PTR1 (P).PDF
Document Details

Uploaded by EloquentMeadow4610
Full Transcript
⟢ GABA ᶻ 𝗓.ᐟ Introduction to Research in Physical and Occupational Therapy 3. diagnosis 4. prognosis (how long will it take for the patient to walk — What is Research?...
⟢ GABA ᶻ 𝗓.ᐟ Introduction to Research in Physical and Occupational Therapy 3. diagnosis 4. prognosis (how long will it take for the patient to walk — What is Research? again? go back to work? be independent) Portney, 2018 5. intervention (set goals, make a plan of care, designing your Clinical research is a structured process of investigating study) facts and theories and exploring connections, with the 6. outcomes purpose of improving individual and public health It proceeds in a systematic way to examine clinical or social Why do we do research? (Westerdahl, 2013; Connolly et al, 2001) conditions and outcomes, and to generate evidence for – to promote knowledge development decision making important to be more autonomous in your practice don't depend on the physiatrist in making decisions Beck & Polit, 2017 – to guide practice decisions systematic inquiry that uses discipline methods to answer – to validate OT and PT practices questions or solve problems. The ultimate goal of research – to provide evidence for the effectiveness of treatment is to develop and expand knowledge – to provide answers to therapists question — How do we come to “know” these things? — Research in the PT and OT Professions Sources of Knowledge Shirley Ryan Ability Lab tradition rehab + research ○ ‘that’s the way it has always been done’ recheck ○ practitioners have standard ways of doing things ○ limitation: short lived effects when modalities are TYPES OF RESEARCH applied 1. Basic vs applied research authority Basic ○ that’s what the experts say’ principles and theories ○ basing your knowledge on experts knowledge-driven ○ more we practice more we develop own style theory focused experience – best if you do not know a certain topic ○ ‘it’s worked for me before’ – sample topic: caregiver provided PT home programs for children ○ limitation: they’re not always right; what works for with motor delay: a scoping review (what has been written? one pt may not work for another synthesized from different types of research) ○ we have to explore other sources of knowledge Applied (action research) The Scientific Method knowledge application 1. observation problem-driven (how will this contribute to clinical practice) 2. question solution focused 3. hypothesis – sample topic: effects of a parent-administered exercise program in 4. experiment the NICU: does does matter-a randomized controlled trial 5. analysis 6. conclusion The Research Process 2. Quantitative vs Qualitative 1. identifying a problem (identifying the research question) - criterion Qualitative Quantitative check written review 2. design the study (methodology: come up plan in answering purpose to understand and to test hypothesis, look at your research question) interpret social cause and effect, make 3. implement the study interactions and predictions experiences 4. analyze the data 5. disseminate your findings objective explore, discover, describe, explain, predict construct PT Patient Management Model scientific exploratory: theory or confirmatory: hypotheses 1. examination hypothesis generation testing method 2. evaluation ⟢ GABA ᶻ 𝗓.ᐟ positive relationship does not equate from the data cause and effect subjectivity/o subjectivity is expected Objectivity is critical ○ if one value increases, does the other value not bjectivity (include biases) (readers do not know the increase? (negatives) intervention) nature of natural environment natural or controlled — Sample Correlational Questions observation conditions (intervention) do students who consume more energy drinks score higher in tests results words, imagery, stories numerical data (means, is there a relationship between energy drinks and statistical analyses) students? 3. Descriptive (quali or quanti) > Correlational (quanti) > Descriptive and Exploratory: Observe Variables Experimental (quanti) Experimental: Manipulate Variables, there are intervention Descriptive- qualitative describe populations Experimental Research (Cause and Effect) all qualitative studies are descriptive, but not all descriptive – manipulation of variables studies are qualitative – getting average scores Exploratory– observational find relationships between 2 or more variables For a research to be considered as experimental correlational research – must have key characteristics: Exploratory – experimental 1. Manipulation - intervention cause and effect 2. Control - introduces control over experimental situation; strict inclusion and exclusion criteria (qualification of Descriptive Research (describe relationships) characteristics; putting limits of duration of treatment developmental research (sequence) 3. Randomized - “equal chances of winning”: participants ○ Either cross sectional (data collection happening have equal chance of receiving intervention, minimizing once; different segments of the population) biases; if no randomization, you will put participants of ○ or longitudinal (data for a long period of time) certain characteristics in one group (those who want to normative research participate will have more participants = more results); fish ○ Requires some background in epidemiology bowl method ○ It looks at the average performance of a group ○ allow us to interpret patient scores Randomized Controlled Trial descriptive surveys ○ must have the 3 key characteristics case reports Pragmatic clinical trials ○ Exploring a novel intervention Quasi-experiments ○ done if you’re looking a novel topic (not known) ○ “Took average score before and after historical research intervention” ○ Missing control or randomization — Sample Descriptive Questions Single-Subject designs (N-of-1) up Topic: student and energy drink ○ does not mean you only have 1 participant, few how many PT students take energy drinks? participants how much do they consume per week? ○ collect data from individual participants what are the side effects of energy drink consumption? ○ rather than taking average scores of overall score for pre and post, take average of each participant Exploratory – Observational Research (find relationships) (pre and post) correlational and predictive research (diagnosis, prognosis) ○ correlational – determine if there is a relationship Ex. Effects of note taking of students in test performance between two or more variables ○ if one value increases, does the other value increase? (positive) if both increases, does not mean causality ⟢ GABA ᶻ 𝗓.ᐟ what is the process by which IDENTIFYING A RESEARCH PROBLEM what is the meaning if hat is the extent of process of research cycle: read write rinse repeat what influences or causes what difference exust between what factors contribute to Let’s Brainstorm neck pain and office workers ankle sprain stroke (cva) and adjustment to disability virtual reality and ambulation/hand function scoliosis pt and ot in PD adhd and school performance feeding behaviors of children with autism I’ve narrowed my topic - now what? So what ek determine if the problem is researchable Consider: Significance - social value as a criterion for ethical conduct of research Feasibility - consider the budget Getting Started in research critical mass - is there enough literature review of “Which question merits an answer?” the topic you are interested in? interest - public’s interest sources of research problems: intellectual curiosity How to State Research Problem serendipity – components of planning a study - finding something that you are not intentionally how you construct your research problem will determine looking for (accidental findings) your methodology of research design analysis of practice needs quality improvement Stating the research problem ○ “redesigning care for back pain” objective/statement of purpose theory ○ specific and measurable professional literature ○ verbs consistent with type of study ○ journal articles ○ break down into general and specific objectives organizer and systematic determination of research needs question hypothesis When choosing a Research Problem ○ not needed in descriptive studies what fascinates you? ○ contains IV (presumed cause) and DV (presumed keep it simple effect) who will benefit and how? ○ research and null hypothesis for experimental studies treatment: in (population), what is the effect of (IV: intervention or an alternative) on (DV)? ○ IV - independent variable (intervention) Narrowing. aresearch probles ○ DV - Dependent Variable (outcome, what is goin on with variable you want to change) ⟢ GABA ᶻ 𝗓.ᐟ In summary REFERENCES AND CITATION defining a research problem is an iterative process (back and forth) Citation your research problem must be researchable, feasible, also called in-text citation/in line citation significant to the profession, and interesting to you It appears in the body of the paper it can be stated as either an objective, question or hypothesis how your research problem is stated influences Two formats of In-text citation methodological decisions in a research project Parenthetical: Falsely balanced news coverage can distort the public's perception of expert consensus on an issue (Koehler, 2016). Narrative: Koehler (2016) noted the dangers of falsely balanced news coverage. + In 2016, Koehler noted the dangers of falsely balanced news coverage. RULES IN IN-TEXT CITATION Direct quoting Include sentence using quotations Include the page Direct quoting: (Jones, 1998, p. 199) or (Jones, 1998, pp. 199- 201) – Example: According to Jones (1998), "students often had difficulty using APA style, especially when it was their first time" (p. 199). Jones (1998) found "students often had difficulty using APA style" (p. 199); what implications does this have for teachers? Capitalizations: Proper nouns, including the author names and initials (always): D. Jones Title of the source: if >4 letters (Permanence and Change) Except for short words that are verbs, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and adverbs: Writing New Media, There Is Nothing Left to Lose. First word after a colon or dash: "Defining Film Rhetoric: The Case of Hitchcock's Vertigo." Authors: One author: (Ahmed, 2016) or As Ahmed (2016) mentions.. Two authors: Research by Wegener and Petty (1994) supports... or (Wegener & Petty, 1994) Three or more authors: (Kernis et al., 1993) or Kernis et al. (1993) suggest… ○ If there are ambiguities such as Jones, Smith, Liu, Huang, and Kim (2020) and Jones, Smith, Ruiz, Wang, and Stanton (2020)