SIT ERQ.pdf

ERQ Friday, 27 September 2024 15:09 ERQ Study - Tajfel, al 1971's research studies main aim was to demonstrate the minimal group...

ERQ Friday, 27 September 2024 15:09 ERQ Study - Tajfel, al 1971's research studies main aim was to demonstrate the minimal group paradigm in creating in group bias. The researchers hypothesised that when people are Introduction randomly assigned to a group – either by the flip of a coin, the drawing of a coin, or any - Social Identity Theory (SIT), developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in 1979, was method involving chance, they begin to identify with their group, noticing similar posited to understand how individuals form their social identities based on group characteristics and think of that group as their in-group and all others as an out-group, memberships - belonging in the group. forming a bond among group members, even if they did not know each other before their - SIT's central claim is that people have multiple different social selves, and derive a sense of assignment to the group. The experiment involved randomly assigning participants to who they are, in part, from the social groups they belong to, such as nationality, religion, different groups and observing how they allocated rewards. Despite the arbitrary groupings, or social affiliations like being a student. participants consistently favoured their in-group members by giving them more rewards, - This paper is supported by Park and Rothbart's (1982) study and Tajfel et. Al's 1971 demonstrating how quickly in-group bias can form even with minimal group identity. study. Participants rewarded more to their in-group members despite having no meaningful connection to the group, highlighting how minimal information can create bias. This supports the idea that people are motivated by social comparison to create a positive - The Social Identity theory explains how in-group versus out-group dynamics influence identity. unconscious behaviours of discrimination, actions of prejudice, and the formation of stereotypes True experiment that isolated independent variables to establish a strong cause-effect - Moreover, it explores how these group memberships and identifying with the group you relationship. belong to (in-group) affect inter-group conflict, suggesting that conflict arises not only - Tajfel also used researcher triangulation in this study - et. Al study, minimizing the chance of from competition over resources (as Realistic Group Conflict Theory by Muzafer Sherif researcher bias. However, the researchers posited unusual task in an artificial environment, suggests) but also from the need for self-esteem and social comparison. thus as much as it explains inter-group behaviour, the study may lack ecological validity and mundane realism. There are 3 cognitive Processes that come in forming a social identity. Tajfel's study was also reductionist, as it reduced this complex psychological phenomenon - Social Categorization, where we group people based on characteristics such as age, gender, down to a very simple level, focusing just on minimal groups and performance of a simple nationality, and religion. Individuals categorize themselves and others into “in-groups” (groups experimental task. The participants also cannot be generalized to the wider population, as they belong to) and “out-groups” (groups they do not belong to). their variability was narrowed down to boys of around the same age, and country. This helps us organize the social world. - One notable cognitive bias that emerges from this is the Out-Group Homogeneity Effect, Ethically, the researchers kept the participants identity anonymous, and information identical where people perceive members of the out-group as being more similar to each other than but left a trace of deception. The participants were told it was a study on decision making, members of the in-group when it was actually about group bias. Therefore the participants did not give their informed consent as they did not know the true aim of the study. Overall, this study clearly supported - Social Identification. SIT as the participants showed ingroup favouritism, which is an intergroup behaviour and - In this they categorize themselves in terms of the groups they belong to. This involves adopting concept of SIT. It did so in a highly standardized manner, that can easily be replicated by the values, norms, and behaviours of the group to feel a sense of belonging. As Tajfel and different researchers. Turner (1979) argue, individuals do not have a singular "self" but multiple social selves tied to different group memberships. For instance, one might identify as both African and an IB IF EVALUATING SIT student, and the interplay of these identities could lead to complex social positioning, including the possibility of feeling marginalized when conflicts arise between group values. The findings strongly support SIT, highlighting how individuals naturally categorize The process of identification is important for self-esteem, as group membership provides themselves and others, leading to in-group favouritism. This underscores the inherent human emotional support and validation. Individuals seek to belong to groups that enhance their sense tendency to seek belonging and identity within groups, which can sometimes lead to of self-worth. This idea is supported by Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, where belonging is negative consequences for those identified as out-groups. essential to psychological well-being. he quick identification with an assigned group emphasizes the ease with which social - Social Comparison explains how individuals compare their in-groups to out-groups. This identities can be created, even without prior connections, demonstrating a core part of SIT. process often leads to positive distinctiveness, where people view their in-group as superior to Participants’ behaviour reflects a desire for positive social identity, as they allocated more out-groups to enhance their self-esteem. According to the Self-Esteem Hypothesis, individuals rewards to their in-group members to enhance their perceived group status (Positive use group membership to boost their self-worth. This can lead to prejudice and discrimination, distinctiveness). This explains how people derive self-esteem not just from personal where individuals negatively judge and stereotype out-groups to elevate their own group’s achievements but also from the perceived superiority of their group status. For example, Tajfel’s Minimal Group Paradigm (1971) demonstrated that individuals exhibit in- Another study is Park and Rothbart's in (1982). This study examined the tendency for group favouritism even when group distinctions are arbitrary. individuals to perceive out-group members as more similar to each other than in-group members - out-group homogeneity effect. - As cognitive Misers we tend to make generalizations, to save cognitive energy. The out- group homogeneity effect makes generalizations and stereotyping (perception of an individual in terms of group membership) easier. In order to make a generalization, you have to create a simplified (and generalized) description of that group of people, which is simpler if you think out-group members are similar. It can explain how negative stereotypes of out- groups could be formed: we want to view out-groups as inferior in some way to boost our own self-esteem. The researchers studied 3 female sorority groups and found that women in these groups judged out-group members as being more alike, while they perceived greater diversity within their own group. This finding supports the Out-Group Homogeneity Effect, which is a key aspect of social categorization in SIT. - Park and Rothbart used questionnaires to collect data from participants. This method allows for standardized, quantifiable responses, increasing the reliability of their findings. Additionally, the study employed two researchers, reducing individual researcher bias. This methodological triangulation strengthens the credibility of their conclusions. However the study’s use of questionnaires in a controlled environment may lack ecological validity. While questionnaires allow for consistency in data collection, they may not capture the complexity of social dynamics that occur in more natural, real-world settings. Also, the participants may have exhibited demand characteristics, responding to the questionnaire in ways they thought would align with social expectations or the researchers’ hypotheses The participants were all female college students in sororities, which is a very specific social context. The study was conducted in a Western, individualistic cultural context where sorority membership plays a large role in social identity during college. This raises the question of whether the finding might apply to more diverse populations, such as males, people from different cultural or socioeconomic backgrounds, or non-college settings. Thus, the results might not hold true in groups that are less focused on group identity. Overall, this study provides insights into how stereotypes form based on cognitive processes, which can be used to inform interventions aimed at reducing bias. IF EVALUATING SIT The study supports the notion that individuals simplify complex social information to conserve cognitive resources, leading to stereotypes and generalizations about out-groups. This leads to misunderstanding and can reinforce negative stereotypes, making it harder for individuals to recognize the individuality within out-groups. The findings demonstrate how individuals can bolster their self-esteem by perceiving out- groups as inferior The out-group homogeneity effect illustrates the simplification of social identities, which can perpetuate negative stereotypes and social biases, further emphasizing the impact of social categorization in SIT. It underscores the importance of establishing communities where diverse identities can coexist and be appreciated, rather than generalized. Social Identity Theory provides a compelling explanation for how group memberships shape our identity, influence our behaviour, and contribute to intergroup conflict. Through processes of social categorization, identification, and comparison, individuals create a sense of self and seek to enhance their self-esteem by promoting their in-groups over out-groups. The theory has been supported by key studies like Tajfel’s Minimal Group Paradigm and has been applied to various social phenomena. The theory as a whole explores how basic need to belong affects social interaction, and contributes to stereotypes, conformity where there is no need for conflict. This could be applied to education, where understanding in- group bias can help educators develop strategies to promote inclusivity in classrooms. By encouraging mixed-group activities and emphasizing shared goals, educators can reduce biases and foster a sense of community among students. However, further research overall, is needed to explore the role of culture, biology, and other factors in moderating the effects of social identity on behaviour.