Traditional Grammar PDF

1 Language Teaching Theories and Principles of Traditional Grammar Introduction Traditional grammar, rooted in classical Latin and Gree...

1 Language Teaching Theories and Principles of Traditional Grammar Introduction Traditional grammar, rooted in classical Latin and Greek, has significantly influenced language teaching for centuries. This approach focuses on the analysis of language structure, emphasizing rules and patterns. This paper will discuss the core theories and principles regarding traditional grammar and its application in language teaching. Theories of Traditional Grammar Traditional grammar is primarily based on the following theoretical underpinnings: 1. Prescriptivism: This theory advocates for a strict adherence to language rules, often dictated by grammarians or language academies. It emphasizes correct usage and discourages deviations from standard norms. Language Academies: These institutions, such as the Académie Française, were established to protect and regulate language. They prescribe rules for grammar, spelling, and pronunciation. Social Status: Traditionally, prescriptivism was often linked to social class and education. Adherence to prescribed rules was seen as a marker of sophistication and intelligence. 2. Structuralism: By examining the structure of language, traditional grammar seeks to identify patterns and regularities in grammar, syntax, and morphology. It focuses on the formal aspects of language rather than its meaning or use. Language as a System: Structuralists view language as a system of interrelated elements. By analyzing the patterns of these elements, they identify the "correct" forms and structures. Latin Influence: Much of early grammar was based on Latin, a language with a highly inflected system. Latin grammar became a model for other languages, including English, even though their structures differ significantly.  2 3. Mentalism: This theory posits that language learning involves the acquisition of mental representations of grammatical rules. Traditional grammar often assumes that learners can consciously learn and apply these rules. Conscious Learning: Traditional grammar often assumes that learners can consciously learn and apply grammatical rules. This is in contrast to modern theories that emphasize subconscious acquisition. Rule-Based Learning: Grammar textbooks typically present rules explicitly, expecting learners to memorize and apply them. Principles of Traditional Grammar 1. Part-of-speech categorization: Words are classified into categories such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs based on their grammatical function. 2. Inflectional morphology: The study of word forms and how they change to indicate grammatical relationships (e.g., tense, number, person). 3. Morpheme: Morpheme is the smallest unit of language that carries meaning or grammatical function. 4. Syntax: The analysis of sentence structure, focusing on the arrangement of words and phrases to form grammatically correct sentences. 5. Translation: Traditional grammar often involves translating between the target language and the learner's native language to explain grammatical concepts. 6. Deductive approach: Grammatical rules are presented explicitly, followed by exercises to practice their application. Historical Overview English, a West Germanic language, traces its roots back to the Indo-European language family, which also encompasses languages as diverse as Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, and the Germanic tongues. This ancestral connection is evident in shared linguistic structures and vocabulary. While English's core vocabulary is Germanic, its evolution has been significantly influenced by Latin and French, due to historical events like the Roman occupation and Norman Conquest. This rich linguistic heritage, coupled with extensive borrowing from other languages, has shaped English into a complex and adaptable language with a grammatical system that reflects its history. According to Li and Li (2015), traditional grammar is the oldest form of grammar, with roots dating back to the 15th century B.C., involving figures like Plato and Aristotle in Greece and  3 Panini in India. It gained significant influence in the 18th century as English began to be recognized as a distinct language ( Rajabi et. al., 2014). Traditional grammar refers to the study of language structure that predates modern linguistics, focusing on the formation of words and sentences without much reference to sound and meaning (Smith, 2003). Traditional grammar is a framework for analyzing language structure, and finds its roots in the study of Latin and Greek. These languages, with their intricate systems of inflection, served as models for early grammarians. As the Renaissance unfolded, the formal examination of grammar based on these classical languages gained prominence. This approach, often referred to as classical grammar, divided language into parts of speech (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.), examined inflectional patterns (word changes indicating grammatical function), and analyzed sentence structure (syntax). Over time, this framework was extended to other languages, including English. Moreover, traditional Grammar remains valuable in language teaching, particularly in school grammar, and is still considered by many to be a functional, elegant, and time-honored approach to understanding language (Azer, 1998). Period 1. Greek Period The Ancient Greeks were the pioneers in the field of investigation of language; they studied Greek exclusively and showed little interest – or none – to the other existing languages at that period. The most prominent Greek philosophers who studied it were Plato and Aristotle. Plato founded the verb and the noun and defined them while Aristotle founded the class of conjunctions. While the origins of traditional grammar are ancient, scholars like Dionysius Thrax (Greek) are often credited with laying its foundational principles. The impact of traditional grammar is undeniable. It dominated language education for centuries, shaping perceptions and analyses of language. Even contemporary linguistics, despite its critical stance, acknowledges its debt to the  4 terminology and concepts developed within this tradition (Huddleston & Pullum, 2002). Dionysius Thrax is often referred to as the "father of traditional grammar." His significance lies in his groundbreaking work, Techne Grammatike, which is considered to be the earliest extant grammar of the Greek language. Here's why he's so crucial: Pioneering grammatical analysis: Thrax's work provided a systematic framework for analyzing language, breaking it down into its core components. This approach laid the foundation for subsequent grammatical studies. Defining the parts of speech: He established the traditional classification of words into parts of speech, a system that has been influential for centuries. Influencing Western grammar: His work was widely studied and adapted, forming the basis for Latin grammar and, subsequently, the grammatical traditions of other European languages, including English. Essentially, Dionysius Thrax's Techne Grammatike served as a blueprint for the study of grammar, shaping how language has been understood and taught for millennia. His contributions are fundamental to the development of traditional grammar as we know it today. The following terms are used to categorize and describe the different types of words in Greek grammar: Nouns: ὄνομα (onoma) Verbs: ῥήμα (rhema) Adjectives: ἐπίθετον (epitheton) Adverbs: ἐπιρρήματα (epirrhemata) Prepositions: πρόθεσις (prothesis) Conjunctions: σύνδεσμος (syndesmos) Pronouns: ἀντωνυμία (antonymia) 2. Roman Period Around the same time, the Roman scholar Marcus Terentius Varro produced the 25 volumes of his De lingua latina (c. 100, About the Latin Language). Varro contrasted Latin with Greek, changed Greek grammatical terms into Latin, and formed his grammar of Latin by adapting Greek rules. For example, the Greek term "πτῶσις" (meaning "case" in grammar) was translated by Varro into the Latin word "casus." He used this term to describe how Latin nouns change their forms depending  5 on their role in a sentence, like being the subject or object. By doing this, Varro created Latin grammar rules based on Greek ideas but made them fit better with the Latin language. 3. Sanskrit Period Among the earliest studies of grammar are descriptions of Sanskrit, called vyākaraṇa. Sanskrit belongs to the Indo-European family of languages. It is one of the three earliest ancient documented languages that arose from a common root language now referred to as Proto-Indo-European. The Indian grammarian Pāṇini wrote the Aṣṭādhyāyī, a descriptive grammar of Sanskrit, sometime between the 4th and the 2nd century BCE. This work, along with some grammars of Sanskrit produced around the same time, is often considered the beginning of linguistics as a descriptive science, and consequently wouldn't be considered "traditional grammar" despite its antiquity. Although Pāṇini's work was not known in Europe until many centuries later, it is thought to have greatly influenced other grammars produced in Asia, such as the Tolkāppiyam, a Tamil grammar generally dated between the 2nd and 1st century BCE. Panini’s grammar of Sanskrit is highly systematized and technical. He defined and described the concepts of the phoneme, the morpheme and the root, which were recognized by Western linguists some two millennia later. His rules have a reputation of a scientific study — that is, they are claimed to describe Sanskrit phonology and morphology fully, without any redundancy. His sophisticated logical rules and techniques have been widely influential in ancient and modern linguistics. Besides, It was Panini who first enunciated that grammatically, Sanskrit has eight cases for the noun (nominative, accusative, genitive, dative, ablative, instrumental, vocative, and locative), three genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter), three numbers for verbs, nouns, pronouns, and adjectives (singular, dual, and plural), and three voices for the verb (active, middle, and passive). Briefly, he analyzed his sacred language and did not speculate about it. It was exhaustive, precise and coherent; we are thus in the field of linguistics. Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī was an early and influential work in Sanskrit grammar, setting a high standard for descriptive grammar. For example, Pāṇini's detailed rules for forming verb tenses and noun cases in Sanskrit helped shape later grammatical theories. Although European scholars didn't know Pāṇini’s work until much later, its impact on linguistic methods indirectly influenced the development of grammar in other languages, including English, through shared principles of linguistic analysis and structure.  6 4. Middle Ages Aelius Donatus published Ars Grammatica, or The Art of Letters, in the fourth century, and Donat Priscianus Caesariensis (Priscian) wrote Institutiones Grammaticae, or The Grammatical Foundations in the sixth century, which is the only complete surviving Latin grammar. Ars Grammatica was more of a basic guide, often used by beginners. It included simple examples to show how different parts of speech (like nouns, verbs, etc.) work in Latin sentences. For instance, Donatus might explain how a verb changes its ending depending on the action and then provide a sentence to show this in practice. While Institutiones Grammaticae was a much more detailed work, covering all aspects of Latin grammar. Priscian used a lot of examples from classical Latin literature (like works by famous authors such as Virgil and Cicero) to show how the rules were used in writing. During the Middle Ages, Modists focused on the development of grammar, bringing valuable innovation in the linguistic terminology of the particular language of technical terms. Modists conserved, and further developed the elements of the Latin grammar of Priscian, especially the categorization of words into classes such as: the division of the personal names into praenomina (pronouns), cognomina (surnames) and agnomina (nicknames). Robert H. Robins explains that Modists defined eight types of words based on earlier grammar rules: Nomen (name): Words that describe something with specific features. Verbum (verb): Words that describe actions or states, independent of physical objects. Participium (participle): Words that describe actions or states, similar to verbs but used differently. Pronomen (pronoun): Words that replace nouns without specific features. Adverbium (adverb): Words that describe how something happens, combined with other words. Coniunctio (conjunction): Words that connect other words or phrases. Praepositio (preposition): Words that show the relationship between nouns and other parts of a sentence. Iniectio (exclamation): Words that express strong feelings or emotions. These definitions helped shape the study of language in the Middle Ages. 5. Renaissance The Renaissance shifted focus to humanist philosophy and objective reality, which led to the creation of national languages and a move away from Latin. During this time, grammarians began developing descriptive grammars for new languages, comparing them to Latin, and identifying unique features of these languages. Notable works, like Port-Royal's "General and Logical Grammar," emphasized that all languages share a common underlying structure.  7 In the 17th and 18th centuries, grammarians and lexicographers produced normative dictionaries and grammars that described language rules and meanings. This period also saw advancements in phonetics, with researchers defining sounds and pronunciation more accurately. British grammarians maintained some Latin grammar systems but adapted them to new languages, categorizing words based on their functions and meanings. Also, one of the most influential grammars of the eighteenth century was Lindley Murray’s English grammar (1794), which was updated in new editions for decades. Murray’s rules helped to create modern attitudes about the existence of a correct or standard variety of English. By the early 19th century, linguists like Bernard organized linguistic studies into components such as phonetics, morphology, and syntax, laying a scientific foundation for modern linguistics. This era also saw a focus on dialects and the historical development of words. Overall, these developments provided a basis for contemporary grammar and linguistic terminology, with a blend of traditional and new ideas. 6. Modern Period In the 20th century, modern linguistics evolved significantly. Ferdinand de Saussure, a key figure, introduced a method of studying language both synchronically (as a system at a specific time) and diachronically (through historical changes). He emphasized that linguistic terms should be defined in relation to one another within a language system. Later, Noam Chomsky's generative grammar focused on language structure, syntax, and formal rules, distinguishing between competence (knowledge of language) and performance (use of language). Despite this focus on theory, there was initially less interest in developing terminology as a distinct field. However, in the latter half of the century, there was growing attention to terminology, especially in applied fields like science and technology. This period saw the rise of systematic terminology and standardized language rules, driven by industrial and technological advances. Terminology became crucial for naming and organizing knowledge, reflecting the broader societal changes. Overall, the 20th century marked a shift from descriptive and theoretical linguistics to a more applied approach, with a focus on practical language use and terminology as an essential part of communication and knowledge organization.  8 Core Components of Traditional Grammar 1. Parts of Speech: Words categorized based on function and meaning. The standard list includes nouns, pronouns, adjectives, verbs, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections. ❖ Nouns: Words that represent persons, places, things, or ideas. Examples: table, chair, student, happiness ❖ Pronouns: Words that substitute for nouns. Examples: he, she, it, they, you ❖ Adjectives: Words that describe nouns or pronouns. Examples: beautiful, tall, red, happy ❖ Verbs: Words that express actions, occurrences, or states of being. Examples: run, jump, think, is ❖ Adverbs: Words that modify verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs. Examples: quickly, very, extremely, now ❖ Prepositions: Words that show the relationship between nouns or pronouns and other words in a sentence. Examples: in, on, at, with, for ❖ Conjunctions: Words that join words, phrases, or clauses. Examples: and, but, or, because, while ❖ Interjections: Words that express strong emotion. Examples: wow, ouch, oops, hurray 2. Inflection: a fundamental aspect of grammar that allows languages to express grammatical information without altering the core meaning of a word. While English relies on inflection relatively sparingly compared to other languages, it's still a crucial component of our linguistic system. Inflectional Processes: The ways in which words are changed to indicate grammatical information. These include: A. Suffixation is the most common inflectional process in English, where affixes (specifically suffixes) are added to the end of a word to indicate grammatical information. Common Suffixes and Their Functions ❖ Noun suffixes:  9 -s or -es: Plural formation (cats, boxes) -ment: Noun formation from verbs (movement, enjoyment) -ness: Noun formation from adjectives (happiness, kindness) -tion or -sion: Noun formation from verbs (action, decision) ❖ Adjective suffixes: -er or -est: Comparative and superlative forms (bigger, biggest) -ful: Full of something (beautiful, careful) -less: Without something (careless, homeless) ❖ Verb suffixes: -ed: Past tense (walked, played) -ing: Present participle (walking, playing) -s or -es: Third person singular present tense (walks, teaches) Examples of Suffixation in Sentences ❖ The cats (plural noun) are playing in the garden. ❖ She is very happy (adjective with suffix -ness) with her new job. ❖ They are walking (verb with suffix -ing) to the park. ❖ He walked (verb with suffix -ed) home after school. B. Vowel change: While not as prevalent as in other languages, English does exhibit some vowel changes for inflection. Examples include: Examples of Vowel Change in English a. Sing, sang, sung: This illustrates vowel change to indicate tense in verbs. b. Man, men: Here, vowel change marks the plural form of the noun. c. Good, better, best: This showcases vowel change to indicate degree in adjectives (comparative and superlative forms). C. Reduplication: This process is quite rare in English but is found in other languages. It involves repeating part or all of a word for inflectional purposes. While not a common pattern in English, some dialects or slang might exhibit reduplication for emphasis or other expressive functions. Types of Reduplication ❖ Full Reduplication: The entire word is repeated. This is rare in English but common in other languages. Example: Malay "orang" (person), "orang-orang" (people) ❖ Partial Reduplication: Only part of the word is repeated, often the first syllable or consonant. Example: Tagalog "bili" (buy), "bibili" (will buy)  10 Reduplication in English While not a primary inflectional tool, English does exhibit some instances of reduplication, often for expressive or emphatic purposes rather than strict grammatical marking: ❖ Onomatopoeia: Words that imitate sounds often involve reduplication: buzz, cuckoo, giggle. ❖ Intensifiers: Reduplication can intensify meaning: big-big, tiny-tiny. ❖ Baby talk: Reduplication is common in child language: wawa (water), dada (dad). ❖ Dialects and slang: Some English dialects or slang terms use reduplication for emphasis or other expressive functions. 3. Morphemes: A morpheme is the smallest unit of language that carries meaning. ❖ Free Morphemes: These can stand alone as words. Examples include "cat," "walk," "the," and "and." ❖ Bound Morphemes: These must be attached to other morphemes. They include: Inflectional Morphemes: These modify the grammatical function of a word without changing its core meaning. Examples: "-s," "-ed," "-ing," "-er," "-est." Derivational Morphemes: These create new words or change the part of speech. Examples: "un-," "re-," "-ful," "-less," "-ly." Grammatical Categories: The Essence of Structure You've accurately listed the primary grammatical categories. Let's explore some additional points: ❖ Number: While singular and plural are common, some languages have dual or trial numbers. ❖ Person: This reflects the speaker's relationship to the person or thing being referred to. First person: I, we Second person: you Third person: he, she, it, they ❖ Tense: English primarily uses past, present, and future, but some languages have more complex tense systems. ❖ Case: Although less prominent in English, case indicates the role of a noun in a sentence. For example, in Latin and German, nouns change form to indicate subject, object, or possession.  11 ❖ Gender: While English has natural gender (based on sex), many languages have grammatical gender, where nouns are classified as masculine, feminine, or neuter regardless of their real-world gender. ❖ Mood: Indicative: states a fact or opinion. Imperative: gives a command. Subjunctive: expresses wishes, desires, or hypothetical situations. ❖ Voice: Active: the subject performs the action. Passive: the subject receives the action. ❖ Aspect: Progressive: action is ongoing. Perfect: action is completed. Interplay of Morphemes and Grammatical Categories Inflectional morphemes often mark grammatical categories. For example: ❖ -s marks plural number (cats) ❖ -ed marks past tense (walked) ❖ -ing marks progressive aspect (walking) 4. Syntax: The arrangement of words into phrases and sentences. Often visualized through diagrams. It is the grammar that governs the structure of language. While the intricacies of syntax can be complex, the core components are relatively straightforward. Key Components of Syntax ❖ Constituents: These are the building blocks of syntax. They can be single words or groups of words that function as a unit within a sentence. For example, "the big red ball" is a constituent, as is "kicked the ball." ❖ Phrase Structure: This refers to the hierarchical organization of constituents within a sentence. It involves how phrases (noun phrases, verb phrases, etc.) combine to form larger syntactic units. ❖ Noun Phrases (NPs): the big red ball ❖ Verb Phrases (VPs): kicked the ball ❖ Prepositional Phrases (PPs): in the park ❖ Adjective Phrases (APs): very happy ❖ Adverb Phrases (AdvP): quite quickly  12 ❖ Word Order: dictates the arrangement of constituents in a sentence. While English is primarily Subject-Verb-Object (SVO), variations exist: ❖ Subject-Verb-Object (SVO): The boy kicked the ball. ❖ Subject-Object-Verb (SOV): Found in languages like Japanese. ❖ Verb-Subject-Object (VSO): Found in languages like Welsh. ❖ Variations within SVO: Questions: Did the boy kick the ball? (Verb-Subject-Object) Passive voice: The ball was kicked by the boy. (Object-Verb-Subject) ❖ Grammatical Relations: These refer to the syntactic relationships between words in a sentence, such as subject, object, and verb. ❖ Subject: The doer of the action (typically a noun phrase). ❖ Object: The receiver of the action (typically a noun phrase). ❖ Verb: The action or state (typically a verb phrase). ❖ Other roles: Indirect object, complement, adverbial. Visualizing Syntax with Tree Diagrams Tree diagrams are a common tool in syntax to illustrate the hierarchical structure of sentences. They show how words and phrases are grouped together to form larger syntactic units.  13 5. Translation: The statement "Traditional grammar often involves translating between the target language and the learner's native language to explain grammatical concepts" accurately highlights a key characteristic of this approach to language teaching. Let's delve deeper into this: Core Components A. Prescriptive Approach: Traditional grammar is primarily prescriptive, meaning it dictates rules for "correct" language usage. It often relies on Latin grammar as a model, even though English and Latin have significant structural differences. B. Emphasis on Form: This approach focuses heavily on the formal aspects of language, such as parts of speech (nouns, verbs, adjectives), sentence structure, and grammatical rules. C. Translation as a Teaching Tool: A core component of traditional grammar is the use of translation to explain grammatical concepts. This involves: a. Comparing and Contrasting: The teacher compares the target language (e.g., English) with the learner's native language, highlighting similarities and differences in grammar. b. Direct Translation: Grammatical rules and structures are often explained by translating them directly from the learner's native language to the target language. c. Example Sentences: Translated example sentences are frequently used to illustrate grammatical points. Limitations of Translation in Grammar Teaching While translation can be helpful for initial concept introduction, it has limitations: ❖ False Cognates: Words that look similar in two languages but have different meanings can lead to misunderstandings. ❖ Structural Differences: Languages have different grammatical structures, making direct translation often inaccurate or misleading. ❖ Overreliance: Excessive reliance on translation can hinder the development of independent language skills and fluency. Modern Approaches In contrast to traditional grammar, modern language teaching methods often emphasize:  14 Communicative Competence: Focus on developing practical language skills for real-life communication. Inductive Learning: Learners discover grammar rules through exposure to language in context, rather than explicit teaching. Learner-Centered Approaches: Creating opportunities for learners to actively use the language. While translation still has a role in language learning, it is used more judiciously and in combination with other techniques to provide a comprehensive and effective learning experience. In essence, while translation has been a cornerstone of traditional grammar, its limitations and the evolution of language teaching methodologies have led to a more balanced approach that incorporates a variety of techniques for effective grammar instruction. 6. Deductive Approach: The deductive approach to grammar teaching is characterized by a teacher-centered model where grammatical rules are explicitly presented to students before they engage in practice activities. This method is often associated with traditional grammar instruction. Key characteristics of the deductive approach include: ❖ Rule Presentation: The teacher clearly articulates grammatical rules, often accompanied by examples. ❖ Explicit Explanation: Rules are explained in detail, focusing on form and function. ❖ Controlled Practice: Students engage in exercises designed to reinforce rule application. ❖ Teacher-Centered: The teacher is the primary source of knowledge and control in the classroom. The Deductive Approach in Relation to Traditional English Grammar The deductive approach aligns closely with the principles of traditional English grammar. This is evident in the following ways: ❖ Prescriptive Focus: Both the deductive approach and traditional grammar emphasize correct language usage, often relying on Latin grammar as a model. ❖ Form Over Function: There is a strong emphasis on the grammatical form of language, with less attention paid to communicative competence.  15 ❖ Explicit Rule Learning: Grammatical rules are presented as definitive, rather than as guidelines for language use. ❖ Translation: While not an inherent part of the deductive approach, translation is often employed in traditional grammar teaching to explain rules, which complements the deductive method. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Deductive Approach Advantages: ❖ Efficient for teaching specific grammar points. ❖ Provides a clear framework for language learning. ❖ Can be helpful for learners who prefer explicit instruction. Disadvantages: ❖ Can be demotivating for learners who prefer to discover rules independently. ❖ May not lead to automatic language use. ❖ Overemphasis on form can hinder communicative competence. Conclusion Traditional grammar, rooted in classical Latin and Greek, remains a cornerstone in language teaching, emphasizing the structural analysis of language through well-established rules and patterns. Theories such as prescriptivism, structuralism, and mentalism have guided this approach, focusing on categorizing parts of speech, inflectional morphology, and syntax. Despite the evolution of linguistic thought, traditional grammar continues to offer a valuable framework for understanding and teaching language, providing clarity and consistency in analyzing linguistic structures. Its historical significance and enduring relevance ensure that it remains an integral part of language education.  16 REFERENCES Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. Crystal, D. (2017). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Figure 2. Simple sentence’s tree diagram. (n.d.). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Simple-sentences-tree-diagram_fig1_345012692 Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. Li, J., & Li, Q. (2015). Comparative Study between Traditional Grammar and Modern Linguistics. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Radford, A. (2004). Introducing English sentence structure. Cambridge University Press. Rajabi, M., Aghaei, K., & Samuel, M. (2014). Revisiting Challenges of Traditional & Transformational Grammar in ELT: A Sign-based Approach, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Smith, A. (2003) Grammar (Traditional) for Encyclopedia of Linguistics https://aytacyavasblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/betty-azar-understandin g-and-using-english-grammar.pdf. Retrieved in May 2015. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q344124. Retrieved on July 8, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300915033_Comparative_Study_between_Traditio nal_Grammar_and_Modern_Linguistics. Retrieved in January 2015. https://cte.univ-setif2.dz/moodle/pluginfile.php/24956/mod_resource/content/1/1.%20Structuralism.p df. Retrieved in May 2017. https://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Full-Paper-TRADITIONAL-GRAMMAR- AND-THE-THEORETICAL-FLOWS-OF-TERMINOLOGY-FROM-ANTIQUITY-TO-THIS-DAY.pdf. Retrieved in January 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_grammar. Retrieved on May 16, 2024. https://lmdresources.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/traditional-grammar-the-greeks-the-alexandrian-an d-the-romans/. Retrieved on February 25, 2013. https://www.thoughtco.com/traditional-grammar-1692556#:~:text=The%20term%20traditiona l%20grammar%20refers,and%20regularly%20criticized%20by%20experts. Retrieved on August 1, 2024.  17 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit#:~:text=Sanskrit%20belongs%20to%20the%20Indo,.% 20750%E2%80%93400%20BCE). Retrieved on August 18, 2024. https://www.oxfordinternationalenglish.com/a-brief-history-of-the-english-language/. Retrieved on July 24, 2022.