UOL Y1 Public Law (House of Lords) PDF

Summary

This document covers the House of Lords, its composition, two functions, and the need for the House of Lords. It details legislative functions, executive scrutiny, and provides information on the need for the House of Lords. The document likely comes from a university-level public law course.

Full Transcript

‭78‬ CHAPTER 13:‬‭ ‭ HOUSE OF LORDS[HOL]‬ 1.‬ ‭ HOUSE OF LORDS[HOL]‬ ‭ QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE COMPOSITION, TWO FUNCTIONS‬ ‭ & THE NEED FOR HOUSE OF LORDS[HOL]?‬ ‭ EVIDENCE:‬ ‭ 1.1 Composition(doctors, lawyers and judges)‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Hereditary Pee...

‭78‬ CHAPTER 13:‬‭ ‭ HOUSE OF LORDS[HOL]‬ 1.‬ ‭ HOUSE OF LORDS[HOL]‬ ‭ QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE COMPOSITION, TWO FUNCTIONS‬ ‭ & THE NEED FOR HOUSE OF LORDS[HOL]?‬ ‭ EVIDENCE:‬ ‭ 1.1 Composition(doctors, lawyers and judges)‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Hereditary Peers‬ ‭‬ ‭ Life Peers‬ ‭‬ ‭ Lords Spiritual‬ 1.2 Two Functions‬ ‭ 1.2.1 Legislative Function(Make laws)‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Same legislative processes as HOC but‬‭ >‬ scrutiny, amend and vote to close loopholes‬ ‭ in 3rd reading‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭Consider or veto DL(Tax Credit Controversy)‬ ‭‬ ‭ Ex 1: Online Safety Bill‬ -> HOC accepted HOL’s amendments to verify‬ ‭ children’s age to access to porn‬ ‭ Ex 2: Illegal Migration Bill‬ ‭ -> HOC accepted HOL’s amendments on time‬ ‭ limits of pregnant women and children‬ ‭ detention‬ ‭ Ex 3: Child Support Bill‬ ‭ ->‬‭ ‭ /‬‭ Enforce father’s duty to support the‬ children even if the father‬‭ ‭ =‬‭ unknown‬ ‭‬ L ‭ords Amendments to Bills‬ -> Suggest or table lists of amendments‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭Lord Select Committees‬ -> Investigate public policies, laws and‬ ‭ GOVT’s activities‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Committee Work‬ -> Committees investigate issues and publish‬ ‭ reports‬ ‭ -> Make recommendations to GOVT and GOVT‬‭ ‭ /‬ respond in writing to each report‬ ‭ ‭79‬ ‭.2.2 Executive Scrutiny‬ 1 ‭‬ ‭ As a consti watchdog to monitor the GOVT by‬ pressuring the ministers to answer for their‬ ‭ work and decisions‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Oral(4) & Written(6) Questions‬ ‭‬ ‭Private Notice Questions‬ -> Ask GOVT short-notice & topical questions‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Debates‬ ->‬‭ ‭ General debates‬ (backbenchers‬‭ ‭ /‬‭ enter‬ ballot to propose general debates)‬ ‭ ->‬‭ ‭ Short debates‬ (backbenchers‬‭ ‭ /‬‭ enter ballot‬ to propose topical subjects)‬ ‭ 1.3 Need for HOL(X Anachronism -/ needed)‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭Complimentary House to HOC‬ -> Supplement and work tgth with HOC as a‬ ‭ revising chamber via amendments‬ ‭ -> Supervise the HOC’s operation and help in‬ ‭ legislative processes‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Neutrality & Objectivity‬ -> Take neutral stands as‬‭ ‭ X‬‭ affected by Party‬ Whips and politics‬ ‭ -> More open to introduce controversial‬ ‭ legislations(Abolition of Death Penalty Act)‬ ‭ as‬‭ ‭ X‬‭ elected‬ ‭‬ A‭ccess to Expertise‬ -> HOL members‬‭ ‭ =‬‭ diversified panel of experts‬ (scientists, businessmen and tech experts)‬ ‭ -> HOL members‬‭ ‭ /‬‭ make technical laws based on‬ their area of specialisation‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Direct & Straightforward Proceedings‬ ->‬‭ ‭ X‬‭ Techniques to avoid questions during‬ debates(motion closure, kangaroo & guillotine‬ ‭ -> Allow open-ended and intensive debates and‬ ‭ discussions‬ ‭ ‭80‬ CONCLUSION:‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ HOL Composition =‬‭ Hereditary Peers + Life Peers‬ + Lords Spiritual‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭Two Functions =‬‭ Legislative function + Executive‬ Scrutiny‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Need for HOL =‬‭ Complimentary House to HOC +‬ Neutrality & Objectivity + Access to expertise +‬ ‭ Direct & Straightforward Proceedings‬ ‭ 2.‬ ‭ REFORMS OF HOL‬ ‭ 2.1 Nominated & Elected Members Combination‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ 80% Nominated HOL members‬ -> Appoint members to bring specialised‬ ‭ expertise in diff fields‬ ‭ -> Free HOL from political influence and‬ ‭ pressure to be independent‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ 20% Elected HOL Members‬ -> Improve democratic legitimacy by holding‬ ‭ the members responsible to the voters‬ ‭ -> Align with public will by representing all‬ ‭ the UK countries and regions‬ ‭ 2.2 Assembly of Citizens Model‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Introduce citizens into the legislative‬ processes of HOL to become its members‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Reflect a direct and democratic lay‬ participation and promote unbiased‬ ‭ legislative views‬ ‭ 2.3 Skilled and Expertise-Based Chamber‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Only appoint diff experts in diff areas based‬ on their merits to improve the quality of HOL‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Encourage evidence-based & informed decisions‬ 2.4 Devolved Region Chamber‬ ‭ ‭‬ ‭ Select HOL members from diff devolved regions‬ ‭‬ ‭Resolve regional disparities and conflicts‬ ‭‬ ‭ Fill in the gaps between the central GOVT &‬ devolved regions‬ ‭

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser