English Reviewer PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Tags
Summary
This document provides a guide on identifying and evaluating information, highlighting the importance of source credibility and avoiding logical fallacies. It further discusses different types of issues and judgements, and includes examples of how to assess the validity of arguments. The document emphasizes understanding the concepts of relevance and truth in arguments.
Full Transcript
**ENGLISH REVIEWER** **RELEVANCE AND TRUTH** - RELEVANCE: Appropriateness of something is to what is being said - TRUTH: something that has been proven by facts or sincerity ***HOW TO SPOT FACTUAL/TRUTHFUL INFORMATION*** 1. *CONSIDER THE SOURCE* - Investigate the site/reference 2. *RE...
**ENGLISH REVIEWER** **RELEVANCE AND TRUTH** - RELEVANCE: Appropriateness of something is to what is being said - TRUTH: something that has been proven by facts or sincerity ***HOW TO SPOT FACTUAL/TRUTHFUL INFORMATION*** 1. *CONSIDER THE SOURCE* - Investigate the site/reference 2. *READ BEYOND* - Read and look for details such as statistics, date, name, etc. - FOCUS on the whole 3. *CHECK THE AUTHOR* - Do a quick search for reliability and credibility 4. *VERIFY SUPORTING SOURCES* - Determine if the given information supports the story. 5. *CHECK YOUR BIASES* - Consider your own beliefs if it will affect your judgement **INFORGRAPHIC** - VISUAL REPRESENTATION of information or data. - Collection of imagery, charts, and minimal texts. - Easy to understand overview **OPINION VS ARGUMENT** - ***ARGUMENT* --** Asserted reasons why one believes so. - *CONSISTS OF*: a. CONCLUSION (Indicators): - Therefore - Hence - Implies that - It follows that - So - Thus - Consequently b. *PREMIS*E (indicators) - Since - For - Given that - For the reason that - As - Is shown by the fact that *ARGUMENT IS VALID AND SOUND* **LOGICAL FALACIES** - Errors in reasoning that can be accidental or intentional. - Can be valid but not sound - Requires careful consideration and avoidance. 1. *HASTY GENERALIZATION* - Making assumptions about a whole group based on an inadequate sample. - Don't make a claim made from an evidence or two. 2. *POST HOC* - Stressing that two events are related in the sense that one causes another but they're actually not. 3. *SLIPPERY SLOPE* - Claiming a sort of chain reaction will take place by exaggerating without enough evidence. 4. *APPEAL TO AUTHORITY* - attempt to validate an by citing an authoritative source. - a claim is true simply because an authority figure made it **ISSUE** - A subject that people discuss about. ***TYPES OF ISSUES:*** 1. *SOCIAL ISSUES:* - Involves people in the society - The public recognizes the situation as a problem - Public considers it as a valid concern - Situation can be alleviated through joint actions of the citizens - Common problems that many people strive to solve. *(overpopulation, gender inequality, poverty, homelessness)* 2. *MORAL ISSUES:* - Internal concerns involve determining one\'s own values, beliefs, feelings, and learnings, which are often subjective and focus on self-discovery of morality. - Against the values, beliefs, and preferences. - Involves behavior patterns that bring conflicts. - Actions that have potential to harm - Morally and Illegaly wrong. - Violates the law of land - Done by a person, group, organization entrusted with authority *(corruption, manipulation, prostitution, extra marital/premarital relationship, psychical/mental abuses)* 3. *ECONOMIC ISSUES* - Being faced by the whole economy/regions of countries *(Prospects for growth, inflation, energy & the environment, inequality, labor issues, emerging markets, impact of new technology)* **TYPES OF JUDGEMENTS:** 1. *FACTUAL JUDGEMENTS:* - Based on observed facts or quantitative analysis. - Defined as the truths of the physical world. 2. *VALUE JUDGEMENTS:* - All moral judgements are value judgements - Not accessible via senses - Derived through one's own subjective reasoning *(FACTUAL JUDGEMENTS ARE CONVERSELY TRUE, BUT VALUE JUDGEMENTS MAY VARY DUE TO PERSONAL REFERENCES AND RELATIVE DEFINITION OF VIEWPOINTS* - *FACTUAL: Simon Riley is 6'10* - *VALUE: Simon Riley is tall)*