Health Promotion and Planning Exam PDF

Summary

This document covers health promotion and planning, including the Generalized Model and the Precede Proceed Model. It also discusses needs assessment, data resources, and the process of creating a program rationale, providing a framework for building healthier communities and addressing health issues.

Full Transcript

Chapter 1: - - - - - America: - - - - - Health educator VS. health promotion: Health educator: uses evidenced based practice and thepories to provide opportunities to acquire knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to adopt these health behaviors Health promotion: broad...

Chapter 1: - - - - - America: - - - - - Health educator VS. health promotion: Health educator: uses evidenced based practice and thepories to provide opportunities to acquire knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to adopt these health behaviors Health promotion: broader view, plans combination of education with politics, Environmental, Regulatory mechanisms that support actions of health Worksite wellness: Jobs found here are health educators, coaches, wellness program coordinator, and account manager Hospitals: Jobs would be behavioral health coordinator. Behavioral health consultant, behavioral health manager, behavioral health director Primary prevention: in healthy pops, keeping them healthier Secondary: symptoms or risks of disease present Tertiary: disease/illness impairing significantly In health promotion there is limitations sometime bc we have to assume things like: Health status can be changed, health is determined by these factors,. Behaviors can change Chapter 2: planning process Community tool box: this is a resource that provides step by steps guidance for those planning to build healthier communities; offers tips and tools for the planning and taking action Planning is a multistep process - - - - Preplanning: identify and engage partners- how will partners be selected and are you gonna use a top down or bottom up approach Identify and secure resources- Budget, external funds,community resources **Step 1 of planning:** **Create a rationale to gain support of decision makers** Decision makers= people who provide necessary resources and support - - Top down: when push for the program is coming from the boss or decision maker itself Bottom up: push is coming from people in community or lower down, takes a large amount of them to impact change and requires an organization **Steps to create a program rationale:** 1. - - - - - Knowing data resources during this step is important: **CDC:** national level info/data **City Health Dashboard:** city level data, comprehensive from cities of US- but can explore your city **Our world in data:** global data, can compare cross country and assess global issues **County Health Rankings;** ranks all the counties in us based on health factors **Healthy people 2030:** provides goals and aims for us health and targets improving the next decade of us health **Literature searches:** peer reviewed articles with data and studies Quality of evidence: Highest quality is things like meta analysis, systematic reviews, critical appraised Middle: controlled trials Lowest quality: case studies, cohorts, background info Cost-benefit analysis CBA: benefit received from dollars invested in program Return on Investment(ROI): ratio of costs to financial return 2. 3. 4. APA, conscience same format, shows decision makers you did your research Steps to create a program rationale: 1. 2. 3. 4. Sources: Cdc Healthy ppl 2030 County health ranking Our world in data City dashboard Literature searches Partnering means pairing with other entities to work on the project Chapter 3: Program planning models These models provide organization and frame work Go from point a to point B with value and meaning First model is the: **Generalized Model:** Steps: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. First: assessing needs - - Next: setting goals: - Developing intentions: - Implementing the intervention: - Then... Evaluate results: - - - Ok so steps of generalized model 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. When choosing a model to use as framework look at things like Fluidity: steps should build on one another Flexibility: can it adapt to needs of stakeholder(customers, employees, partners) functionality: is the outcome improving health Precede Proceed model: precede : is looking at predisposing reinforcing and enabling factors in educational ecological and evaluation First 4 phases are assessment focuses- understanding the why behind a health issue 1: social assessment/situational assessment: identify QOL issues(could be health issues, social issues) 2: epidemiological assessment : identifies specific health problem and their cause 3\) education and ecological assessment : what factors can help change this (knowledge, skills) 4\) administrative and policy assessment; intervention alignment :looks at what policies and resources are needed to support it Proceed: this part looks at policy, regulations, organizational aspects in the education and environment; This part is about the **how**. It focuses on putting the plan into action by developing the strategies, policies, and activities that will address the issues identified in PRECEDE. 1. 2. 3. 4. Precede: Phase 1: situational and social analysis -seeks to define QOL -what is the need? -What is the desired result? -best done in interview priority population with self assessment -some examples of social indicators of QOL= happiness, achievement, self efficacy Phase 2: epidemiological assessment: - - - Prioritization matrix can help find important factors that are changeable Phase 3: Educational and ecological assessment identifies factors that may influence behavior or change environment (can help change) Predisposing - knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, perceptions Enabling- barriers created in society (lack of access, availability etc.) Reinforcing- feedback and rewards after behavior changes (incentives) Phase 4: intervention alignment and administrative/policy: \- matching intervention with projected changes -Planners determine if resources are available for this program Proceed; Phase 5: implementation Implementing plans and intervention begins Phase 6: process eval: measurements of implementation to control and improve Qualitt of peorgram' Phase 7: impact evaluation: immediate observable effects of program Phase 8: long term effects of the program SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) - - - **Strengths**: These are the things a business does well or the advantages it has over others. For example, a strong brand, skilled workforce, or loyal customer base. **Weaknesses**: These are the areas where the business may be lacking or things that need improvement. For example, limited resources, poor customer service, or inefficient processes. **Opportunities**: These are external factors that the business can take advantage of. They could be new market trends, changes in customer behavior, or new technologies that can help the business grow. **Threats**: These are external challenges or risks that could negatively affect the business. For example, new competitors, economic downturns, or changes in regulations. Chapter 4: Needs assessment Needs assessment is the process of analyzing the needs of a population Crucial step in planning Why do a needs assessment? - - After finding the need of a pop: for ex could be needing to increase PA Then... -find resources for intervention What to expect from a needs assessment: - - - - - - Primary data collection: collecting data by yourself - - - - Methods of primary data collection: -written surveys Pros: wide reach, low cost, minimal time Cons: low response rate, not representative -face to face interviews Pros: high response rate, in depth data Cons: expensive, interviewer bias, time consuming -telephone interviews Pros: moderate costs, easy, wide reach Cons: not representative, interview bias -electronic interviews Pros: low cost, easy Cons: lack autonomy -group interviews Pros: high response rate, efficient Cons: data can be influenced by a dominant participant -delphi technique Pros: spans over time, equal representation, pooled responses Cons: high cost and time commitment, reduced clarification opportunity -community forum or town hall: Pros: straightforward, inexpensive, voluntary participation Cons: attendance usually low, data analysis is time consuming -meetings Pros: low cost, flexible, good for formative evaluation Cons: result bias, limited input form participants -focus groups: Pros: low cost, ease of clarification Cons: qualitative info, limited representation, dependant on moderator -nominal groups Pros: direct involvement of groups, planned interactivity Cons: time intensive, participation bias -self assessments: Pros: no interview bias, convenient, easy Cons: possible low response rate, self selection Secondary data collection: using other peoples data (like accessing data online done by someone else) Using other material as source Collected already by someone else Advantages: already exists and inexpensive disadvantages : might not identify the true needs of your pop Cross sectional surveys: - - - - - - - Ways to minimize bias on self reported data: - - - - - - - - Multipstep survey or DELPHI technique: -self report type survey -collecting primary data from same people multiple times Series of less than 5 written or electronic surveys Goal of this is to generate an overall conspicuous Process: - - - - Community forum (town hall meeting): -purpose is to inform the public -you can call and ask questions to give them a sense of concerns -process: \- mediator explains purpose and asks ppl for concerns \- recorders present -speaking time is limited -allows this Q&A Meetings: - - - - - - - Focus groups: Qualitative -used to obtain feelings,emotions, attitudes, misconceptions Process: - - - - - - - - Nominal group process -highly structured process in which few knowledgeable representatives of priority populations are asked to **qualify and quantify** specific needs Process -groups of 5-7 ppl -each person writes answer to a single question -each person shares answer -discussion -group selects and ranks importance of all the issues -may include preliminary and final voting system Observation study: Minimal contact Observing Can be direct: seeing first hand Or indirect: proxy measure Can be obtrusive: subject is aware of being observed Unobtrusive: unaware of being observed Examples of observation: -windshield tours -walk throughs -photovoice

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser