Lesson 1: Introduction to Logic PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Tags
Related
- Critical Thinking and Logical Reasoning PDF
- Critical Thinking and Practical Reasoning Chapter 1 & 2 PDF
- Critical Thinking and Practical Reasoning Chapters 1 & 2 PDF
- Nature of Philosophy and the Basic Concepts of Logic PDF
- IGS 1104 Introduction to Philosophy and Critical Thinking PDF
- Truth and Validity in Logic and Critical Thinking PDF
Summary
This document introduces the concept of logic as a branch of philosophy, focusing on its definition as the science and art of correct thinking and reasoning. It discusses the methods and principles used to evaluate arguments and appraise their correctness.
Full Transcript
Lesson 1: Introduction to Logic +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Logic as a Branch of | -Logic is one of the | | | Philosophy | branches of | | |...
Lesson 1: Introduction to Logic +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Logic as a Branch of | -Logic is one of the | | | Philosophy | branches of | | | | philosophy. It is | | | | considered the most | | | | fundamental because | | | | it provides a person | | | | with the rational | | | | capability to engage | | | | in a further study of | | | | philosophy. | | | | | | | | -Dating back to | | | | Aristotle, logic is | | | | one of the oldest | | | | intellectual | | | | disciplines in human | | | | history. It has been | | | | studied through the | | | | centuries. It is | | | | still a subject of | | | | active investigation | | | | today. | +=======================+=======================+=======================+ | | Meaning of Logic | -Logic is broadly | | | | defined as the | | | | science and art of | | | | correct thinking and | | | | reasoning. | | | | | | | | -The term "logic" | | | | comes from the Greek | | | | word "logikos" which | | | | means ordered, | | | | systematized, or | | | | intelligible. | | | | | | | | -Logic is the study | | | | of methods of | | | | evaluating whether | | | | the premises of an | | | | argument adequately | | | | supports its | | | | conclusion. | | | | | | | | -Logic is the study | | | | of the methods and | | | | principles used to | | | | distinguish correct | | | | from incorrect | | | | reasoning. | | | | | | | | -Logic is the field | | | | of study concerned | | | | with analyzing | | | | arguments and | | | | appraising their | | | | correctness or | | | | incorrectness. | | | | | | | | -Logic is the | | | | organized body of | | | | knowledge (science) | | | | that evaluates | | | | arguments. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Logic as a Science | -Logic is considered | | | and Art | a science for three | | | | major reasons: 1) it | | | | is a body of | | | | knowledge, 2) this | | | | body of knowledge is | | | | arranged in a | | | | systematic manner, | | | | and 3) it is | | | | objective and | | | | possesses general | | | | principles of | | | | argumentation and | | | | proof which can be | | | | formulated precisely | | | | and communicated to | | | | others. | | | | | | | | -Logic is considered | | | | an art because with | | | | the knowledge of the | | | | principles of correct | | | | thinking and | | | | reasoning, one can | | | | think and reason | | | | easily, | | | | spontaneously, and | | | | correctly. As an art, | | | | logic equips the mind | | | | with the capability | | | | to think right and | | | | without much effort. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Logic and Reason | -Logic deals with | | | | laws and rules. We | | | | submit to these laws | | | | and rules because we | | | | clearly see that they | | | | must be as they are. | | | | The mere reality of | | | | these laws and rules | | | | make us submit. | | | | However, logic does | | | | not require blind | | | | memorizing or a | | | | merely mechanical | | | | application of the | | | | laws and rules. A | | | | student of logic | | | | should not be | | | | satisfied with | | | | anything short of | | | | understanding the | | | | laws and rules. | | | | | | | | -To some extent, all | | | | of us are logicians | | | | by nature. We must | | | | not suppose that we | | | | know nothing at all | | | | about logic before we | | | | have formally studied | | | | it inside the | | | | classroom. Simply | | | | because we are | | | | rational beings, we | | | | spontaneously know | | | | the general laws of | | | | correct thinking and | | | | necessarily subject | | | | to them. The law of | | | | gravity was in effect | | | | before Newton | | | | formulated it. Human | | | | beings employ a | | | | certain way of | | | | thinking before | | | | Aristotle wrote the | | | | rules and laws. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Logic and Critical | -In this age of fake | | | Thinking | news, logic and | | | | critical thinking | | | | becomes all the more | | | | relevant and | | | | necessary. They are | | | | tools that allow us | | | | to navigate the flow | | | | of information, to | | | | sort out the good and | | | | the bad, to find | | | | patterns, to combine | | | | apparently unrelated | | | | bits, and to figure | | | | out how information | | | | can enrich our lives | | | | and help us manage | | | | our practical | | | | affairs. | | | | | | | | -Logic and critical | | | | thinking are not new | | | | to us. We could | | | | hardly have come this | | | | far without them. | | | | Many of the most | | | | important logical | | | | principles are | | | | embedded in language, | | | | and you learn them | | | | when you learn how to | | | | use such terms as | | | | ***and***, ***or***, | | | | and ***not***. We use | | | | logic and critical | | | | thinking when we | | | | organize materials to | | | | write term papers, | | | | try to persuade | | | | others to share your | | | | beliefs, convince | | | | friends to see one | | | | movie rather than the | | | | other, and defend | | | | your words and | | | | actions against | | | | critics. | | | | | | | | -Critical thinking | | | | refers to many | | | | different activities | | | | and abilities. The | | | | following list | | | | includes some of the | | | | important ones: | | | | | | | | 1\. analyzing the | | | | meaning of | | | | information | | | | | | | | 2\. checking | | | | information for | | | | accuracy and | | | | completeness | | | | | | | | 3\. putting various | | | | pieces of | | | | information | | | | together in a | | | | | | | | coherent way | | | | | | | | 4\. comprehending | | | | instructions and | | | | advice | | | | | | | | 5\. following | | | | directions | | | | | | | | 6\. solving problems | | | | | | | | 7\. judging what | | | | information is | | | | relevant to an | | | | issue | | | | | | | | 8\. questioning | | | | matters that do not | | | | make sense | | | | | | | | 9\. making decisions | | | | and plans based on | | | | the best available | | | | | | | | information or | | | | evidence | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Reasons for Studying | -We study logic to | | | Logic | develop methods and | | | | techniques that allow | | | | us to distinguish | | | | good arguments from | | | | bad. | | | | | | | | -We study logic to | | | | make sense when we | | | | criticize the | | | | arguments of others | | | | and when we advance | | | | arguments of our own. | | | | | | | | -Having the ability | | | | to reason in a | | | | particular way | | | | distinguishes humans | | | | from the rest of the | | | | animal kingdom. | | | | Learning the various | | | | techniques of logic | | | | improves and perfects | | | | the very reasoning | | | | ability that is so | | | | essential to our | | | | being human. | | | | | | | | -Studying logic will | | | | make explicit the | | | | rules of inference | | | | (reasoning) that are | | | | already part of your | | | | everyday life. | | | | | | | | -Whatever your | | | | college major is, a | | | | strong foundation in | | | | making good | | | | inferences or doing | | | | logic will improve | | | | your performance. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | History of Logic | -The person who is | | | | generally credited as | | | | the father of logic | | | | is the ancient Greek | | | | philosopher Aristotle | | | | (384 -- 322 B.C.E.). | | | | Aristotle was the | | | | first to devise the | | | | systematic criteria | | | | for analyzing and | | | | evaluating arguments. | | | | | | | | -Aristotle's chief | | | | accomplishment is | | | | called syllogistic | | | | logic. It is a kind | | | | of logic in which the | | | | fundamental elements | | | | are terms, and | | | | arguments are | | | | evaluated as good or | | | | bad depending on how | | | | the terms are | | | | arranged in an | | | | argument. | | | | | | | | -Aristotle also | | | | deserves credit for | | | | originating modal | | | | logic. It is the kind | | | | of logic that | | | | involves such | | | | concepts as | | | | possibility, | | | | necessity, belief and | | | | doubt. In addition, | | | | Aristotle also | | | | catalogued several | | | | informal fallacies. | | | | | | | | -After the death of | | | | Aristotle, the Greek | | | | philosopher | | | | Chrysippus (280-206 | | | | B.C.E.) developed a | | | | logic in which the | | | | fundamental elements | | | | were whole | | | | propositions. | | | | Chrysippus treated | | | | every proposition as | | | | either true or false. | | | | He developed rules | | | | for determining the | | | | truth or falsity of | | | | compound propositions | | | | from the truth or | | | | falsity of their | | | | components. | | | | | | | | -For thirteen hundred | | | | years after the death | | | | of Chrysippus, | | | | relatively little | | | | work was done in | | | | logic. The physician | | | | Galen (C. E. 129-ca. | | | | 199) developed the | | | | theory of compound | | | | categorical | | | | syllogism, but for | | | | the most part | | | | philosophers confined | | | | themselves to writing | | | | commentaries on the | | | | works of Aristotle | | | | and Chrysippus. | | | | Boethius (ca. | | | | 480-524) is a | | | | noteworthy example. | | | | | | | | -The first major | | | | logician in the | | | | Middle Ages was Peter | | | | Abelard (1079-1142). | | | | Abelard reconstructed | | | | and refined the logic | | | | of Aristotle and | | | | Chrysippus as | | | | communicated by | | | | Boethius. | | | | | | | | -Abelard originated | | | | the theory of | | | | universals that | | | | traced the universal | | | | character of general | | | | terms to concepts in | | | | the mind, rather than | | | | to natures existing | | | | outside the mind as | | | | Aristotle held. In | | | | addition, Abelard | | | | distinguished | | | | arguments that are | | | | valid because of | | | | their form from those | | | | that are valid | | | | because of their | | | | content. | | | | | | | | -After Abelard, the | | | | study of logic during | | | | the Middle Ages | | | | flourished through | | | | the work of numerous | | | | philosophers. The | | | | most original | | | | contributions from | | | | this period were made | | | | by William of Ockham | | | | (ca. 1285-1347). | | | | Ockham extended the | | | | theory of modal | | | | logic, conducted an | | | | exhaustive study of | | | | the forms of valid | | | | and invalid | | | | syllogisms, and | | | | further developed the | | | | idea of metalanguage, | | | | a higher-level | | | | language used to | | | | discuss linguistic | | | | entities such as | | | | words, terms and | | | | propositions. | | | | | | | | -Toward the middle of | | | | the fifteenth | | | | century, a reaction | | | | set in against the | | | | logic of the Middle | | | | Ages. Rhetoric | | | | largely displaced | | | | logic as the primary | | | | focus of attention. A | | | | reawakening did not | | | | occur until two | | | | hundred years later | | | | through the work of | | | | Gottfried Wilhelm | | | | Leibniz (1646-1716). | | | | | | | | -Leibniz attempted to | | | | develop a symbolic | | | | language or calculus | | | | that could be used to | | | | settle all forms of | | | | disputes. As a result | | | | of this work, Leibniz | | | | is sometimes credited | | | | with being the father | | | | of symbolic logic. | | | | Leibniz's efforts to | | | | symbolize logic were | | | | carried into the | | | | nineteenth century by | | | | Bernard Bolzano | | | | (1781-1848). | | | | | | | | -In the middle of the | | | | nineteenth century, | | | | logic commenced an | | | | extremely rapid | | | | period of development | | | | that has continued to | | | | this day. Work in | | | | symbolic logic was | | | | done by many | | | | philosophers and | | | | mathematicians, | | | | including Augustus De | | | | Morgan (1806-1871), | | | | George Boole | | | | (1815-1864), William | | | | Stanley Jevons | | | | (1835-1882), and John | | | | Venn (1834-1923). A | | | | revival in inductive | | | | logic was initiated | | | | by the British | | | | philosopher John | | | | Stuart Mill | | | | (1806-1873). | | | | | | | | -Across the Atlantic, | | | | the American | | | | philosopher Charles | | | | Sanders Peirce | | | | (1839-1914) developed | | | | a logic of relations, | | | | invented symbolic | | | | quantifiers, and | | | | suggested the | | | | truth-table method | | | | for formulas in | | | | propositional logic. | | | | The truth-table | | | | method was completed | | | | independently by Emil | | | | Post (1897-1954) and | | | | Ludwig Wittgenstein | | | | (1889-1951). | | | | | | | | -Toward the end of | | | | the nineteenth | | | | century, the | | | | foundations of modern | | | | mathematical logic | | | | were laid by Gottlob | | | | Frege (1848-1925). | | | | Frege's work was | | | | continued into the | | | | twentieth century by | | | | Alfred North | | | | Whitehead (1861-1947) | | | | and Bertrand Russell | | | | (1872-1970). | | | | | | | | -During the twentieth | | | | century, much of the | | | | work in logic focused | | | | on the formalization | | | | of logical systems | | | | and on questions | | | | dealing with the | | | | completeness and | | | | consistency of such | | | | systems. A now-famous | | | | theorem proved by | | | | Kurt Godel | | | | (1906-1978) states | | | | that in any formal | | | | system adequate for | | | | number theory there | | | | exists an undecidable | | | | formula, a formula | | | | such that neither it | | | | nor its negation is | | | | derivable from the | | | | axioms of the system. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | Basic Processes in | -Simple Apprehension: | | | Logic | It is a mental | | | | operation whereby the | | | | mind understands the | | | | essence or general | | | | meaning of a thing | | | | without affirming or | | | | denying anything | | | | about it. | | | | | | | | -Judgment: It is a | | | | mental operation | | | | through which the | | | | mind pronounces, | | | | enunciates, or | | | | declares the | | | | agreement or | | | | disagreement of two | | | | ideas. | | | | | | | | -Reasoning: It is a | | | | mental operation | | | | through which the | | | | agreement or | | | | disagreement of two | | | | ideas is inferred | | | | from their known | | | | relation to a third | | | | idea. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | References | Art of Critical | | | | Thinking, The: Logic | | | | for Filipino Students | | | | / Lionel E. | | | | Buenaflor. 3^rd^ ed. | | | | Mandaluyong City: | | | | Books Atbp. | | | | Publishing, 2014. | | | | | | | | Concise Introduction | | | | to Logic, A / Patrick | | | | J. Hurley, Lori | | | | Watson. 13^th^ ed. | | | | Boston, MA: Cengage | | | | Learning, 2018. | | | | | | | | Introduction to Logic | | | | / Andrew H. | | | | Bachhuber. New York: | | | | Appleton-Century-Crof | | | | ts, | | | | 1957. | | | | | | | | Introduction to Logic | | | | / Irving M. Copi, | | | | Carl Cohen, Kenneth | | | | McMahon. 14^th^ ed. | | | | Harlow: Pearson, | | | | 2014. | | | | | | | | Introduction to Logic | | | | / Michael Genesereth | | | | and Eric Kao. 2^nd^ | | | | ed. San Rafael, CA: | | | | Morgan and Claypool | | | | Publishers, 2013. | | | | | | | | Introduction to Logic | | | | and Critical Thinking | | | | / Merrilee H. Salmon. | | | | 6^th^ ed. Boston, MA: | | | | Wadsworth Cengage | | | | Learning, 2013. | | | | | | | | Logic: Basic | | | | Principles of | | | | Critical Thinking / | | | | Willie A. Buñag, | | | | Joselito B. Angulo, | | | | Charmaine Antoniette | | | | Adanza-Libarnes. | | | | Manila: Mindshapers, | | | | 2014. | | | | | | | | Logic: The Essentials | | | | / Patrick J. Hurley. | | | | Stamford, CT: Cengage | | | | Learning, 2016. | | | | | | | | Logic: The | | | | Philosophical | | | | Discipline of Correct | | | | Thinking / Eddie R. | | | | Babor. 3^rd^ ed. | | | | Quezon City: C and E | | | | Publishing, 2009. | | | | | | | | Logic: Towards | | | | Critical Thinking and | | | | Reasoning / Venancio | | | | B. Ardales. 3^rd^ ed. | | | | Manila: Educational | | | | Publishing House, | | | | 2008. | | | | | | | | Logic Book, The / | | | | Merrie Bergman, James | | | | Moor, Jack Nelson. | | | | 5^th^ ed. Boston, MA: | | | | McGraw Hill Higher | | | | Education, 2009. | | | | | | | | Logic for Filipinos / | | | | Priscilliano T. | | | | Bauzon. 3^rd^ ed. | | | | Mandaluyong City: | | | | National Book Store, | | | | 2013. | | | | | | | | Power of Logic, The / | | | | Frances | | | | Howard-Snyder, Daniel | | | | Howard Snyder, Ryan | | | | Wasserman. 4^th^ ed. | | | | Boston, MA: McGraw | | | | Hill Higher | | | | Education, 2009. | | | | | | | | Think: Critical | | | | Thinking and Logic | | | | Skills for Everyday | | | | Life / Judith A. | | | | Ross. 4^th^ ed. New | | | | York: McGraw Hill | | | | Education, 2017. | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+