POLI 359 Notes PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Tags
Summary
These notes cover the topic of comparative politics, including the logic of comparison, the study of comparative politics, and issues of focus in comparative politics. The notes use various examples and discuss important concepts in the discipline. The document appears to be course notes.
Full Transcript
**Topic 1 ** - The Logic of Comparison: - Comparison helps to establish understanding, explanation, order and meanings to our complex world - Root facts in isolation mean nothing - We use concepts and theories to understand this political world...
**Topic 1 ** - The Logic of Comparison: - Comparison helps to establish understanding, explanation, order and meanings to our complex world - Root facts in isolation mean nothing - We use concepts and theories to understand this political world - You can reframe old questions anew (questions pre COVID can be refocused as questions post COVID) - Comparative Politics: the systematic comparison of cases, variables and/or meanings in relation to politics and power relations - Employs systematic comparison and seeks generalizations beyond the specific - Your idea can travel to other places (e.g: concepts of colonialism, idea, time etc can all travel) - When things are said in relative terms is when we get meaning (e.g: describing someone without using relative terms is hard, height is a relative concept which has been imbued in meaning) - We want to understand HOW a causal relationship happened (Statisticians miss this) - Qualitative Understanding: you get into the nitty gritty but you are only focusing on a single case - We are interested in interpretivist type of work (e.g: what does BLM mean for civil rights in America) - This is where logic wins the game, can't really measure - The Study of Comparative Politics: - A Primary sub - field of political science - A relatively young discipline - A western centric field of study - Seeks to establish arguments around causation and/ or meaning about particular political phenomena - Demonstrating causation is the ultimate goal in Political Science - A comparative study involves: - I. Observation & question formation - Research and analysis should be pursued around a question - II\. Conceptual and theoretical formulation - What are we looking at - Don\'t just make a claim but engage in conceptualisation - Example: "What is this a case of" - A Concept is something that you are trying to capture (an idea of something), - Concepts are usually are not directly tangible - Theory is more about how things relate to other things - We are interested in finding the relation between things - Example: What does BLM mean for democracy within the Western World - Example: is this democratization, is this international law etc - we have to be very clear about our concepts (Jordan Peterson skips actual questions by opening up the conceptualisation) - III\. Methodological development - Methodology is how we go about learning what we want to know - IV\. Testing of hypothesis using the specified comparative methods - Using Theory and applying theory to the empirical world - V. Findings and thesis formulation - Questions of Comparative Politics: Asking When, Where and How? - Asking questions beyond when, where and who? - This is the easy stuff to find out - Interested in [what (identify explanatory variables or outcomes), why (try to establish some sort of causal relationships) and how (what is the meat of this relationship)] questions - Whats and Whys can be used via Quantitative Analysis but Small Single Case studies are best to answer the how questions - You want to pursue open ended questions - Example: what were the causes of the coup belt in Eastern or Central Africa - Avoid assuming answers: Pose your question as "Electoral Impact of Marijuana for the Liberals" as opposed to, "Why did marijuana laws lead to electoral success for the liberals" and keep questions open ended - Avoid leading questions - All findings are tentative (we are in the business of analysis, not faith and are ideas have to be open to potential falsification) - Comparativists focus on the bigger provocative questions - Pursue open ended questions and avoid leading questions - We have to interpret facts, they do not speak for themselves - Real comparativists focus on questions they truly are interested in - Issues of Focus in Comparative Politics: - Regime types, Government Institutions and processes, Government Policies, State - market - society - relations, Economic outcomes, Identity Politics, Ideology, Human Rights, Contentious Politics, International Relations - Ideational factors are the fastest growing area of study - Identity Politics: any politics surrounding identity - Key tools for Comparative Politics: - Concepts: Abstract Ideas use to make sense of, organize and think about our world - We do nots see concepts, we create them (constructivist) or discover them (positivist) - Conceptualisation: The process of creating a concept - Indicators: empirical features that indicate and unobservable concept - Voting every election is a indicator for democracy - Operationalisation: the process of making a concept observable through the assignment of indicators - Concepts: - Concepts range from very general to very specific - We use conceptual ladders to organize our concepts - Giovanni Satori's ladder of abstraction - This is how we organize our concepts, we start super broad and the more general, the higher order concept and the more distinctive terms given, the lower it goes (e.g: regime types, sub regimes and so and so) - We want to find a balance when creating our concepts, we do not want to be too abstract - Don\'t want to be too high where its useless and too low where its top descriptive - We want our concepts to travel beyomd 1 situation: conceptual travel - The specificity or generality of a concept determines the reach of the phenomena it is meant to represent - We want our concepts to travel but want to avoid conceptual stretching - Don\'t apply concepts that do not fit to the concepts (e.g: Left of Center people being called Communists v Right of Center people being called Fascists) - Trudeau can\'t be called a Fascist or Communist for invoking the Emergency Act - Variable: the causes/ outcomes we are trying to identify and/or measure - Synonymous with factor - Independent Variable (X): The cause - Dependent Variable (Y): The effect of outcome - Y is the result of X - We are interested in variation and similarities between causes - Variation: differences between cases - Causality: A causal relationship of 2 or more factors - Correlation: A non - causal relationshipl - If the quality of one thing goes up, the quality of another thing goes up and down - There is a correlation between ice cream sales and murder rates - But you cannot say that ice cream sales cause murder - Very rare to demonstrate causality compared to correlation - For years we assumed that increased democratization brought about economic growth - That is not the case, there is no clear causal relationship here - Further democratization has resulted in negative economic growth in some places and some autocracies are well developed - Finding causation is a holy grail but difficult - We can confuse causation with a lot of stuff - We should avoid conflating arguments (e.g: Country becomes stable with more order) - Reverse Causality: Some argue that increased economic growth is conducive to democratisation (Y actually causes X) - This is correlation in a different way - Endogeneity Problem: This is where variables cause each other (like the chicken and the egg problem) - There is a causal relationship between democratization and economic growth but we cannot ping what causes what - Intervening variable: X causes Y but that is indirect (Poorer kids score less in school) - Intervening variable was the lack of food - Omitted Variable Problem: There is a variable in the relationship but we do not know what it is (Omitted variable in the Ice cream sales and murder problem was the hotter weather; easier to kill and sell ice cream in this weather) - Necessary and Sufficient conditions - Key tools for comparative politics: - Case: a basic unit of analysis (case study analysis can be either cross case or within case) - You can have 1 case and a 100 different Observations of the case - Case is the phenomenon or directly related to the phenomenon we are dealing with - Can be a situation (e.g: need not be a country, can be a group of people or territory or city) - You can have multiple observation of a case (Can have the case of Canada in 1920 v 2024, two separate cases with multiple observation of the case) - Comparativists engage in case studies, small N studies (Single Case) and large N studies - May not be comparative but part of a comparative enterprise - Level of analysis: The level (individual, institutional, societal, international) at which observations and comparisons are made - Avoid comparing two different things/ two different levels of analysis - Example: Dont compare the Conservative Party to Trudeau - [Politics: the practices and processes of power relations] - Iron Law of Oligarchy: some form of hierarchy is to be formed in any system - **DO NOT BE DEFINITIVE** - The Diffusion Theory: happens in geographically specific regions, something spreads more quickly and effectively - The Domino Theory: What happens in one place is more likely to happen in similar circumstances in other places - We have to be very careful in how we are conceptualizing the issues we are looking at - Determining which factors are key is essential - You can be involved in the comparative enterprise even though you are not comparing in one case only (can apply it to a similar case, deviant cases etc) - Can discover a lot of concepts through a study of the Coup Belt - Coup Belt in West Africa: - Started in 2020 - Coup: Extrajudicial takeover of power (usually extra- democratic, illegal and unconstitutional) - Takeover by military or some civilian or interest group - Began in Mali, continued in other countries like Guinea, Burkina Faso etc - Counter Factualist: Comparison of one situation with a comparison of the situation if something would have happened - Example: What if Trudeau did not invoke the Emergencies Act on the Convoy in 2022 - Used by a lot of Political Scientists - **DO NOT DO COUNTERFACTUALS IN PAPERS SEEN BY MARK MACHACHEK** - We have seen a re - politicization of traditional authority in Africa - Use a single case study to see why this happened - Use the findings to compose a theory across wider concepts - Exploring a single case to find concepts - Subfields of Political Science: - Comparative Politics, Political Philosophy and International Relations - Comparative is just the study of methodology of political science