Summary

These notes cover the concept of wave-particle duality in light by explaining and analyzing topics such as the photoelectric effect and Compton effect in the context of quantum mechanics and the wave function using various formulas and equations.

Full Transcript

# Planck's Math ## Probability - Wave vs. Particle * Probability -> wave-like * Quantized energy $E=nhf$ -> particle-like * Blended wave and particle energy ## Wave-like Properties of Light * Stated that small things exhibit properties of both a wave and a particle * Test -> wave = double slit...

# Planck's Math ## Probability - Wave vs. Particle * Probability -> wave-like * Quantized energy $E=nhf$ -> particle-like * Blended wave and particle energy ## Wave-like Properties of Light * Stated that small things exhibit properties of both a wave and a particle * Test -> wave = double slit interference ## Particle-like Properties of Light * Particle -> quantized or discrete values of energy * To test particle nature of light, photoelectric effect was complete. ### The Photoelectric Effect * Metal * Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ .... -> require a specific amount of energy to eject (remove) an electron from metal. * Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ ... -> free to move * $E_k=hf$ * red -> less energy * blue -> more energy * more intense red (more energy) -> more intense wave * Even with the most intense red light, no electrons were ejected ### Testing the Particle Nature of Light * By changing the color or frequency of light, electrons were ejected. * This confirms the particle nature of light. ## Energy of Light - Particle-like * Light has energy like a particle -> so "collides" with electrons like particles to inelastically transfer energy. * 1.77 eV -> reflects * 2.25 eV -> ejected * 3.1 eV -> ejected and faster * 0.25 eV -> kinetic energy * 1.1 eV -> kinetic energy * Potassium -> 2.0 eV to eject electron * Work function is the amount of energy needed to eject an electron from a metal. * $W = E = hf$ * $f_0$ is the threshold frequency (minimum f) to eject an electron. A tiny frequency of light used will eject electrons faster. * $E_k$ (for electron) $= E$ (of light) $- W$ * $E_k = hf - hf_0$, or * $E_k = \frac{hf}{mc}+\frac{h f_0}{mc}$ * $E =hf$ * $hf = (6.63x10^{-34}J\cdot s) (1Hz)$ * $\frac{1}{1.6x10^{-19}J} = 1Hz$, or * $Ek = 1.6x10^{-19}J$ * $E_k = hf-W$ * $E_k = (6.63x10^{-34}J\cdot s)(8.0x10^{14} Hz) - 3.7x10^{-19}J$ * $E_k \approx 2.0x10^{-19}J$ * Light is quantum, and has wave-particle duality. * We call this quantum object a PHOTON. ## Photons * Photons -> light waves carrying "packets" of energy like a particle. * $E_{photon} = hf$ * ↑f means ↑$E_{photon}$ ### Photoelectric Effect * Used to eject electrons from just outside the visible spectrum. * Photon collides inelastically with an electron. * Photon's energy is transferred to the electron, causing it to move. ### Compton Effect * Continue to test collisions with photons using higher energy (x-rays). * X-ray has higher energy and momentum. * X-ray collides with a photon. * Photon has less energy, and has a lower frequency, but it's moving faster. * $E = hf$ * Photon can still transfer its energy to the electron, though the photon itself is now moving faster. ## Momentum * Collision demonstrates that photons have momentum. * $P_{particle} = mv$ * $P_{photon}$ -> photons (light) has no mass -> no momentum? * If a photon has energy, we can associate it with mass. * $P_{photon} = \frac{E}{c} = \frac{hf}{c} = \frac{h}{\lambda}$ * ↑f or ↑λ -> ↑P * ↓f or ↓λ -> ↓P * **Example:** * Determine the momentum of an x-ray with λ = 1.0x10<sup>-10</sup> m. And determine the energy in eV. * $P_{x-ray} = \tfrac{h}{\lambda} = \tfrac{6.63x10^{-34}J\cdot s}{1.0x10^{-10}m}$ * $P_{x-ray} = 6.63x10^{-24}J\cdot s$ * $E = hf$ or $P_{photon}c$ * $E = Pc$ * $E = (6.63x10^{-34}J\cdot s)(3.00x10^{8}m/s)$ * $E = 2.0x10^{-15}J$ * $\frac{1 eV}{1.6x10^{-19}J} = 12500 eV$ ## Wave-Particle Duality * Light is a wave, and has particle properties. * Particles - Can they act as waves? (Double slit test). * Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ -> interference patter * Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ Θ -> a particle is created. * Based on probability, we see regions where the electron is more likely (or less likely) to hit.. ## Particle-Like Properties of Particles * Particles acting like waves: * After doing the double-slit experiment with electrons, protons, neutrons, atoms, and some molecules, an interference pattern was observed above the interference. * Those particles also have wave-particle duality. * Some math is used to understand variables. * So, a particle has a λ associated with it. * λ (electron) = 3.0x10<sup>-15</sup> m * λ (green light) = 532 nm = 5.32x10<sup>-7</sup> m * λ (electron) <<< λ (visible light) * Louis de Broglie found a wavelength for particles: * $P_{photon} = \frac{h}{\lambda} ->\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{m}$ * This can be used to predict the behavior of electrons using the double slit experiment. * ↑m and ↑p of particles -> the associated λ decreases. * This creates a limitation in using this method. * The slit width is related to λ, and has to be greater than λ. * Evenually, the size of the particle is too large to fit through the opening. * Still, it is able to be tested. ### Measuring the Interference Pattern * Δx is inversely proportional to λ. * If λ is small, then Δx is small, and particles are more likely to be detected. * If λ is large, then Δx is large, and interference patterns cannot be observed (particles are more likely to miss the slits). ### Quantum Measurement * When measuring objects in the quantum world, objects do not change as they do in the classical world. * When measuring particles in the quantum world, we are using photons, which can disturb the particle. * So we are not able to completely understand all the details about small quantum objects. #### Analogy: * Imagine you are using a basketball to measure a baseball. The baseball will not be measured accurately and its behavior can be affected. * Example: Watching electrons pass through a double-slit experiment resulted in no interference pattern. * Even though we don't understand why the math works, it still does. ## Probability and Uncertainty * Electrons act as waves, but they do not have a localized position. * If we try to measure the position of an electron (as a particle), it will disturb it and change the system. * An electron can be measured across a space, like a wave -> wave function. * Not only a particle, but a wave function. * The wave function of the electrons creates an interference pattern. * Because we have probabilities, the exact values of an electron (a quantum object) is not perfect. * There is an error (uncertainty) associated with every measurement. * The uncertainty is not zero. * 1.0 m -> distance - Δd * 0.9 m - 1.1m * Δd = > 0.1m (net Δd) * Uncertainty in Δd = > 0.1 m * Short Δt * Long Δt * Δf Δx = constant * Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle: Measurement results are not exact or change for quantum. ## Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle * Δx -> uncertain in position. * Δp -> uncertainty in momentum/motion (speed and direction). * Δx Δp = constant (never 0) * Δx Δp = h/4π ### Diffraction of Light * Large opening -> large Δx * Small opening -> small Δx * The screen is hit in a small blob. * The range of direction is minimal. * If Δp is small (the spread of momentum is small) then the spread of position is small. * The Δp is small because photon's wavelengths are small. * If Δx is small, then the photon is more likely to spread out and produce an interference pattern. * The small Δx contributes to a small Δp. ## Quantum Theory * Quantum (quanta) -> a discrete physical property. * All measurements are related to the smallest value. * There is no continuous range of measurement. * **The Number Line** * → -2 -1 0 1 2...→ * → -1.6x10<sup>-19</sup> 0 1.6 x10<sup>-19</sup>...→ * Charge -1.6x10<sup>-19</sup>, 0, 1.6x10<sup>-19</sup> * q = Ne * **Particle** * Discrete quantities * Localized position * There is no interference pattern in the double slit experiment. * **Wave** * Carriers energy continuously in space. * Has interference patterns. * EM wave, vibration f, v=cλ (speed of light) ## Classical Physics * Classical physics distinguishes between a wave and a particle. ## Blackbody Radiation * Blackbody radiation in classical physics did not match the observed spectrum for blackbody radiation. ### Problem * The UV Catastrophe: The smaller waves being emitted from the blackbody suddenly drop off or stop. ## Solution * Max Planck decided to create a function of temperature. * To fit the graph, math was needed that quantized waves. * Put wave and particle equations together. * Quantized energy of a wave: $E = nhf$ * q = Ne * Planck's constant h = 6.63x10<sup>-34</sup>J⋅s * The math is based on probability. ### Waves Emitted by a Blackbody * Waves emitted by a blackbody are quantized. * Not all frequencies are generated, but since h is small, it looks like it does. * $E=nhf$. * So at high frequencies (for a low λ), the energy jump of an atom is very large, so the probability of an atom vibrating at this value is low (drops off). ## Relativistic Energy * E = mc<sup>2</sup> * $E_{total} = E_{kr} + E_{rest}$ * $E_T = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * $E_{kr} = \frac{1}{2} mv^2$ (classical or proper measurement) * $E_{kr} = E_T - E_{rest}$ * Energy measured in Joules is too small. * A better unit for energy is electron volts (eV) or MeV. * 1 MeV = 10<sup>6</sup> eV = 1.6 x10<sup>-13</sup> J ### Mass * Mass -> kg or J * E = mc<sup>2</sup> ### Kinetic Energy Changes * 1 eV = 1.6 x10<sup>-19</sup>J * ΔV -> 100 V * Gain E<sub>k</sub> -> ΔE<sub>k</sub> * ΔE<sub>k</sub> = (Δ-E<sub>e</sub>) * ΔE<sub>k</sub> = (-q ΔV) * ΔE<sub>k</sub> = (1.6 x10<sup>-19</sup> C) (100V) * 1 eV = 1.6x10<sup>-19</sup> J * **Example:** A proton in a particle accelerator reaches a speed of 0.70c. Find the relativistic kinetic energy (in Mev) and the classical kinetic energy (in Mev) to see the difference. * $E_{kr} = E_{total}- E_{rest}$ * $E_{kr} = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}-mc^2$ * $E_{kr} = mc^2 \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}-1\right)$ * $E_{kr}= 1.5x10^{-13}J (0.40)$ * $E_{kr}=6.02x10^{-11}J$ * $E_{kr} = \tfrac{1}{2} mv^2$ * $E_{kr} = \tfrac{1}{2} (1.67 x10^{-27} kg)(0.70(3.00 x10^8 m/s)^2$ * $E_{kr} = 3.68 x10^{-11}J$ * $E_{kr} = \tfrac{3.68 x10^{-11}J}{1.6x10^{-13}J/MeV}$ * $E_{kr} = 230 MeV$ * $E_{kr} = \tfrac{6.02 x10^{-11}J}{1.6 x10^{-13}J/MeV}$ * $E_{kr} = 376 MeV$ * $E_{kr} > E_{kr}$ * $E_{kr}$ is about 1.63 times $E_{kr}$. ## Special Relativity * Δt passes observers differently. * How different these times are depends on the relative motion between the observer and the object. * **Proper Measurement:** No relativistic motion between the observer and what they are measuring. * **Subscripts:** * **S** for Stationary * **P** for Proper * **O** for Original * **Proper Time:** Δt<sub>S</sub> * **Proper Distance:** Δd<sub>S</sub> * **Proper Time:** Δt<sub>P</sub> * **Proper Distance:** Δd<sub>P</sub> * **Original Time:** Δt<sub>O</sub> * **Original Distance:** Δd<sub>O</sub> * No motion = Proper measurement. * Ad = cΔt<sub>p</sub> * y = vΔt<sub>O</sub> * x = cΔt<sub>O</sub> * x<sup>2</sup> = Δd<sup>2</sup>+y<sup>2</sup> * (cΔt<sub>O</sub>)<sup>2</sup> = (cΔt<sub>P</sub>)<sup>2</sup>+(vΔt<sub>O</sub>)<sup>2</sup> * (cΔt<sub>O</sub>)<sup>2</sup> - (vΔt<sub>O</sub>)<sup>2</sup> = (cΔt<sub>P</sub>)<sup>2</sup> * c<sup>2</sup>(Δt<sub>O</sub>)<sup>2</sup> - v<sup>2</sup>(Δt<sub>O</sub>)<sup>2</sup> = c<sup>2</sup>(Δt<sub>P</sub>)<sup>2</sup> * Δt<sub>O</sub><sup>2</sup>(c<sup>2</sup>-v<sup>2</sup>) = c<sup>2</sup>(Δt<sub>P</sub>)<sup>2</sup> * Δt<sub>O</sub><sup>2</sup> ( $\frac{c^2-v^2}{c^2}$ ) = Δt<sub>P</sub><sup>2</sup> * * Δt<sub>O</sub> $\sqrt{\frac{(c^2-v^2}{c^2}}$ = Δt<sub>P</sub> * Δt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{Δt_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * This equation accounts for motion between the observer and what they are measuring. * **V** is the relative speed of the object. * **Δt (relative time)** is the time measured by an observer at rest. * **Δt<sub>P</sub>** is the proper time, which is the time measured by an observer moving with the object (in the object's rest frame). * **Δt<sub>O</sub>** is the time measured in the object's rest frame. ## Things to Remember * The only thing that changes in the special relativity equation for time is **V**, the relative speed between the observer and the measurement. * As **V** approaches **c**, the denominator of the equation approaches 0. * This means **ΔtO** approaches ∞. * If **V << c** * $\frac{V^2}{c^2} \approx 0$ * $√(\frac{1-v^2}{c^2}) \approx 1$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> = Δt<sub>P</sub> * if **0 << c** * $\frac{V^2}{c^2} << 1$ * $0 < √(\frac{1-v^2}{c^2}) < 1$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> > Δt<sub>P</sub> -> time dilation (bigger time) * If **V ≥ c** * $\frac{V^2}{c^2} ≥ 1$ * 1- $\frac{V^2}{c^2} ≤ 0$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> is undefined, or not real. * This does not occur. ## Example * Your favorite song on Earth lasts 3.00 minutes. If someone were to listen to your song on a spacecraft moving at: * a) 0.100 c * b) 0.90 c * **a) 0.100c** * Δt<sub>P</sub> = 3.00 min * Δt<sub>O</sub> = ? * Δt<sub>O</sub>= $\frac{Δt_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{3.00 min}{\sqrt{1-(0.10c)^2}}$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> ≈ 3.02 minutes * **b) 0.90c** * Δt<sub>P</sub> = 3.00 min * Δt<sub>O</sub> = ? * Δt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{Δt_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{3.00 min}{\sqrt{1-(0.90c)^2}}$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> ≈ 6.88 minutes ## Time Dilation * Δt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{Δt_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> > Δt<sub>P</sub> (at fast speed) * vΔt<sub>O</sub> = vΔt<sub>P</sub> * vΔt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{vΔt_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * V = $\frac{Δd}{Δt}$ (constant) * vΔt<sub>O</sub> = $\frac{Δd}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * L<sub>P</sub> = $\frac{L_V}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * L<sub>V</sub> = L<sub>P</sub> $\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}$ ## Length Contraction * L<sub>V</sub> > L<sub>P</sub> (at fast speeds) * Length contraction ### Example * A spacecraft has a measured length of 78 m while moving at 0.85c away from Earth. What length (L<sub>P</sub>) would the person inside the spaceship measure? * L<sub>V</sub> = 78 m * L<sub>P</sub> = ? * L<sub>V</sub> = L<sub>P</sub> $\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}$ * $\frac{L_V}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} = L_P$ * $\frac{78m}{√(1-0.85^2)} = L_P$ * $L_P = 148m$ ## Relativity * All measurements have a "relativistic" counterpart. * They are based on speed. * Momentum: p=mv * $P_{r} = \frac{P_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ * M and V are changing, * P<sub>P</sub> is proper mass. * m is the mass of the object at rest. * P<sub>r</sub> > P<sub>P</sub> * In order to move an object fast, a lot of work must be done. * This results in the object gaining kinetic energy. * If you supply a lot of energy, it doesn't entirely transfer to kinetic energy. * There is a point where the object reaches a speed where energy transforms to mass (E=mc<sup>2</sup>). * This means objects just become heavier, not faster. * Proper mass (rest mass) has an associated energy (E=mc<sup>2</sup>). * Proper mass (as long as it is greater than zero) can never be calculated beyond c. ## Momentum Graph * P (momentum) * **Red line**: Classical momentum * **Blue line**: Relativistic momentum * P=mv * 0.5v (in terms of c) ## Speed of Light * If you were light, v=c. * Δt<sub>O</sub> = Δt<sub>P</sub> * $\frac{Δt_P}{\sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} = Δt_O$ * Δt<sub>O</sub> would not exist. * Time would not exist for you. * Time is not defined. * L<sub>V</sub> = L<sub>P</sub> $√(1- \frac{v^2}{c^2})$ * L<sub>V</sub> = L<sub>P</sub> (0) * Length would be zero (so no space). ## General Relativity * Acceleration -> gravity. * Measurements change based on mass distorting the space-time fabric. * Satellite -> moves faster, 7ys a day. * One right -> General Relativity * 45 Ms a day * Δd = vΔt * v = 3.0x10<sup>8</sup> * Δt = 3.10<sup>-6</sup> * Δd < vΔt

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser