Tennis Anticipation Study PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by PrettyHyperbole
University of New Brunswick
Tags
Summary
This document details a study of tennis anticipation, focusing on how advanced players use cues to predict serves. The study explores the difference in information processing speed between intermediate and advanced players. It finds that at normal speed, advanced players have superior serve prediction accuracy; however, this difference is reduced at slower speeds, suggesting that advanced players may not have superior processing under slower conditions.
Full Transcript
Oct 31 - Anticipation Friday, November 1, 2024 10:37 AM Tennis is an example of an open-skill sport where anticipation and decision making skills are important This skill becomes even more critical at advanced levels of play where rapid decision making is required The si...
Oct 31 - Anticipation Friday, November 1, 2024 10:37 AM Tennis is an example of an open-skill sport where anticipation and decision making skills are important This skill becomes even more critical at advanced levels of play where rapid decision making is required The size of the court, speed of shot, and time needed for reaction and movement often means that unless the flight path of the shot is anticipated early, efforts to reach the ball and play an effective return will be in vain This is particularly true of serve return where tennis serves may reach speeds of over 220 km/h Athlete are in a time-pressured situation and may have less than 400 milliseconds to allow for serve identification, the type of return to be played, reaction time, and movement Players are obliged to predict the intentions of their opponents. However, this can be risky bc of the negative consequences that result when they're incorrect Anticipation in situations such as serve reception is dependent on the seeking out of advanced cues and the processing of the info that these cues contain Actual serve reception performance has demonstrated that advanced tennis players predict at a better than chance level, thereby providing indirect evidence that advance cues do possess some measure of predictive validity What is unclear is how advanced players, in comparison to novice or average players, use advanced cues effectively. There are two possibilities: - Average players may study different cues than those viewed by advanced players - Avg players may differ from advanced players in their speed of information processing Information Processing Speed Study The purpose of the study was to investigate advanced cues and their use in - Avg players may differ from advanced players in their speed of information processing Information Processing Speed Study The purpose of the study was to investigate advanced cues and their use in predicting tennis serves Hypothesized that advanced and intermediate players may have equal theoretical knowledge; however, they will differ in their ability to detect these cues under normal speed conditions (1) advanced players would predict significantly more serves than intermediate players after viewing a prediction video at normal speed (2) however, when the prediction video was replayed at a much slower speed, the difference in accuracy between the two groups would not be significant At normal replay speed, advanced players accurately predicted the type of serve at a significantly higher rate than intermediate players In other words, at normal replay speeds intermediate players performed significantly worse than advanced players At slow replay, no significant different. Intermediate players predicted serve type just as well as advanced players when it was slowed down