Chapter 2: Looking Backward, Thinking Forward PDF
Document Details
![LovedIsland9844](https://quizgecko.com/images/avatars/avatar-15.webp)
Uploaded by LovedIsland9844
Tags
Related
- Laboratory Management Theories PDF
- BMSH2001 Nature and Concept of Management PDF
- Management Concepts and Organizational Behaviour PDF
- MG4031 Management Principles - Introduction to Management
- Management and Evolution of Management Theories PDF
- Chapter 2 - Business Leadership Notes (Management Theory) PDF
Summary
This document provides an overview of various management theories throughout history. It explores different schools of thought and how they've shaped our understanding of organizational challenges. From classical ideas to contemporary approaches, the theories covered show how our methods and understanding of management have developed over time.
Full Transcript
lOMoARcPSD|40186229 CH2: Looking backward, thinking forward -Why Study Dead Scholars? Progressive Insight: Scientic knowledge builds upon past discoveries ("Standing on the shoulders of giants"). Relevance of the Past: Historical works, like Machiavelli's "Il Principe,"...
lOMoARcPSD|40186229 CH2: Looking backward, thinking forward -Why Study Dead Scholars? Progressive Insight: Scientic knowledge builds upon past discoveries ("Standing on the shoulders of giants"). Relevance of the Past: Historical works, like Machiavelli's "Il Principe," remain relevant and applicable today. Repetition of Ideas: Events and ideas from history often recur, albeit with variations, highlighting enduring themes in human experience. A Historical Perspective on Management Theories -Purpose of Theories: o Theories in management provide practical frameworks for understanding and solving organizational challenges. o “Nothing as practical as a good theory” Kurt Lewin -Contextual Development: o Management theories are shaped by the era in which they develop. o They address specic contextual problems and draw on existing knowledge and skills. -Evolution and Inuence: o Historical management theories often build upon or challenge earlier ideas. o For example, Henri Fayol rened Adam Smith's division of labor concept. o The behavioral approach emerged as a counter to scientic management, reecting ongoing theoretical evolution and debate in management studies. Schools of thought: 1) Classical Ideas: Adam Smith: Enhancing productivity through specialisation Advocated division of labor during the industrial revolution to enhance productivity through specialization. (Assembly workers, cashiers) Frederick Taylor: Optimising worker productivity through process standardisation 5 Downloaded by Hong Van Do ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|40186229 Introduced scientic management to optimize worker productivity through process standardization. (oce workers, warehouse workers) Henri Fayol: Eectuating managerial functions Emphasized good management practices and organizational functions for ecient industrial production. Max Weber: Optimising the ‘human machine’ Developed bureaucracy theory focusing on rules, hierarchies, and eciency in organizational structures. (Schools) -Assessment of Classical Ideas: Pros: Eective in structuring complex organizations. Cons: Often viewed workers as mindless and neglected human factors. 2) Behavioural Approaches: Mary Parker Follett: Foregrounding humans Advocated for human-centric management, emphasizing informal processes and conict resolution. (protests, unions) Elton Mayo: Nurturing social relations Highlighted human attention and interactions to nurture social relations in workplaces. Chester Barnard: Mobilising power and morality for cooperation Emphasized cooperation and the moral aspects of organizational behavior. -Assessment of Behavioural Approaches: Pros: Focus on personal willpower and social interactions. Cons: May overlook rational structures and processes in favor of human factors. 3) Contemporary Approaches: Edwards Deming: Eectuating circles of performance improvement 6 Downloaded by Hong Van Do ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|40186229 Pioneered quality management focusing on continuous improvement and performance circles. Open Systems Perspective: Overseeing global implications of local actions Focuses on interactions within and outside organizations in unpredictable, complex business environments. Contingency Theory: Attuning actions to contingencies Adjusts actions based on factors like technology, size, and environmental complexity. Resource Dependence Theory (Pfeer and Salancik): Eectuating governance to control resources Emphasizes managing external resource dependencies. Institutional Theory: Building and adhering to institutions Studies how formal and informal institutions shape organizational behavior. Organizational Learning: Learning how to perform better Focuses on adapting and improving through experience and observation. -More salient approaches: Herbert Simon’s boundedly rational decision-making Ronald Coase’s transaction cost economics Georg Simmel’s social network analysis Edward Freeman’s stakeholder perspective -Assessment of Contemporary Approaches: Pros: Adaptability to changing environments and holistic perspectives. Cons: Complexity and potential oversights in specic organizational contexts. Some take-aways -Historical insights are surprisingly topical -Older and more recent management theories oer cumulative, complementary insights into contemporary management practices -Extant management theories are probably helpful in explaining future practices 7 Downloaded by Hong Van Do ([email protected])