e.g. protected monopolies) - Can manifest in 3 ways - (1) small amount of sellers offering comparable products - (2) high number of barriers keeping new sellers out - (3) high search or switching costs for customers - Information deficiencies - Information asymmetry → when one part knows more than the other - When this exists, the informed party can take advantage of the situation to negatively affect trade for the less-informed party - Joint uncertainties can lead to the following: - Trades that do not create value - Expected benefits may not be realised - Unexpected harms may arise - Externalities - Transactions between sellers and buyers can affect 3rd parties - Business activities create costs and benefits that do not affect them - These are externalities - both negative and positive are problematic - Negative externalities → leads to overproduction and underpricing of goods causing the externality - Positive externalities → leads to underproduction and overpricing of goods causing the externality - Can be solved with clear property rights and a low cost mechanism for negotiating over these externalities - Public goods (extreme positive externality) - 2 main characteristics - Non-excludable → those who have not paid cannot be excluded from their use → susceptible to free riders - Non-rivalry → one person’s enjoyment does not affect or lower someone else’s ability to enjoy - E.g. national defense - Schools are an example of a mix of private and public goods - Principal-agent conflicts - Transactions are carried out by agents on behalf of principals - They are unlikely to act only on behalf of their principals - There is always incentive to pursue your own interests above others’ - Measures to combat this include monitoring practices such as: - Implementing a board of directors for corporate management - Implementing auditors in CFR - Implementing financial press for financial analysts Deviations from a Social Ideal - Social ideals differ from society to society → not a comprehensive set of ideals - Four general categories: - Morally Objectionable Exchange - Most societies don’t allow markets for some goods and restrict markets for others based on morality - Societies may suspect that people doing these are likely to be making uninformed decisions or that they create unacceptable negative externalities - Appeal to the moral offense of these markets - Differs greatly from economic theory → clashes with definitions of individual and social welfare - Socially Important Goods - Some are given by government while others are produced privately but subsidised publicly - E.g. fire protection, libraries, pensions, workers insurance, healthcare - Markets left to their own may not produce enough and may not distribute these goods - Supporters of these goods appeal to notions of decency and humanity - Procedural Fairness - As long as market participants voluntarily trade what they own, it is fair - Distributive Justice - Markets may reward effort, integrity and commitment but they do so unevenly Responses to Market Failures Search for Market-Based Solutions - Let businesses search for innovative market-based solutions (societies are dynamic) - Can decrease economic inefficiencies or enhance social objectives - When the innovations can be turned into competitive advantages, they can be pursued on their own - When threatened by less enlightened competitors, industry self-regulation and policing may help assure stability - When they work → voluntary, efficient, a degree of stability, low cost to the public - Allows business leaders to improve social outcomes while making profit, honoring shareholders - May take time Rely on the Government - Positioned to improve situation through legislative, enforcement and taxing powers - What they can do: - Break up monopolies and prevent anti competition mergers - Require product testing and disclosure - ‘Lemon laws’ can protect consumers from uninformed decisions when sellers do not offer enough guarantees - Reduce negative externalities can be reduced through regulation and fines - Reward positive externalities through tax rebates - Public + socially important goods can be funded and made accessible to everyone - Equal opportunity can be encouraged through anti discrimination laws and affirmative action mandates - Wealth can be rdistributed through taxes and public welfare - Governments can fail and some can be failed states → can even do more harm than good - Markets are more global now but laws stop at national borders - Governments lag behind innovations → damaging in an era of fast changes Work Through the Social Sector - More innovative and flexible than government - Do not have the same financial obligations as businesses → usually take a non-profit form which creates credibility and trust - Using donations and government funding, they: - Provide market-relevant information and product testing - Combat negative externalities - Deliver public and social-important goods - Serve as a channel to redistribuet wealth - Advocate for those harmed by market failures - Prone to inefficiencies → performance evaluation is ahrd which makes it hard to allocate resources Create Cross-Sector Partnerships - Some creative responses attempt to pull together strength from eahc of the 3 sectors - Not easy to do → must take into account political environment and the differnt interests, constituents, capabilities, cultures, biases and weaknesses of each party The Role of Business Leaders - Must consider whether and how their firms resources can be properly used Make Your Money, Pay Your Taxes, Obey the Law - Rationale is that business leaders have specific and narrow job responsibilities - Let elected officials decided whether markets need to be regulated - If a business person find a good solution, ut can be pursued but otherwise just focus on business - Lack of evidence that the government and the social sector can respond effectively t certain market failures without help from businesses - Could increase the risk of ineffective action Provide Input, Expertise, Resources and/or Leadership - Right type of involvement varies from issue to issue - Option One: provide information and expert opinion to the public policy process - Can do this with minimal cost - Offer knowledge of markets to help decision makers in the other sectors to design intervention and recognise costs and risks - Option Two: take a more active role - Can represent their frims in industry associations or public private partnerships Choose Your Path Leadership, Social Capital, and Incentives Promote Successful Fisheries Authors: Nicolás L. Gutiérrez, Ray Hilborn, Omar Defeo Importance of Fisheries & Overexploitation - 1 billion people rely on seafood as a primary protein source. - 25% of the world’s animal protein comes from fisheries. - One-third of fish stocks are overexploited or depleted. Community-Based Co-Management as a Solution - Co-management involves fishers, managers, and scientists working together. - Benefits: - Encourages responsible fishing. - Uses local knowledge for better management. - Peer pressure enhances regulation compliance. - Provides better monitoring and enforcement. - Few attempts made to synthesize case studies into a general comanagement model Study of 130 Co-Managed Fisheries Across 44 Countries - Variables analyzed included social, ecological, and economic success. - Identified 19 key co-management attributes (e.g., leadership, social cohesion, quotas, protected areas). - Success was highest when at least 8 attributes were present. Key Factors for Success - Leadership → Presence of strong, respected local leaders was the most significant factor. - Social Cohesion → Trust, communication, and networked communities helped sustain fisheries. - Incentives & Regulations - Catch shares (individual or community quotas) reduced overfishing. - Protected areas contributed to conservation efforts. - Long-term management policies strengthened sustainability. - Enforcement Mechanisms: Countries with strong governance had higher success rates. Challenges & Observations - Fisheries in high HDI (Human Development Index) countries were more successful than in low HDI regions. - Industrial fisheries scored higher than artisanal ones due to better enforcement. - Multi-species fisheries faced unique challenges due to mismatched stock mobility and management areas. Implications & Recommendations - Co-management is essential for sustainable fisheries. - Policies should focus on building leadership and social capital, not just imposing regulations. - Spatial considerations and local market control improve outcomes. - More interdisciplinary research is needed to compare co-management with top-down approaches. The Struggle to Govern the Commons Authors: Thomas Dietz, Elinor Ostrom, Paul C. Stern Challenges in Governing Commons - Common-pool resources face threats from population growth, increased resource demand, and inadequate governance - Effective governance systems must evolve continuously to address changing ecological and social conditions. Factors for Success - Effective commons governance relies on monitoring resource use, moderate rates of social and ecological change, and strong social capital with trust and communication - The exclusion of outsiders and rule enforcement at low costs are critical. Global Governance Examples - Success stories like the Montreal Protocol (ozone layer protection) highlight the potential of multi-level governance. - However, failures like the collapse of the northern cod fishery in Canada underline the importance of integrating local knowledge and robust monitoring. Adaptive Governance - Adaptive systems with mechanisms for conflict resolution, rule compliance, and infrastructure development are crucial. - Nested, multi-layer governance is necessary for addressing complex, large-scale environmental challenges. Recommendations for Governance - Governance must involve analytic deliberation among stakeholders, employ diverse institutional types, and adapt to changing conditions. - Institutions should blend top-down and community-based approaches for resilience. Audacious Philanthropy – Study Notes - Audacious philanthropy is about solving big, bold problems rather than just addressing symptoms. - Requires catalytic funding, cross-sector collaboration, and continuous learning - Focuses on scaling impact to drive lasting, transformative change. Five Elements of Audacious Philanthropy To achieve large-scale change, successful philanthropists consistently exhibit these five key elements: - Commit to a Big, Hairy, Audacious Goal (BHAG) - Define a clear, ambitious goal with measurable outcomes - Success stories often involve a moonshot mentality, where organizations rally around a singular, bold mission - Example: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative, launched with the goal of eliminating polio worldwide. - Drive Demand, Don’t Just Supply It - Strategic philanthropy doesn’t just fund programs; it creates demand for change. - Uses public engagement, advocacy, and policy influence to shift perceptions and behaviors. - Example: Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) successfully changed social norms and laws around drunk driving. - Fuel a Movement by Empowering Others - Large-scale change isn’t achieved alone—it requires mobilizing networks and engaging communities. - Effective philanthropy leverages grassroots activism, local leaders, and public-private partnerships. - Example: The anti-smoking movement led to tobacco taxes, advertising bans, and health campaigns. - Forge Nontraditional Partnerships - Audacious change requires collaboration across governments, businesses, NGOs, and communities. - Blending funding models, data-sharing, and cross-sector expertise enhances impact. - Example: The Green Revolution, which involved scientists, governments, and private industry to transform agriculture. - Learn and Adapt as You Go - Iteration and continuous improvement are crucial in solving complex problems. - Philanthropy must be data-driven, flexible, and open to course corrections. - Example: The fight against malaria has evolved from bed nets and insecticides to vaccine development based on scientific learning. Strategies for Achieving Large-Scale Change The five elements of audacious philanthropy are applied through strategic approaches such as: - Influencing Policy & Changing Systems - Sustainable change often requires policy shifts and government buy-in. - Philanthropists must engage in advocacy, litigation, and legislative reform. - Example: The U.S. marriage equality movement, where philanthropy funded legal battles, public awareness campaigns, and policy lobbying. - Harnessing Market Forces for Impact - Rather than relying on grants alone, successful philanthropists use market-based solutions to drive progress. - Strategies include impact investing, social enterprises, and financial incentives. - Example: Microfinance institutions like Grameen Bank, which provide small loans to entrepreneurs in developing countries. - Mobilizing Public Will & Social Movements - Narrative change and community engagement are key to sustaining momentum. - Successful efforts ignite grassroots participation, shift cultural attitudes, and create a sense of urgency. - Example: The global climate movement, which has mobilized millions through youth activism, legal action, and policy advocacy. - Using Data & Evidence to Improve Outcomes - Data-informed decision-making ensures that philanthropy is effective and scalable. - Randomized control trials, impact metrics, and real-time feedback loops help refine strategies. - Example: The Gates Foundation’s work in global health, which prioritizes evidence-based interventions like vaccine distribution. - Taking Risks & Investing for the Long Haul - Audacious philanthropy requires patient capital, accepting short-term failures for long-term gains. - Funders must be willing to support high-risk, high-reward initiatives. - Example: The Rockefeller Foundation’s early funding of mRNA research, which later contributed to the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. Challenges in Audacious Philanthropy While large-scale change is possible, barriers exist: - Political & Bureaucratic Resistance: - Governments may resist outside intervention or policy shifts. - Measurement & Accountability: - Impact assessment is complex, requiring longitudinal studies and rigorous data analysis. - Power Dynamics & Equity Concerns: - Critics argue that some philanthropy reinforces elite influence rather than empowering communities. - Sustainability Issues: - Without long-term funding and community ownership, programs may fade after initial investments. - Know the reading and apply the readings to the cases - Make notes on the readings - How to fix market failures etc. - Don’t worry about the cases - CLOSED BOOK