Human Beings and Nature PDF

~ - c J  7. The ideo1og1~a\ ch~nge i!t mait...

~ - c J  7. The ideo1og1~a\ ch~nge i!t mait eciatinS 11fc quality rather tha, / ~~~:tandard of~ivin~- !l.Those who t,eheve '" deep ccolog HUNIAN 91:,1NGS f bring abOut thlS change. 'the above prlnclPln can be nnn, three sl111Ple prop..-ltlon , r) AND NA-rORE Wilderness preservauon.. Control of human popul~t,_on. · Subscribe to s~mple. h":'mg "' mental da111age 1s ~1n~mized. --------.~,;?: "· 1'lJI ~ eco\ogy"-r-likc-'decp-ecc t"concerned.-.with.-Protect1ng the er _. le is that the liv in_g \ lerllr''sha~ \O~ Na,ss.j ioweV";" unlike deep ee< Deep ecology's core pnnc ~Jd be respected. It ,s believe in savtng the cnvuonm environment as a whole sho ards jtself as lookin~ value but for its usefulness to m: Introduction called "deep" beca$e ,t reg ealitY of bllfllaOlty s -~ e v e ! f ' ~ f o i e i he modem environment movement began in more deeply into the actua\ rworld as oppos_e d tof oxygen-oT..tb~sts en~th T the 1960s. But, at that time it was not rooted finnly enough. In 1962, the publication of 'Silent relationship with th_e natu;~talism ( conservauon o anthropocentnc environm the environmcntonlyforhum an needs-) th t th world selfish moti ve-be~ conse \ ha\\ow' ecologists do wlsh tc only for man's own needs. Spring' by Rachel Carson marked the beginning of believe a · db the Deep Ecology movement. Carson's writings 'Proponents of deep ecolog)' be freely ei.£!1eves m con~. as trees gwe us) the · e eSle~ 1deo\ogy of dom\natm \ regard5.1 of bUfllanity's oxygen.0L.t11e touf!stsenJO~ the sc~nery. There'lOO relat~atural world anses from these soc\~ ,al reah~ as opposed to selfish motive belnnd,!!l conservation actions. The "The ;shi_ps.. ral worl ervation of ~shallow' ecologists do wish to save the world but v ommat_1on _o f nature by man stems from the )S ;ntaJiSJTI (cOD only for man's own needs. T~ry real dommat1on of human by human." tinan need5·t1tat the world. ll. Stewardship of land d II. wi:~~~~~:::r~~7c~~ I onom1ca cslociety ;,~~~~!sboyr eccreating_ asses y !)eheve pfoited by Stewardship of la~ _c~ s upon eve':)'one ti~ society n place of _the existing hierarchical and clas~ to be ueelY ex to assume respons1b1hty for protect~ng the mtegrity syst~m, social ecology proposes an egalitarian of natural reso1:1rces an_d the IT und~rlying society. ba_sed on mutual aid, caring and · whole 1 ~cosysteillS and, m so _domg, safeguardmg the commumtanan values. People in this new society g)' bold ~eyfeel: mterests of future generati~ns. would appreciate that the interests of the collective [its p rtS·. rStewar d s h i p e mb o di es thr ee co n ce pt s:" aremseparablefromthoseofeachindividual. non-hUfllan hfe an and. itself. The responsibility, care for the land, and management of Social ecology envisions a moral economy that ' ! moves beyond scarcity and hierarchy toward a :ic value 11\ depend on I land for the benefit of future. generations) It is employed to descnbe morutonng and enforcing world that re-harmonizes hwnan communities with Jifedoesno \ thenatura\wor\d. conservation easements , managing land to. rease with encourage and sustain ecolo_gicalnealth, managing, Social _hierarchy and class have been used to ads to inc lands to maintain the diversity of earth's plants and -. legttim1ze the domination of the environment by a nima ls, and engaging the community mo re , Man. The core principle of social ecology is that this richness actively in protecting the natural resources on -, ecological problems arise from deep-seated social J reduce. I btJ1tlan satisfy vita which its livelihood depends not only for us but for""J problems. Ecological problems cannot be future generations as well. und~rs_tood, much less resolved, without facing ,UJllan life requires a There are three levels of stewardship practice: social issues. Lfonthropocentrism places hwnans at the top of a species 1. Conservation Easements ,uJation. '[bede